Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 284, Issue 1, pp 111–117 | Cite as

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of saline infusion sonohysterography, transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy in postmenopausal bleeding

  • Banu Bingol
  • M. Ziya Gunenc
  • Ali Gedikbasi
  • Haldun Guner
  • Seval Tasdemir
  • Bulent Tiras
General Gynecology



To compare the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography (TVS), saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS) and hysteroscopy (HS) with respect to pathological diagnosis in the detection of uterine cavity abnormalities associated with abnormal uterine bleeding among postmenopausal women.


Being a prospective, investigator-blind trial, the present study was conducted on 137 postmenopausal women, with abnormal uterine bleeding, admitted to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Istanbul Bilim University, Florence Nightingale Hospital and Fertigyn Woman Health and IVF Center. After TVS, all patients underwent SIS using Cook Soft 500 IVF transfer catheter and HS, consecutively. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were calculated to compare the diagnostic accuracy of TVS, SIS and HS.


Most commonly encountered endometrial lesions were polypoid lesion (38.0%) and hyperplasia (28.4%) among our study population consisting of 137 women (mean age 61.6 ± 9.6 years) in their postmenopausal stage. Overall sensitivity rates were 70.0% for TVS, 89.6% for SIS and 92.3% for HS, while the overall specificity rates were 50.0, 77.3 and 80.7%, respectively. HS had PPV of 96.2% and NPV of 65.3%, whereas PPV was determined to be 80.9 versus 95.3% and NPV was 35.4 versus 58.3% for TVS and SIS, respectively.


As an easy to perform, safe and well-tolerated procedure yielding high diagnostic accuracy, saline infusion SIS via this catheter seems to be superior to TVS and very close to HS. It may be used as the primary method for the detection of uterine abnormalities among postmenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding.


Transvaginal sonography Saline infusion sonohysterography Hysteroscopy Postmenopausal bleeding Uterine cavity Diagnostic accuracy 


  1. 1.
    Bignardi T, Van den Bosch T, Condous G (2009) Abnormal uterine and post-menopausal bleeding in the acute gynaecology unit. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 23:595–607PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Spencer CP, Whitehead MI (1999) Endometrial assessment re-visited. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106:623–632PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith-Bindman R, Kerlikowske K, Feldstein VA et al (1998) Endovaginal ultrasound to exclude endometrial cancer and other endometrial abnormalities. J Am Med Assoc 280:1510–1517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Koss LG (1995) Detection of occult endometrial carcinoma. J Cell Biochem 23:165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coulter A, Klassen A, MacKenzie IZ, McPherson K (1993) Diagnostic dilatation and curettage: is it used appropriately? BMJ 306:236–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Epstein E, Ramirez A, Skoog L, Valentin L (2001) Dilatation and curettage fails to detect most focal lesions in the uterine cavity in women with postmenopausal bleeding. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:1131–1136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clark TJ, Barton PM, Coomarasamy A, Gupta JK, Khan KS (2006) Investigating postmenopausal bleeding for endometrial cancer: cost-effectiveness of initial diagnostic strategies. BJOG 113:502–510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alborzi S, Dehbashi S, Khodaee R (2003) Sonohysterosalpingographic screening for infertile patients. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 82:57–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Emanuel MH, Verdel MJ, Wamsteker K, Lammes FB (1995) A prospective comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and diagnostic hysteroscopy in the evaluation of patients with abnormal uterine bleeding: clinical implications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172:547–552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karlsson B, Granberg S, Wikland M et al (1995) Transvaginal ultrasonography of the endometrium in women with postmenopausal bleeding—a Nordic multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172:1488–1494PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ferrazzi E, Torri V, Trio D, Zannoni E, Filiberto S, Dordoni D (1996) Sonographic endometrial thickness: a useful test to predict atrophy in patients with postmenopausal bleeding. An Italian multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 7:315–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cicinelli E, Romano F, Anastasio PS, Blasi N, Parisi C, Galantino P (1995) Transabdominal sonohysterography, transvaginal sonography, and hysteroscopy in the evaluation of submucous myomas. Obstet Gynecol 85:42–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Richman TS, Viscomi GN, de Cherney A, Polan ML, Alcebo LO (1984) Fallopian tubal patency assessed by ultrasound following fluid injection. Radiology 152:507–510PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bonilla-Musoles F, Simon C, Serra V, Sampaio M, Pellicer A (1992) An assessment of hysterosalpingosonography (HSSG) as a diagnostic tool for uterine cavity defects and tubal patency. J Clin Ultrasound 20:175–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Widrich T, Bradley LD, Mitchinson AR, Collins RL (1996) Comparison of saline infusion sonography with office hysteroscopy for the evaluation of the endometrium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174:1327–1334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vercellini P, Cortesi I, Oldani S, Moschetta M, De Giorgi O, Crosignani PG (1997) The role of transvaginal ultrasonography and outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy in the evaluation of patients with menorrhagia. Hum Reprod 12:1768–1771PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brown SE, Coddington CC, Schnorr J, Toner JP, Gibbons W, Oehninger S (2000) Evaluation of outpatient hysteroscopy, saline infusion hysterosonography and hysterosalpingography in infertile women: a prospective, randomized study. Fertil Steril 74:1029–1034PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Soares SR, Barbosa dos Reis MM, Camargos AF (2000) Diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography, transvaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography in patients with uterine cavity diseases. Fertil Steril 73:406–411PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gaucherand P, Piacenza JM, Salle B, Rudigoz RC (1995) Sonohysterography of the uterine cavity: preliminary investigations. J Clin Ultrasound 23:339–348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yarali H, Gurgan T, Erden A, Kisnisci HA (1994) Colour Doppler hysterosalpingosonography: a simple and potentially useful method to evaluate fallopian tubal patency. Hum Reprod 9:64–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dueholm M, Forman A, Jensen ML, Laursen H, Kracht P (2001) Transvaginal sonography combined with saline contrast sonohysterography in evaluating the uterine cavity in premenopausal patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:54–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Krampl E, Bourne T, Hurlen-Solbakken H, Istre O (2001) Transvaginal ultrasonography sonohysterography and operative hysteroscopy for the evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:616–622PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Erdem M, Bilgin U, Bozkurt N, Erdem A (2007) Comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and saline infusion sonohysterography in evaluating the endometrial cavity in pre- and postmenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding. Menopause 14:846–852PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Van den Bosch T, Verguts J, Daemen A et al (2008) Pain experienced during transvaginal ultrasound, saline contrast sonohysterography, hysteroscopy and office sampling: a comparative study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:346–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pasrija S, Trivedi SS, Narula MK (2004) Prospective study of saline infusion sonohysterography in evaluation of perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 30:27–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Parsons AK, Lense JJ (1993) Sonohysterography for endometrial abnormalities: preliminary results. J Clin Ultrasound 21:87–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rosen KA, Pritzker J (1998) Transvaginal sonography and sonohysterography as screening tools for postmenopausal bleeding. Prim Care Update Ob/Gyns 5:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Goldstein SR (1993) Use of ultrasonohysterography for triage of perimenopausal patients with unexplained uterine bleeding. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:565–570Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fukuda M, Shimizu T, Fukuda K, Yomura W, Shimizu S (1993) Transvaginal hysterosonography for differential diagnosis between submucous and intramural myoma. Gynecol Obstet Invest 35:236–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ragni G, Diaferia D, Vegetti W, Colombo M, Arnoldi M, Crosignani PG (2005) Effectiveness of sonohysterography in infertile patient work-up: a comparison with transvaginal ultrasonography and hysteroscopy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 59:184–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Allahbadia GN, Kadam K, Allahbadia S (2004) Saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS). Rev Gyneacol Practice 4:181–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Grunfeld L, Walker B, Bergh PA (1991) High-resolution endovaginal ultrasonography of the endometrium, a noninvasive test for endometrial adequacy. Obstet Gynecol 78:200–204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nanini R, Chelo R, Branconi F, Tantini C (1994) Dynamic echohysterography: a new diagnostic technique. Acta Eur Fertil 12:167–171Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Alatas C, Aksoy E, Akarsu C (1997) Evaluation of intrauterine abnormalities in infertile patients by sonohysterography. Hum Reprod 12:487–490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Laifer-Narin S, Ragavendra N, Parmenter EK, Grant EG (2002) False-normal appearance of the endometrium on conventional transvaginal sonography: comparison with saline hysterosonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:129–133PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fedele L, Bianchi S, Dorta M, Brioschi D, Zanotti F, Vercellini P (1991) Transvaginal ultrasonography versus hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of uterine submucous myomas. Obstet Gynecol 77:745–748PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cacciatore B, Ramsay T, Lehtovirta P, Ylöstalo P (1994) Transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy in postmenopausal bleeding. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 73:413–416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lewit N, Thaler I, Rottem S (1990) The uterus: a new look with transvaginal sonography. J Clin Ultrasound 18:331–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Deckardt R, Lueken RP, Gallinat A et al (2002) Comparison of transvaginal ultrasound, hysteroscopy, and dilatation and curettage in the diagnosis of abnormal vaginal bleeding and intrauterine pathology in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 9:277–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Allahbadia GN, Sheth SS (1996) Hysteroscopic surgery in infertility. Ind J Gynaecol Endosc 1:25–32Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Alborzi S, Parsanezhad ME, Mahmoodian N, Alborzi S, Alborzi M (2007) Sonohysterography versus transvaginal sonography for screening of patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 96:20–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Karageyim Karsidag AY, Buyukbayrak EE, Kars B, Unal O, Turan MC (2010) Transvaginal sonography, sonohysterography, and hysteroscopy for investigation of focal intrauterine lesions in women with recurrent postmenopausal bleeding after dilatation and curettage. Arch Gynecol Obstet 281:637–643PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Karaman Y, Bingol B, Gunenc Z, Akin O (2007) Enterobius vermicularis infection in uterine cavity mimicking endometrial cancer: a case report. Gynecol Surg 4:217–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kim AH, Mckay H, Keltz MD, Nelson HP, Adamson GD (1998) Sonohysterographic screening before in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 69:841–844PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Loverro G, Bettocchi S, Cormio G et al (1999) Transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy in postmenopausal uterine bleeding. Maturitas 33:139–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Cicinelli E, Tinelli R, Colafiglio G et al (2010) Risk of long-term pelvic recurrences after fluid minihysteroscopy in women with endometrial carcinoma: a controlled randomized study. Menopause 17:511–515PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Banu Bingol
    • 1
  • M. Ziya Gunenc
    • 2
  • Ali Gedikbasi
    • 3
  • Haldun Guner
    • 4
  • Seval Tasdemir
    • 5
  • Bulent Tiras
    • 4
  1. 1.IVF Center, Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale HospitalIstanbul Bilim UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyIstanbul Maltepe UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyIstanbul Bakirkoy Maternity and Children Diseases HospitalIstanbulTurkey
  4. 4.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyGazi UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  5. 5.Fertigyn, IVF CenterIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations