Advertisement

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 284, Issue 2, pp 307–311 | Cite as

Predictive value of middle cerebral artery to uterine artery pulsatility index ratio in preeclampsia

  • Ahmet Eser
  • Ebru ZulfıkarogluEmail author
  • Suleyman Eserdag
  • Sevtap Kılıc
  • Nurı Danısman
Materno-fetal Medicine

Abstract

Objective

To determine the predictive value of middle cerebral artery (MCA) to uterine artery pulsatility index (PI) ratio in preeclamptic patients.

Methods

This prospective cross-sectional study was performed on 64 preeclamptic and 131 normal pregnancies at or beyond 26 weeks of gestation between June 2007–August 2008 in the high-risk pregnancy unit of Dr. Zekai Tahir Burak Women Health Teaching and Research Hospital, Ankara. Doppler blood flow velocimetry of the uterine and umbilical arteries and fetal MCA was measured. The ratios between the PI of MCA and the mean PI value of both uterine arteries were calculated and values below the fifth percentile were considered as brain-sparing. The ratios between the PI of MCA and PI of the umbilical artery were calculated and values lower than 1.08 were considered as brain-sparing and the results were related to perinatal outcome. Statistical analysis were performed using the SPSS Software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) version 9.0 for Windows. Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (95%) was also used for statistical analysis.

Results

In 11 (42.3%) of the preeclamptic pregnancies that had abnormal MCA/uterine artery PI, 4 of them had severe preeclampsia and 7 had mild preeclampsia. In the low MCA/uterine artery PI ratio group, a statistically significantly higher rate of Cesarean section (66 vs. 88.46%), NICU admission (26.3 vs. 57.6%), preterm birth (52.6 vs. 92.3%) was found. Abnormal MCA/uterine artery PI ratio and abnormal MCA/umbilical artery PI ratio in the prediction of adverse outcome of pregnancy was compared. In the prediction of preterm birth, which was better for the MCA/uterine artery, there was a significant difference between the ratios (P = 0.005).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that MCA/uterine artery PI ratio is a good predictor of neonatal outcome in preeclamptic patients in the third trimester and could be used to identify fetuses at risk of morbidity and mortality.

