Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Vaginal hysterectomy with bipolar coagulation forceps (BiClamp) as an alternative to the conventional technique

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim was to identify the advantages and disadvantages of using bipolar coagulation forceps in vaginal hysterectomy and to compare the effects of this method with those of the conventional technique.

Methods

A group of 30 patients was operated on with bipolar coagulation forceps and the next 30 were operated on using the traditional method. The following parameters were observed: duration of procedure, blood loss, complications, postoperative pain, hospitalization time and cost of treatment.

Results

The duration of the surgical procedure and hospitalization time were similar in both groups. Blood loss was lower in the BiClamp group. There were no serious complications in either group. In one case with BiClamp, laparotomy was performed to stop persistent bleeding; the after-effects of the laparotomy were not statistically significant. The patients in the BiClamp group reported less pain, experienced shorter recuperation times and incurred lower treatment costs.

Conclusions

The BiClamp technique is a good alternative to traditional hysterectomy methods as it causes lower blood loss during surgery, causes less post-operative pain and is economically more favorable for the patient and hospital.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Malinowski A, Cieślak J (2007) Anatomical aspects of vaginal hysterectomy. In: Malinowski A (ed) Advanced surgical techniques in gynecology: hysterectomy. Printing house LCL, Łódź, pp 47–59

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zubke W, Becker S, Kraemer B, Wallwiener D (2004) Vaginal hysterectomy: a new approach using bipolar coagulation forceps. Gynecol Surg 1:179–182

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liu CY (1992) Laparoscopic hysterectomy. A review of 72 cases. J Reprod Med 37:351–354

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dubuc–Lissoir J (2003) Use of a new energy-based vessel ligation device during laparoscopic gynecologic oncologic surgery. Surg Endosc 17:466–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Landman J, Kerbl K, Rehman J et al (2003) Evaluation of a vessel sealing system, bipolar electrosurgery, harmonic scalpel, titanium clips, endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis vascular stapes and sutures for arterial and venous ligation in a porcine model. J Urol 169:697–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Heniford BT, Matthews BD, Sing RF, Backus C, Pratt B, Greene FL (2001) Initial results with an electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer. Surg Endosc 15:799–801

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Karram MM (2001) Vaginal hysterectomy. In: Baggish MS, Karram MM (eds) Atlas of pelvic anatomy and gynecologic surgery. WB Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thompson JD, Thompson JD, Rock JA (1992) Te Linde’s operative gynecology, 17th edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clave H, Niccolai P (2003) Hysterectomy without pain: an innovative technique. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 32:375–380

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wojdat R, Volz J (2004) Vaginal hysterectomy using the BiClamp: an experience report. 55th Kongress Dt. Ges. Geb. Gyn., Hamburg

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dariusz Samulak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Samulak, D., Wilczak, M., Michalska, M.M. et al. Vaginal hysterectomy with bipolar coagulation forceps (BiClamp) as an alternative to the conventional technique. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284, 145–149 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1617-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1617-8

Keywords

Navigation