Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 285, Issue 2, pp 343–346 | Cite as

A randomized controlled trial to study the effect of IV hydration on the duration of labor in nulliparous women

  • A. Kavitha
  • K. P. Chacko
  • Elsy Thomas
  • Swati Rathore
  • Solomon Christoper
  • Bivas Biswas
  • Jiji Elizabeth MathewsEmail author
Maternal-Fetal Medicine



To compare the effects of two different regimens of intravenous hydration and oral hydration on the duration of active labor.


Two hundred and ninety-three low risk term primigravida in active labor were randomized into three groups. The first group had 99 patients who received oral fluids only, the second group of 98 patients received intravenous Ringer lactate at the rate of 125 ml/h (IV 125 ml) and the third group had 96 patients who received intravenous Ringer lactate at a rate of 250 ml/h (IV 250 ml). Amniotomy and oxytocin administration were allowed according to the physician’s discretion.


The mean duration of labor in the oral fluid group was 391, 363 min in the 125 ml/h group and 343 min in the 250 ml/h group, P = 0.203. The incidence of prolonged labor more than 12 h in the oral fluid group was 7.1% in the oral fluid group, 4.1% in the 125 ml/h group and 3.1% in the 250 ml/h group, P = 0.402. The oxytocin requirement was 37% in the oral group, 32% in the 125 ml/h group and 33% in the 250 ml/h group, P = 0.68. There was a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of vomiting in patients receiving intravenous hydration, i.e. 24.2% in the oral group, 11.2% in the 125 ml/h group and 6.3% in the 250 ml/h group, P = 0.001. There was no difference in the mode of delivery, maternal or neonatal complications between the three groups.


This study establishes a trend towards decreased incidence of prolonged labor and less vomiting in patients receiving intravenous hydration.


Prolonged labor Intravenous hydration Oral fluids Oxytocin 



We would like to thank Professor George A for suggesting this research idea.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.


  1. 1.
    Handa VL, Laros RK (1993) Active phase arrest in labor: delivery in nulliparous population. Obstet Gynecol 81:758–763PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maughan RJ, Noakes TD (1991) Fluid replacement and exercise stress: a brief review of studies on fluid replacement and some guidelines for the athlete. Sports Med 12(1):16–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Noakes TD (1993) Fluid replacement during exercise. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 21:297–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Garite TJ, Weeks J, Peters – Phair K et al (2000) A randomized control trial of the effect of increased intravenous hydration on the course of labor in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1544–1548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eslamian L, Marsoosi V, Pakneeyat Y (2006) Increased intravenous fluid intake and the course of labor in nulliparous women. Int J Gynecol Obstet 93:102–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coco A, Derksen-Schrock A, Coco K et al (2010) A randomized trial of increased intravenous hydration in labor when oral fluid is unrestricted. Fam Med 42(1):52–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    O’Sullivan G, Scrutton M (2003) NPO during labor. Is there any scientific validation? Anesthesiol Clin North America 21(1):87–98Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Kavitha
    • 1
  • K. P. Chacko
    • 1
  • Elsy Thomas
    • 2
  • Swati Rathore
    • 1
  • Solomon Christoper
    • 3
  • Bivas Biswas
    • 1
  • Jiji Elizabeth Mathews
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Unit 5Christian Medical CollegeVelloreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Unit 3Christian Medical CollegeVelloreIndia
  3. 3.Department of BiostatisticsChristian Medical CollegeVelloreIndia

Personalised recommendations