Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Best evidence continuous medical education

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Health care professionals need to approach their profession with a view to life long learning. They need to develop a strategy to meet their learning needs in a reflective and effective manner. Continuous medical educational (CME) is the traditional tool for learning and updating knowledge. Most of them are in the forms of courses, conferences, journal clubs and workshops. They are mostly didactic sessions and evidence suggests that they are not effective to improve the clinical skills and attitude. Systematic review of teaching evidence-based medicine shows that interactive and clinically integrated learning is the most effective form of learning. It enhances knowledge and skills. Professionals should view CME in a holistic manner in the context of continuous professional development (CPD) and even in the wider concept of knowledge translation, which encompasses both CME and CPD. e Learning is one of the most important forms of non-traditional CME. It provides an efficient and increasingly interactive delivery system that can handle complex and layered information. More work needs to be done to see its effectiveness for practising clinicians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS (1996) Evidence based medicine. What it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 312:71–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Milton P et al (2000) Continuing professional development. Report of a working party (RCOG, UK). RCOG Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davis D, Evans M, Jadad A, Perrier L, Rath D, Ryan D et al (2003) The case for knowledge translation: shortening the journey from evidence to effect. BMJ 327:33–35. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7405.33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Davis D, O’Brien MA, Freemantle N, Wolf FM, Mazmanian P, Taylor-Vaisey A (1999) Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behaviour or health care outcomes. JAMA 282:867–874. doi:10.1001/jama.282.9.867

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Thomson O’Brien MA, Freemantle N, Oxman AD, Wolf F, Davis DA, Herrin J (2001) Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD003030

  6. Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB (1995) Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA 274:700–705. doi:10.1001/jama.274.9.700

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wutoh R, Boren SA, Balas EA (2004) e Learning: a review of internet-based continuing medical education. J Contin Educ Health Prof 24:20–30. doi:10.1002/chp.1340240105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Coomarasamy A, Khan KS (2004) What is the evidence that postgraduate teaching in evidence based medicine changes anything? A systematic review. BMJ 329:1017. doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7473.1017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sackett DL, Straus SE (1998) Finding and applying evidence during clinical rounds: the “evidence cart”. JAMA 280:1336–1338. doi:10.1001/jama.280.15.1336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Deshpande N, Publicover M, Gee H, Khan KS (2003) Incorporating the views of obstetric clinicians in implementing evidence-supported labour and delivery suite ward rounds: a case study. Health Info Libr J 20:86–94. doi:10.1046/j.1471-1842.2003.00422.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dwarakanath LS, Khan KS (2000) Modernizing the journal club. Hosp Med 61:425–427

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, Mowatt G, Fraser C, Bero L et al (2001) Changing provider behaviour: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care 39:II2–II45. doi:10.1097/00005650-200108002-00002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis DA, Haynes RB (1995) No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. CMAJ 153:1423–1431

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

There is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amer Raza.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raza, A., Coomarasamy, A. & Khan, K.S. Best evidence continuous medical education. Arch Gynecol Obstet 280, 683–687 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-1128-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-1128-7

Keywords

Navigation