Advertisement

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 282, Issue 1, pp 69–73 | Cite as

Residual and recurrent disease rates following LEEP treatment in high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions

  • Ali Baloglu
  • Dilek Uysal
  • Incim Bezircioglu
  • Merve Bicer
  • Ayşegul Inci
Gynecologic Oncology

Abstract

Introduction

Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) is a basic procedure in the conization performed on patients with CIN II/III. After excisional therapy, close follow up is essential for the earlier detection of residual and recurrent disease. The value of PAP-smear and HPV-DNA tests for investigation of residual and recurrent disease in patients diagnosed with high-grade intraepithelial lesion after LEEP treatment was purposed.

Materials and methods

42 patients were included in the study for whom epithelial cell anomalies were detected at PAP-smear screening. HPV-DNA test, colposcopy, cervical biopsy and endocervical curettage and then LEEP procedures were performed. The patients were followed with HPV DNA and PAP-smear tests in terms of recurrence and residual disease at 3-month intervals.

Results

HPV-DNA examination revealed that 36 patients (85.7%) were positive for high-risk HPV-DNA before treatment. Histopathological evaluation of LEEP materials revealed the presence of CIN I in 4 and CIN II/III in 38 patients. Surgical margin was positive in five patients. No sign of invasive cervical neoplasia was detected. The high-risk HPV DNA’s persistence was observed in 11 (30.6%) of the 36 patients of whom HPV-DNA positivity had been detected before the treatment. HSIL was detected in four patients using PAP-smear on the third month examination. Positive LEEP surgical margins were found to be positively correlated both with HPV-DNA positivity detected during the follow-up examination and with the presence of residual disease in the follow-up PAP smear.

Conclusion

LEEP is a basic procedure in the conization performed on patients with CIN II/III. In spite of high recurrence and residual disease rates, this kind of patients requires close monitoring. Follow-up with HPV and PAP-smear tests after LEEP treatment is of great importance in the detection of residual or recurrent disease.

Keywords

Loop electrosurgical excision procedure High-grade cervical intraepithelial lesion Human papillomavirus PAP smear 

Notes

Conflict of interest statement

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Alonso I, Torné A, Puig-Tintoré LM, Esteve R, Quinto L (2007) High-risk cervical epithelial neoplasia grade 1 treated by loop electrosurgical excision procedure: follow-up and value of HPV testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:359.e1–359.e6Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Debarge VH, Collinet P, Vinatier D, Ego A, Dewilde A, Boman F, Leroy JL (2003) Value of human papillomavirus testing after conisation by loop electrosurgical excision for high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Gynecol Oncol 90:587–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Park YJ, Lee KH, Dong SM, Kang S, Park SY, Seo SS (2008) The association OD pre-conization high-risk HPV load and the persistence of HPV infection and persistence/recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after conization. Gynecol Oncol 108:549–554CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bae JH, Kim CJ, Park TC, Namkoong SE, Park JS (2007) Persistence of human papillomavirus as a predictor for treatment failure after loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Int J Gynecol Cancer 17:1271–1277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Janicek MF, Averette HE (2001) Cervical cancer; prevention, diagnosis and therapeutics. CA Cancer J Clin 51:92–114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Solomon D, Schiffman M, Tarone R, ALTS Study Group (2001) Comparison of three management strategies for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: baseline results from a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:293–299CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lindeque BG (2005) Management of cervical premalignant lesions. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gyneacol 19:545–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sarian LO, Derchain SF, Andrade LA, Tambascia J, Morais SS, Syrjanen KJ (2004) HPV DNA test Pap smear in detection of residual and recurrent disease following loop electrosurgical excision procedure of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol 94:181–186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Murta EF, Conti R, Rodovalho J, Barcelos AC, Adad SJ, de Souza H (2004) Outcome after treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: relation between colposcopically directed biopsy, conization and cervical loop excision. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 25:587–590PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sankasem A, Thavaramara T, Manusirivithaya S, Tangjitgamol S (2006) Tumor persistence in high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion patients with positive surgical margin post loop electrosurgical excision procedure. J Med Assoc Thai 89:934–940PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kjellberg L, Tavelin B (2007) ‘See and treat’ regime by LEEP conisation is a safe and time saving procedure among women with cytological high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 86:1140–1144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kietpeerakool C, Khunamornpong S, Srisomboon J, Siriaunkgul S, Suprasert P (2007) Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II-III with endocervical cone margin involvement after cervical loop conization: is there any predictor for residual disease? J Obstet Gynaecol Res 33:660–664CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baldauf JJ, Dreyfus M, Wertz JP, Cuenin C, Ritter J, Philippe E (1997) Consequences and treatment of cervical stenoses after laser conization or loop electrosurgical excision. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 26:64–70Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tyler LN, Andrews N, Parrish RS, Hazlett LJ, Korourian S (2007) Significance of margin and extent of dysplasia in loop electrosurgery excision procedure biopsies performed for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in predicting persistent disease. Arch Pathol Lab Med 131:622–624PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Prato B, Ghelardi A, Gadducci A, Marchetti I, Di Cristofano C, Di Coscio G, Bevilacqua G, Genazzani AR (2008) Correlation of recurrence rates and times with posttreatment human papillomavirus status in patients treated with loop electrosurgical excision procedure conization for cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions. Int J Gynecol Cancer 18:90–94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sandri MT, Riggo D, Salvatici M, Passerini R, Zorzino L, Boveri S, Radice D, Spolti N, Sideri M (2009) Typing of human papillomavirus in women with cervical lesions: prevalence and distribution of different genotypes. J Med Virol 81:271–277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Venturoli S, Ambreti S, Cricca M, Leo E, Costa S, Musiani M, Zerbini M (2008) Correlation of high-risk human papillomavirus genotypes persistence and risk of residual or recurrent cervical disease after surgical treatment. J Med Virol 80:1434–1440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Castle PE, Stoler MH, Solomon D, Schiffman M (2007) The relationship of community biopsy-diagnosed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 to the quality control pathology-reviewed diagnoses: an ALTS report. Am J Clin Pathol 127:805–815CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali Baloglu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dilek Uysal
    • 1
  • Incim Bezircioglu
    • 1
  • Merve Bicer
    • 1
  • Ayşegul Inci
    • 1
  1. 1.1st Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyIzmir Ataturk Training and Research HospitalIzmirTurkey
  2. 2.IzmirTurkey

Personalised recommendations