Advertisement

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 284, Issue 2, pp 421–425 | Cite as

Hysterectomy for large symptomatic myomas: minilaparotomy versus midline vertical incision

  • Tuncay Küçüközkan
  • Enis ÖzkayaEmail author
  • Fatma Özlem Uçar
  • Osman Fadıl Kara
General Gynecology

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to analyze the perioperative outcomes of laparotomy with conventional midline incision and minilaparotomy in patients with large myomas, in a prospective and randomized manner.

Study design

From January 2005 to January 2009, 205 consecutive hysterectomies for large symptomatic myomas had been performed by abdominal approach. Patients were randomly assigned to minilaparotomy or midline incision.

Results

Groups were compared and found to be similar in terms of age, gravida, parity, body mass index, uterine size, operative time and intraoperative hemorrhage volume. Length of hospital stay, rate of surgical site infection and postoperative fever were significantly higher in the conventional laparotomy group with midline incision.

Conclusion

Minilaparotomy is an applicable procedure in hysterectomy for large myomas in the majority of women, resulting in decreased length of hospital stay and complication rates.

Keywords

Minilaparotomy Myoma Hysterectomy 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Farquhar CM, Steiner CA (2002) Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990–1997. Obstet Gynecol 99(2):229–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maresh MJ, Metcalfe MA, McPherson K et al (2002) The VALUE national hysterectomy study: description of the patients and their surgery. BJOG 109:302–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benedetti-Panici P, Maneschi F, Cutillo G et al (1996) Surgery by minilaparotomy in benign gynecologic disease. Obstet Gynecol 87:456–459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fagotti A, Ferrandina G, Longo R, Mancuso S, Scambia G (2002) Minilaparotomy in early stage endometrial cancer: an alternative to standard and laparoscopic treatment. Gynecol Oncol 86:177–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fanfani F, Fagotti A, Longo R, Marana E, Mancuso S, Scambia G (2005) Minilaparotomy in the management of benign gynecologic disease. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 119(2):232–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Einarsson JI, Matteson KA, Schulkin J, Chavan NR, Sangi-Haghpeykar H (2010) Minimally invasive hysterectomies—a survey on attitudes and barriers among practicing gynecologists. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(2):167–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sharma JB, Wadhwa L, Malhotra M, Arora R (2004) Minilaparotomy versus conventional laparotomy for abdominal hysterectomy: a comparative study. Indian J Med Sci 58(5):196–202PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoffman MS, Lynch CM (1998) Minilaparotomy hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:316–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Flynn M, Niloff JM (1995) Minilaparotomy for the ambulatory management of ovarian cysts. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:1727–1730PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ciavattini A, Tsiroglou D, Litta P, Frizzo H, Tranquilli AL (2009) Ultra-minilaparotomy myomectomy: a minimally invasive surgical approach for the treatment of large uterine myomas. Gynecol Obstet Invest 68(2):127–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wen KC, Sung PL, Chao KC, Lee WL, Liu WM, Wang PH (2008) A prospective short-term evaluation of uterine leiomyomas treated by myomectomy through conventional laparotomy or ultraminilaparotomy. Fertil Steril 90(6):2361–2366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Panici PB, Zullo MA, Angioli R, Muzii Ludovico (2005) Minilaparotomy hysterectomy: a valid option for the treatment of benign uterine pathologies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 119:228–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Panici PB, Muzii L, Palaia I, Manci N, Bellati F, Plotti F, Zullo M, Angioli RV (2007) Minilaparotomy versus laparoscopy in the treatment of benign adnexal cysts: a randomized clinical study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 133(2):218–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Benassi L, Rossi T, Kaihura CT, Ricci L, Bedocchi L, Galanti B, Vadora E (2002) Abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187(6):1561–1565PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alessandri F, Lijoi D, Mistrangelo E, Ferrero S, Ragni N (2006) Randomized study of laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy for uterine myomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13(2):92–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marana R, Busacca M, Zupi E et al (1999) Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:270–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reich H, DeCaprio J, McGlynn F (1989) Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg 5:213–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dorsey JH, Steinberg EP, Holtz PM (1995) Clinical indications for hysterectomy route: patient characteristics or physician preference? Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:1452–1460PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nezhat C, Bess O, Admon D, Nezhat CH, Nezhat F (1994) Hospital cost comparison between abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomies. Obstet Gynecol 83:713–716PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lumsden MA, Twaddle S, Hawthorn R, Traynor I, Gilmore D, Davis J et al (2000) A randomised comparison and economic evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy. BJOG 107:1386–1391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Falcone T, Paraiso MRF, Mascha E (1999) Prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:955–962PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Meikle SF, Nugent EW, Orleans M (1997) Complications and recovery from laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 89:304–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tuncay Küçüközkan
    • 1
  • Enis Özkaya
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fatma Özlem Uçar
    • 1
  • Osman Fadıl Kara
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyDr. Sami Ulus Maternity and Women’s Health Teaching and Research HospitalAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations