Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A new technique for the diagnosis of fallopian tube patency by using hysteroscopy with ultrasound compared with hysterosalpingography in infertile women

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the effectiveness of hysteroscopy as a method for the diagnosis of tubal patency using saline distention media.

Methods

In this prospective study, 62 women between 21 and 38 years with a history of at least 1 year of infertility who underwent hysteroscopy and hysterosalpingography (HSG) on two consecutive cycles were studied. Transvaginal ultrasonography carried out before and after hysteroscopy in order to measure the abdominal fluid (in ml) in the peritoneal cavity of the cul-de-sac. The difference between the two results was calculated. A next cycle HSG was performed and patients were divided into three groups according to whether there was no tubal occlusion (group 1), a unilateral occlusion (group 2) or a bilateral occlusion (group 3): Peritoneal fluid measurements were compared among the three groups. Finally, pain and discomfort were recorded at the end of the process.

Results

According to the HSG, 34 women were in group 1, 13 in group 2 and 9 in group 3. Peritoneal fluid measurements were 6.88 ± 2.7 ml in group 1, 4.21 ± 0.9 ml in group 2 and 1.08 ± 0.7 ml in group 3. Statistical differences were found between groups 1 and 3 and between groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.05). All of the patients reported significantly less pain during hysteroscopy in response to HSG.

Conclusions

Using saline distension media during hysteroscopic evaluation was effective to allow measurement of the accumulating fluid in the peritoneal cavity and to confirm at least one patent tube with minimal pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shah SM, Towobola OA, Masihleho M (2005) Diagnosis of fallopian tube patency. East Afr Med J 82(9):457–462

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Horowitz E, Orvieto R, Rabinerson D, Yoeli R, Bar-Hava I (2006) Hysteroscopy combined with hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy): a new modality for comprehensive evaluation of the female pelvic organs. Gynecol Endocrinol 22(4):225–229. doi:10.1080/09513590600647359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamilton JA, Larson AJ, Lower AM, Hasnain S, Grudzinskas JG (1998) Evaluation of the performance of hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography in 500 consecutive unselected infertile women. Hum Reprod 13(6):1519–1526. doi:10.1093/humrep/13.6.1519

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cimen G, Trak B, Elpek G, Simsek T, Erman O (1999) The efficiency of hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy) in the evaluation of tubal patency. J Obstet Gynaecol 19(5):516–518. doi:10.1080/01443619964346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cicinelli E, Matteo M, Causio F, Schonauer LM, Pinto V, Galantino P (2001) Tolerability of the mini-pan-endocsopic approach (transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy and minihysteroscopy) versus hysterosalpingography in an outpatient infertility investigation. Fertil Steril 76(5):1048–1051. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02856-4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. March CM, Israel R (1987) Hysteroscopic management of recurrent abortion caused by the septate uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156:834–842

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Valle RF (1980) Hysteroscopy in the evaluation of female infertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 317:425–431

    Google Scholar 

  8. Golan A, Ron-El R, Herman A et al (1992) Diagnostic hysteroscopy: its value in an in vitro fertilization transfer unit. Hum Reprod 7:1433–1434

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bettocchi S, Selvaggi L (1997) A vaginoscopic approach to reduce the pain of office hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 4:255–258. doi:10.1016/S1074-3804(97)80019-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Speroff L, Fritz MA (2005) Clinical gynecological endocrinology and infertility, 7th edn. Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1013–1067

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miller JH, Weinberg RK, Canino NL, Klein NA, Soules MR (1999) The pattern of infertility diagnoses in women of advanced reproductive age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:952–957. doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70331-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Richman TS, Viscomi GN, deCherney A, Polan ML, Alcebo LO (1984) Fallopian tubal patency assessed by ultrasound following fluid injection. Radiology 152:507–510

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Campbell S, Bourne TH, Tan SL, Collins WP (1994) Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy) and its future role within the investigation of infertility in Europe. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 4:254–263. doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1994.04030245.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ayida G, Harris P, Kennedy S, Seif M, Barlow D, Chamberlain P (1996) Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy) using Echovist-200 in the outpatient investigation of infertility patients. Br J Radiol 69:910–913

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Freiberg B, Joergensen C (1994) Tubal patency studied by ultrasonography: a pilot study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 73:53–55. doi:10.3109/00016349409013394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sankpal RS, Confino E, Matzel A, Cohen LS (2001) Investigation of the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes using three-dimensional saline sonohysterosalpingography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 73:125–129. doi:10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00363-0

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Randolph JR, Ying YK, Maier DB, Schmidt CL, Riddick DH, Randolph JR Jr (1986) Comparison, of real-time ultrasonography, hysterosalpingography, and laparoscopy/hysteroscopy in evaluation of uterine abnormalities and tubal patency. Fertil Steril 46:828–832

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dijkman AB, Mol BW, van der Veen F, Bossuyt PM, Hogerzeil HV (2000) Can hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography replace hysterosalpingography in the assessment of tubal subfertility? Eur J Radiol 35:44–48. doi:10.1016/S0720-048X(99)00127-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Exacoustos C, Zupi E, Carusotti C, Lanzi G, Marconi D, Arduini D (2003) Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography compared with hysterosalpingography and laparoscopic dye pertubation to evaluate tubal patency. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 10:367–372. doi:10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60264-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Alborzi S, Dehbashi S, Khodaee R (2003) Sonohysterosalpingographic screening for infertile patients. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 82:57–62. doi:10.1016/S0020-7292(02)00417-4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Radic V, Canic T, Valetic J, Duic Z (2005) Advantages and disadvantages of hysterosonosalpingography in the assessment of the reproductive status of uterine cavity and fallopian tubes. Eur J Radiol 53:268–273. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.02.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Holz K, Becker R, Schurmann R (1997) Ultrasound in the investigation of tubal patency: a meta-analysis of three comparative studies of Echovist-200 including 1,007 women. Zentralbl Gynakol 119:366–373

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Cemil Topuzlu C. 103/15 Caddebostan, Istanbul, Turkey

    Begum Yildizhan, F. Durmusoglu, M. Uygur & M. Erenus

Authors
  1. Begum Yildizhan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. Durmusoglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Uygur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Erenus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Begum Yildizhan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yildizhan, B., Durmusoglu, F., Uygur, M. et al. A new technique for the diagnosis of fallopian tube patency by using hysteroscopy with ultrasound compared with hysterosalpingography in infertile women. Arch Gynecol Obstet 280, 543–547 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-0953-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-0953-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation