Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preceding cervical cytology in women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the preceding cervical cytology and factors leading to cytohistologic discrepancy in women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) histology.

Methods

The records of women who were found to have histologically confirmed HSIL without any associated invasive and glandular lesions, at Chiang Mai University Hospital between January 2005 and May 2009, were reviewed. Cytohistological discrepancy was defined as HSIL histology preceded by low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) smears.

Results

The records of 436 HSIL cases were reviewed. The mean age of the women was 45.0 ± 9.3 years. The preceding smear abnormalities were as follows: 275 (63.1%) with HSIL; 50 (11.5%) with atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H); 40 (9.2%) with squamous cell carcinoma; 35 (8.0%) with LSIL; 32 (7.3%) with ASC-US; and 4 (0.9) with glandular abnormality smears. Overall, the rate of cytohistological discrepancy was 15.4% (95% CI 12.1–19.1%). The small size of HSIL and presence of coexisting LSIL are significant independent predictors for cytohistologic discrepancy.

Conclusion

Approximately 15% of HSIL cases are under-diagnosed by cytology. Significant factors leading to cytohistologic discrepancy are lesion size and the presence of coexisting LSIL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kesic V (2009) Cervical preinvasive disease. In: Ayhan A, Gultekin M, Dursun P (eds) Textbook of gynaecological oncology. Gunes Publishing, Ankara, pp 15–20

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barton SE, Jenkins D, Hollingworth A, Cuzick J, Singer A (1989) An explanation for the problem of false-negative cervical smears. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 96(4):482–485

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta S, Sodhani P (2004) Why is high grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia under-diagnosed on cytology in a quarter of cases? Analysis of smear characteristics in discrepant cases. Indian J Cancer 41(3):104–108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lyall H, Duncan ID (1995) Inaccuracy of cytologic diagnosis in high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (CIN 3). Acta Cytol 39(1):50–54

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Massad LS, Behbakht K, Collins YC, Cejtin HE (2003) Histologic findings from the cervix among older women with abnormal cervical cytology. Gynecol Oncol 88(3):340–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tidbury P, Singer A, Jenkins D (1992) CIN 3: the role of lesion size in invasion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 99(7):583–586

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zuna RE, Sienko A, Lightfoot S, Gaiser M (2002) Cervical smear interpretations in women with a histologic diagnosis of severe dysplasia: factors associated with discrepant interpretations. Cancer 96(4):218–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jarmulowicz MR, Jenkins D, Barton SE, Goodall AL, Hollingworth A, Singer A (1989) Cytological status and lesion size: a further dimension in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 96(9):1061–1066

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Howell S, Theodor M, Pacey NF, Patwardhan JR, Ayer B (1997) Quality assurance in cytology. Rescreening of previously negative smears from high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Acta Cytol 41(4):1085–1090

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Alli PM, Ali SZ (2003) Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance—rule out high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: cytopathologic characteristics and clinical correlates. Diagn Cytopathol 28(6):308–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Barreth D, Schepansky A, Capstick V, Johnson G, Steed H, Faught W (2006) Atypical squamous cells-cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H): a result not to be ignored. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 28(12):1095–1098

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kietpeerakool C, Srisomboon J, Tantipalakorn C, Suprasert P, Khunamornpong S, Nimmanhaeminda K et al (2008) Underlying pathology of women with “atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion” smears, in a region with a high incidence of cervical cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 34(2):204–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Liman AK, Giampoli EJ, Bonfiglio TA (2005) Should women with atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, receive reflex human papillomavirus-DNA testing? Cancer 105(6):457–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McHale MT, Souther J, Elkas JC, Monk BJ, Harrison TA (2007) Is atypical squamous cells that cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion clinically significant? J Low Genit Tract Dis 11(2):86–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Saad RS, Dabbs DJ, Kordunsky L, Kanbour-Shakir A, Silverman JF, Liu Y et al (2006) Clinical significance of cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high grade, in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Pathol 126(3):381–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chumnan Kietpeerakool.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Songveeratham, S., Kietpeerakool, C., Khunamornpong, S. et al. Preceding cervical cytology in women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Arch Gynecol Obstet 283, 1381–1384 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1581-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1581-3

Keywords

Navigation