Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Pregnancy outcomes by mode of delivery among breech births

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes of the vaginal delivery versus cesarean delivery for the breech presentation.

Methods

We reviewed the maternal and neonatal charts of all singleton breech deliveries of <1,000, 1,000–1,500, 1,501–2,500, 2,501–4,000, and >4,000 g delivered between 2000 and 2006 at our institution. The study population consisted of 1,537 women with a fetus in a breech presentation. A group of 478 women that had delivered vaginally was compared with a group of 1,059 women, who had cesarean delivery, regarding neonatal mortality and morbidity (asphyxia, bone fractures, intraventricular hemorrhage, convulsions, respiratory distress syndrome, necrotizing enterocolitis, congenital hip dislocation), and maternal morbidity (febrile morbidity, anemia, wound infection).

Results

Neonatal complications did not differ between the group of women with term babies, <1,000 g babies, >1,500 g babies in breech presentation for women that had vaginal delivery and those that had cesarean delivery. On the other hand, breech presentation in preterm delivery between 1,000 and 1,500 g birth weight appears an independent risk factor for the neonatal mortality. There were fewer maternal complications in the vaginal group than in the cesarean group.

Conclusion

Vaginal delivery of 1,000–1,500 g babies presenting as breech is associated with the increased neonatal mortality compared with cesarean delivery. Cesarean delivery is associated with maternal morbidity compared with the vaginal delivery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acién P (1995) Breech presentation in Spain, 1992: a collaborative study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 62:19–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Weissman A, Hagay ZJ (1995) Management of breech presentation: the 1993 Israeli census. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 60:21–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hickok DE, Gordon DC, Milberg JA, Williams MA, Daling JR (1992) The frequency of breech presentation by gestational age at birth: a large population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166:851–852

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hill LM (1990) Prevalence of breech presentation by gestational age. Am J Perinatol 7:92–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Croughan-Minihane MS, Petitti DB, Gordis L, Golditch I (1990) Morbidity among breech infants according to method of delivery. Obstet Gynecol 75:821–825

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Graves WK (1980) Breech delivery in twenty years of practice. Am J Obstet Gynecol 137:229–234

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR (2000) Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomized multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 356:1375–1383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Penn ZJ, Steer PJ, Grant A (1996) A multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing elective and selective caesarean section for the delivery of the preterm breech infant. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103:684–689

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gifford DS, Morton SC, Fiske M, Kahn K (1995) A meta-analysis of infant outcomes after breech delivery. Obstet Gynecol 85:1047–1054

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. St Saunders NJ (1996) Controversies: the mature breech should be delivered by elective cesarean section. J Perinat Med 24:545–551

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Penkin P, Cheng M, Hannah M (1996) Survey of Canadian obstetricians regarding the management of term breech presentation. J SOGC 18:233–242

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cheng M, Hannah M (1993) Breech delivery at term: a critical review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol 82:605–618

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Goffinet F, Carayol M, Foidart JM, Alexander S, Uzan S, Subtil D, Bréart G, PREMODA Study Group (2006) Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194:1002–1011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sibony O, Luton D, Oury JF, Blot P (2003) Six hundred and ten breeches versus 12,405 cephalic deliveries at term: is there any difference in the neonatal outcome? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 107:140–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vendittelli F, Pons JC, Lemery D, Mamelle N, Obstetricians of the AUDIPOG Sentinel Network (2006) The term breech presentation: neonatal results and obstetric practices in France. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 125:176–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hofmeyr GJ, Hannah ME (2001) Planned Caesarean section for term breech delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD000166

  17. Whyte H, Hannah ME, Saigal S, Hannah WJ, Hewson S, Amankwah K, Cheng M, Gafni A, Guselle P, Helewa M, Hodnett ED, Hutton E, Kung R, McKay D, Ross S, Willan A, Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group (2004) Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the International Randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:864–871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Molkenboer JF, Reijners EP, Nijhuis JG, Roumen FJ (2004) Moderate neonatal morbidity after vaginal term breech delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 16:357–361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Al-Inizi SA, Khayata G, Ezimokhai M, Al-Safi W (2005) Planned vaginal delivery of term breech remains an option—result of eight years experience at a single centre. J Obstet Gynaecol 25:263–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Golfier F, Vaudoyer F, Ecochard R, Champion F, Audra P, Raudrant D (2001) Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section in singleton term breech presentation: a study of 1116 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 98:186–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Su M, Hannah WJ, Willan A, Ross S, Hannah ME, Term Breech Trial collaborative group (2004) Planned caesarean section decreases the risk of adverse perinatal outcome due to both labor and delivery complications in the Term Breech Trial. BJOG 111:1065–1074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Feige A, Douros A (1996) Mortality and morbidity of small premature infants (<1,500 g) in relation to presentation and delivery mode. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatal 200:50–55

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Muhuri PK, Macdorman MF, Menacker F (2006) Method of delivery and neonatal mortality among very low birth weight infants in the United States. Matern Child Health J 10:47–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Demol S, Bashiri A, Furman B, Maymon E, Shoham-Vardi I, Mazor M (2000) Breech presentation is a risk factor for intrapartum and neonatal death in preterm delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 93:47–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mattern D, Straube B, Hagen H (1998) Effect of mode of delivery on early morbidity and mortality of premature infants (< or =34th week of pregnancy). Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 202:19–24

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ismail MA, Nagib N, Ismail T, Cibils LA (1999) Comparison of vaginal and cesarean section delivery for fetuses in breech presentation. J Perinat Med 27:339–351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cibils LA, Karrison T, Brown L (1994) Factors influencing neonatal outcomes in the very-low-birth-weight fetus (<1500 grams) with a breech presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:35–42

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Karlberg P, Adams FH, Geubelle F, Wallgren G (1962) Alteration of the infant’s thorax during vaginal delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 41:223–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Brown L, Karrison T, Cibils LA (1994) Mode of delivery and perinatal results in breech presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:28–34

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kumari AS, Grundsell H (2004) Mode of delivery for breech presentation in grandmultiparous women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 85:234–239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sanchez-Ramos L, Wells TL, Adair CD, Arcelin G, Kaunitz AM, Wells DS (2001) Route of breech delivery and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 73:7–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang BS, Zhou LF, Coulter D, Liang H, Zhong Y, Guo YN, Zhu LP, Gao XL, Yuan W, Gao ES (2010) Effects of caesarean section on maternal health in low risk nulliparous women: a prospective matched cohort study in Shanghai, China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 10:78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee KS, Khoshnood B, Sriram S, Hsieh HL, Singh J, Mittendorf R (1998) Relationship of cesarean delivery to lower birth weight-specific neonatal mortality in singleton breech infants in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 92:769–774

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zlatnik FJ (1993) The Iowa premature breech trial. Am J Perinatol 10:60–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Gravenhorst JB, Schreuder AM, Veen S, Brand R, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, Verweij RA, van Zeben-van der Aa DM, Ens-Dokkum MH (1993) Breech delivery in very preterm and very low birth weight infants in The Netherlands. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 100:411–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zeynep Kamil Gynecologic and Pediatric Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, 34668, Turkey

    Oya Demirci, Ahmet Semih Tuğrul, Abdulkadir Turgut, Şirin Ceylan & Sadiye Eren

Authors
  1. Oya Demirci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ahmet Semih Tuğrul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abdulkadir Turgut
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Şirin Ceylan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sadiye Eren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oya Demirci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Demirci, O., Tuğrul, A.S., Turgut, A. et al. Pregnancy outcomes by mode of delivery among breech births. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285, 297–303 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-1956-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-1956-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation