Skip to main content
Log in

Misdiagnosis of cervical ectopic pregnancy

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the presenting symptoms as well as the frequency and reasons for the delayed diagnosis of cervical ectopic pregnancy (CEP) in order to increase detection and prevent treatment delay.

Methods

Retrospective case series of 15 women treated for CEP from January 1997 through December 2008 at a university teaching hospital.

Results

Fifteen patients were treated for CEP during the study period. Eight patients presented to the emergency department, of which 6 (75%) were initially misdiagnosed. The most common misdiagnosis was threatened miscarriage (n = 5). All patients with accurately diagnosed CEP presented with heavy vaginal bleeding; those misdiagnosed reported mild to moderate vaginal bleeding. Three of six patients misdiagnosed did not have an ultrasound performed upon presentation, and three patients had an ultrasound report not suggestive of CEP. CEP was diagnosed on follow-up ultrasound, delaying treatment 1–4 days.

Conclusions

Misdiagnosis of CEP upon initial presentation is a common occurrence. Transvaginal ultrasound performed by a qualified practitioner may increase detection and prevent treatment delay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leeman LM, Wendland CL (2000) Cervical ectopic pregnancy. Diagnosis with endovaginal ultrasound examination and successful treatment with methotrexate. Arch Fam Med 9(1):72–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rothe DJ, Birnbaum SJ (1973) Cervical pregnancy: diagnosis and management. Obstet Gynecol 42(5):675–680

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ginsburg ES, Frates MC, Rein MS, Fox JH, Hornstein MD, Friedman AJ (1994) Early diagnosis and treatment of cervical pregnancy in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril 61(5):966–969

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ushakov FB, Elchalal U, Aceman PJ, Schenker JG (1997) Cervical pregnancy: past and future. Obstet Gynecol Surv 52(1):45–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Carreno CA, King M, Johnson MP, Yaron Y, Diamond MP, Bush D et al (2000) Treatment of heterotopic cervical and intrauterine pregnancy. Fetal Diagn Ther 15(1):1–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Frates MC, Benson CB, Doubilet PM, Di Salvo DN, Brown DL, Laing FC et al (1994) Cervical ectopic pregnancy: results of conservative treatment. Radiology 191(3):773–775

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hung TH, Jeng CJ, Yang YC, Wang KG, Lan CC (1996) Treatment of cervical pregnancy with methotrexate. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 53(3):243–247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jung SE, Byun JY, Lee JM, Wang KG, Lan CC (2001) Characteristic MR findings of cervical pregnancy. J Magn Reson Imaging 13(3):918–922

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bai SW, Lee JS, Park JH, Kim JY, Jung KA, Kim SK et al (2002) Failed methotrexate treatment of cervical pregnancy. Predictive factors. J Reprod Med 47(6):483–488

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim TJ, Seong SJ, Lee KJ, Lee JH, Shin JS, Lim KT et al (2004) Clinical outcomes of patients treated for cervical pregnancy with or without methotrexate. J Korean Med Sci 19(6):848–852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jeng CJ, Ko ML, Shen J (2007) Transvaginal ultrasound-guided treatment of cervical pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 109(5):1076–1082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vela G, Tulandi T (2007) Cervical pregnancy: the importance of early diagnosis and treatment. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14(4):481–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Song MJ, Moon MH, Kim JA, Kim TJ (2009) Serial transvaginal sonographic findings of cervical ectopic pregnancy treated with high-dose methotrexate. J Ultrasound Med 28(1):55–61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Verma U, Goharkhay N (2009) Conservative management of cervical ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 91(3):671–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gun M, Mavrogiorgis M (2002) Cervical ectopic pregnancy: a case report and literature review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19(3):297–301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pellerito JS, Taylor KJ, Quedens-Case C, Hammers LW, Scoutt LM, Ramos IM et al (1992) Ectopic pregnancy: evaluation with endovaginal color flow imaging. Radiology 183(2):407–411

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jurkovic D, Hacket E, Campbell S (1996) Diagnosis and treatment of early cervical pregnancy: a review and a report of two cases treated conservatively. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 8(6):373–380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zakaria MA, Abdallah ME, Shavell VI, Berman JM, Diamond MP, Kmak DC (2011) Conservative management of cervical ectopic pregnancy: the utility of uterine artery embolization. Fertil Steril 95(3):872–876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valerie I. Shavell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shavell, V.I., Abdallah, M.E., Zakaria, M.A. et al. Misdiagnosis of cervical ectopic pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285, 423–426 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-1980-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-1980-0

Keywords

Navigation