Skip to main content
Log in

What happens when vacuum extraction fails?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes of forceps delivery or cesarean section (CS) following failed vacuum extraction.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of all women who underwent forceps delivery and/or CS after failed vacuum extraction in 1993–2006 was conducted. Cases were identified by searching the computerized delivery discharge database. All files were reviewed and those who underwent CS were compared to those who underwent forceps delivery.

Results

Compared to CS (n = 112), forceps delivery (n = 328) was associated with a significantly higher risk of adverse composite maternal outcome (P = 0.001), third/fourth-degree perineal tears (P = 0.005), prolonged hospitalization (P = 0.03), and cephalohematoma (P = 0.04). In the forceps group, the risk was increased by nulliparity, occipito-posterior position, S + 1 station, and pre-pregnancy maternal obesity; in the cesarean group, higher maternal risk was associated with delivery in the evening/night and S + 2 or lower. In cases of nonreassuring fetal heart rate, composite neonatal outcome was worse after CS.

Conclusion

Forceps delivery after failed vacuum extraction may be associated with greater short-term maternal morbidity than CS, although it might be associated with better perinatal outcome in cases of nonreassuring fetal heart rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Towner D, Castro MA, Eby-Wilkens E, Gilbert WM (1999) Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury. N Engl J Med 341:1709–1714. doi:10.1056/NEJM199912023412301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Kadri H, Sabr Y, Al-Saif S, Abulaimoun B, Ba’Aqeel H, Saleh A (2003) Failed individual and sequential instrumental vaginal delivery: contributing risk factors and maternal–neonatal complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82:642–648. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00162.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Kirmeyer S (2006) Births: final data for 2004. Natl Vital Stat Rep 55:1–101

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fauveau V (2006) Is vacuum extraction still known, taught and practiced? A worldwide KAP survey. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 94:185–189. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.01.033

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sheiner E, Shoham-Vardi I, Silberstein T, Hallak M, Katz M, Mazor M (2001) Failed vacuum extraction: maternal risk factors and pregnancy outcome. J Reprod Med 46:819–824

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Damron DP, Capeless EL (2004) Operative vaginal delivery: a comparison of forceps and vacuum for success rate and risk of rectal sphincter injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:907–910. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheong YC, Abdullahi H, Lashen H, Fairlie FM (2004) Can formal education and training improve the outcome of instrumental delivery? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 113:139–144. doi:10.1016/S0301-2115(03)00340-3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Revah A, Ezra Y, Farine D, Ritchie K (1997) Failed trial of vacuum or forceps—maternal and fetal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 176:200–204. doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(97)80036-1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sadan O, Ginath S, Gomel A, Abramov D, Rotmensch S, Boaz M, Glezerman M (2003) What to do after a failed attempt of vacuum delivery? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 107:151–155. doi:10.1016/S0301-2115(02)00344-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dystocia and augmentation of labor (2003) ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 49

  11. Operative vaginal delivery (2000) ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 17

  12. Eisenkop SM, Richman R, Platt LD, Paul RH (1982) Urinary tract injury during cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 60:591–596

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Phipps MG, Watabe B, Clemons JL, Weitzen S, Myers DL (2005) Risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 105:156–160

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bhide A, Guven M, Prefumo F, Vankalayapati P, Thilaganathan B (2007) Maternal and neonatal outcome after failed ventouse delivery: comparison of forceps versus cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 20:541–545. doi:10.1080/14767050701412297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ben-Haroush A, Melamed N, Kaplan B, Yogev Y (2007) Predictors of failed operative vaginal delivery: a single-center experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:308 e1–e5

    Google Scholar 

  16. Edozien LC, Williams JL, Chatterjee IC, Hirsch PJ (1999) Failed instrumental delivery: how safe is the use of a second instrument? J Obstet Gynaecol 19:460–462. doi:10.1080/01443619964599

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Avi Ben-Haroush.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Melamed, N., Yogev, Y., Stainmetz, S. et al. What happens when vacuum extraction fails?. Arch Gynecol Obstet 280, 243–248 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-008-0902-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-008-0902-2

Keywords

Navigation