Keywords

Doppler ultrasound MCA/uterine artery PI ratio Brain-sparing Preeclampsia Perinatal outcome 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Cunnigham FG, Gant N, Leveno K, Gilstrap L, Hauth J, Wentrom K (2001) Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. In: Cunnigham FG, Williams JW (eds) Williams obstetrics, 21st edn. McGraw–Hill, New York (NY), pp 567–618Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goldman-Whol D, Yagel S (2002) Regulation of trophoblast invasion: from normal implantation to preeclampsia. Moll Cell Endocrinol 187:233–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gunenc O, Cicek N, Gorkemli H, Celik C, Acar A, Akyurek C (2002) The effect of methyldopa treatment on uterine, umbilical and fetal middle cerebral artery blood flows in preeclamptic patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 266:141–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dubiel M, Gudmundsson S, Gunnarsson G, Marsal K (1997) Middle cerebral artery velocimetry as a predictor of hypoxemia in fetuses with increased resistance to blood flow in the umbilical artery. Early Hum Dev 47:177–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peeters LH, Sheldon RE, Jones MD, Makowski EL, Meschisa G (1979) Blood flow to fetal organs as a function of arterial oxygen content. Am J Obstet Gynecol 135:637–642PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harrington K, Carpenter G, Nguyen M, Campbell S (1995) Changes observed in Doppler studies of the fetal circulation in pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia or the delivery of a small-for-gestational-age baby. I. Cross-sectional analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 6:19–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harrington K, Thompson MO, Carpenter RG, Nguyen M, Campbell S (1999) Doppler fetal circulation in pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia or delivery of a small for gestational age baby: 2. Longitudinal analysis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106:453–466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arduini D, Rizzo G (1992) Prediction of fetal outcome in small for gestational age fetuses: comparison of Doppler measurements obtained from different fetal vessels. J Perinat Med 20:29–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ozeren M, Dinc H, Ekmen U, Senekayli C, Aydemir V (1999) Umbilical and middle cerebral artery Doppler indices in patients with preeclampsia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 82:11–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Makhsheed M, Jirous J, Ahmed MA, Viswanathan DL (2000) Middle cerebral artery to umbilical artery resistance index ratio in the prediction of neonatal outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 71:119–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ebrashy A, Azmy O, Ibrahim M, Waly M, Edris A (2005) Middle cerebral/umbilical artery resistance index ratio as sensitive parameter for fetal well- being and neonatal outcome in patients with preeclampsia: case–control study. Croat Med J 46(5):821–825PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hernandez-Andrade E, Brodszki J, Lingman J, Gudmundsson S, Molin J, Marsal K (2002) Uterine artery score and perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19:438–442PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Report of National High Blood Pressure Education ProgramWorking Group (2000) Report on high blood pressure in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1–22Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nijhuis JG, Prechtl HF, Martin CB Jr, Bots RS (1982) Are there behavioural states in human fetus? Early Hum Dev 6:177–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Campbell S, Diaz-Recasens J, Griffin D, Cohen-Overbeek T, Pearce J, Wilson K, Teague M (1983) New Doppler technique for assessing utero-placental blood flow. Lancet 1:675–677PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grammelini D, Folli MC, Raboni S, Vadora E, Meradi A (1992) Cerebral-umbilical Doppler ratio as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 79:416–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Simanaviciute D, Gudmundsson S (2006) Fetal middle cerebral to uterine artery pulsatility index ratios in normal and pre-eclamptic pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28:794–801PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Groom KM, North AR, Stone PR, Chan EHY, Taylor RS, Dekker GA et al (2009) Patterns of change in uterine artery Doppler studies between 20 and 24 weeks of gestation and pregnancy outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 113(2 Pt 1):332–338PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Meads CA, Cnossen JS, Meher S, Juarez-Garcia A, Ter Riet G, Duley L et al (2008) Methods of prediction and prevention of preeclampsia: systematic reviews of accuracy and effectiveness literature with economic modelling. Health Technol Assess 12(iii–iv):1–270Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Espinoza J, Romero R, Nien JK, Gomez R, Kusanovic JP, Gonçalves LF et al (2007) Identification of patients at risk for early onset and/or severe preeclampsia with the use of uterine artery Doppler velocimetry and placental growth factor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196:326. el–e13Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Severi FM, Bocchi C, Visentin A (2002) Uterine and fetal cerebral Doppler predict the outcome of third-trimester small-for-gestational age fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19:225–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ott WJ, Mora G, Arias F, Sunderji S, Sheldon G (1998) Comparison of the modified biophysical profile to a ‘new’ biophysical profile incorporating the middle cerebral artery to umbilical artery velocity flow systolic/diastolic ratio. Am J Obstet Gynecol 178:1346–1353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bahado-Sing RO, Kovanci E, Jeffres A, Oz U, Deren O, Copel J, Mari G (1999) The Doppler cerebroplacental ratio and perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:750–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Costa SL, Proctor L, Dodd JM, Toal M, Okun M, Johnson JA, Windrim R, Kingdom JCP (2008) Screening for placental insufficiency in high-risk pregnancies: is earlier better? Placenta 29:1034–1040PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Adali E, Yildizhan R, Kolusari A, Kurdoglu M, Bugdayci G, Sahin HG, Kamaci M (2009) Increased visfatin and leptin in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 1:1–7Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vyas S, Nicolaides KH, Bower S, Campbell S (1990) Middle cerebral artery flow velocity waveforms in fetal hypoxemia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 97:797–803PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ahmet Eser
    • 1
  • Ebru Zulfıkaroglu
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Suleyman Eserdag
    • 1
  • Sevtap Kılıc
    • 1
  • Nurı Danısman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyAnkara Dr. Zekai Tahir Burak Women Health Teaching and Research HospitalAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.AnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations