Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Investigation of the factors affecting the perinatal outcome of monochorionic diamniotic twins

  • Materno-fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the factors affecting the perinatal outcome in monochorionic diamniotic (MD) twins.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of MD twins treated in our hospital between April 1, 2006 and February 28, 2010. The neonatal outcomes of MD twins conceived by assisted reproductive technology or ovulation induction were compared to the outcomes of those conceived naturally.

Results

In MD twins with twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), fetoscopic laser photocoagulation (FLP) resulted in the survival of at least one twin. In naturally conceived MD twins with two live births, we found that there was a higher discordance rate and the incidence of intrauterine growth retardation was higher in twins born to nulliparous women than multiparous women.

Conclusions

Further FLP treatment can be performed on twins with TTTS so that prognosis may be improved. Since the risk of discordant growth is significantly greater in twins of nulliparous women, they should be monitored more carefully than multiparous women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Khalaf Y, El-Toukhy T, Coomarasamy A, Kamal A, Bolton V, Braude P (2008) Selective single blastocyst transfer reduces the multiple pregnancy rate and increases pregnancy rates: a pre- and post-intervention study. BJOG 115:385–390. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01584.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Skiadas CC, Missmer SA, Benson CB, Gee RE, Racowsky C (2008) Risk factors associated with pregnancies containing a monochorionic pair following assisted reproductive technologies. Hum Reprod 23:1366–1371. doi:10.1093/humrep/den045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sugiyama R, Nakagawa K, Nishi Y, Sugiyama R, Ezaki K, Inoue M (2009) The dilemma faced by patients who undergo single embryo transfer. RMB 8:33–37. doi:10.1007/s12522-008-0006-5

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blickstein I, Jones C, Keith LG (2003) Zygotic-splitting rates after single-embryo transfers in in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 348:2366–2367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Helmerhorst FM, Perquin DA, Donker D, Keirse MJ (2004) Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ 328:261–265. doi:10.1136/bmj.37957.560278.EE

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ho CH, Peng FS, Chen HF, Lien YR, Chen SU, Yang YS (2005) Twin pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology: maternal and perinatal outcomes. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 44:332–337. doi:10.1016/S1028-4559(09)60166-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Delbaere I, Verstraelen H, Goetgeluk S, Martens G, Derom C, De Bacquer D, De Backer G, Temmerman M (2008) Perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies in women of advanced age. Hum Reprod 23:2145–2150. doi:10.1093/humrep/den134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carroll SG, Tyfield L, Reeve L, Porter H, Soothill P, Kyle PM (2005) Is zygosity or chorionicity the main determinant of fetal outcome in twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:757–761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dubè J, Dodds L, Armson B (2002) Does chorionicity or zygosity predict adverse perinatal outcomes in twins? Am J Obstet Gynecol 186:579–583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lopriore E, Ortibus E, Acosta-Rojas R, Le Cessie S, Middeldorp JM, Oepkes D, Gratacos E, Vandenbussche FP, Deprest J, Walther FJ, Lewi L (2009) Risk factors for neurodevelopment impairment in twin–twin transfusion syndrome treated with fetoscopic laser surgery. Obstet Gynecol 113((2 Pt 1)):361–366. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e318195873e

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ruano R, Brizot Mde L, Liao AW, Zugaib M (2009) Selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation of superficial placental anastomoses for the treatment of severe twin–twin transfusion syndrome. Clinics 64:91–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Demissie K, Ananth CV, Martin J, Hanley ML, MacDorman MF, Rhoads GG (2002) Fetal and neonatal mortality among twin gestations in the United States: the role of intrapair birth weight discordance. Obstet Gynecol 100:474–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hack KE, Koopman-Esseboom C, Derks JB, Elias SG, de Kleine MJ, Baerts W, Go AT, Schaap AH, van der Hoeven MA, Eggink AJ, Sollie KM, Weisglas-Kuperus N, A Visser GH (2009) Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of monochorionic and matched dichorionic twins. PLoS One 4(8):e6815

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masahiro Murakami.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murakami, M., Iwasa, T., Kiyokawa, M. et al. Investigation of the factors affecting the perinatal outcome of monochorionic diamniotic twins. Arch Gynecol Obstet 283, 1239–1243 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1549-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1549-3

Keywords

Navigation