Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the galactographic findings taken with digital mammography and to compare the findings between benign and malignant breast diseases.
Materials and methods
Galactographic findings were retrospectively analyzed and compared with histopathological results for 42 patients who showed abnormal findings on galactography and had histologically proven diagnoses between January 2005 and March 2008. A galactography was acquired using full-field digital mammography (Hologic Lorad Selenia; Danbury, USA). The difference in galactographic findings between malignant and benign breast diseases was analyzed using χ2 test. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Of the total 42 cases, 11 cases were malignant breast diseases and 31 were benign diseases. Common galactographic findings of benign diseases include ductal obstruction (48.3%) and single filling defect (51.6%), and common findings for malignant tumor include ductal dilatation (72.7%) and stenosis (63.6%). Ductal stenosis, microcalcifications or mass adjacent to abnormal duct, multiple filling defects, ductal wall irregularity, ductal distortion and irregular filling defects were more prevalently seen in malignant cases. A single filling defect and lobular filling defect was more prevalently seen in benign cases (P < 0.05). Ductal dilatation was a common finding in both malignant and benign cases with no significant difference.
Conclusions
Ductal lesions were well visualized on galactography acquired with a digital mammography. A preoperative diagnostic galactography is useful in making a differential diagnosis between benign diseases and malignant tumors in patients with pathologic nipple discharge.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Leis HP (1989) Management of nipple discharge. World J Surg 13:735–742. doi:10.1007/BF01658424
Cho N, Moon WK, Chung SY et al (2005) Ductographic findings of breast cancer. Korean J Radiol 6:31–36
Tabar L, Dean PB, Pentek Z (1983) Galactography: the diagnostic procedure of choice for nipple discharge. Radiology 149:31–38
Kopans DB (2006) Breast Imaging, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
Hou MF, Huang TJ, Liu GC (2001) The diagnostic value of galactography in patients with nipple discharge. Clin Imaging 25:75–81. doi:10.1016/S0899-7071(01)00256-X
Chung SY, Lee KW, Park KS et al (1995) Breast tumors associated with nipple discharge. Correlation of findings on galactography and sonography. Clin Imaging 19:165–171. doi:10.1016/0899-7071(93)00007-L
Sickles EA (2000) Galactography and other imaging investigations of nipple discharge. Lancet 11(356):1622–1623. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03150-0
Del Turco MR, Mantellini P, Ciatto S et al (2007) Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:860–866. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.2303
Dinkel HP, Trusen A, Gassel AM et al (2000) Predictive value of galactographic patterns for benign and malignant neoplasms of the breast in patients with nipple discharge. Br J Radiol 73:706–714
Slawson SH, Johnson BA (2001) Ductography: how to and what if? Radiographics 21:133–150
Cho N, Oh KK, Cho HY (2003) Galactographic differentiation between malignant and benign disease in patients with pathologic nipple discharge. J Korean Radiol Soc 48:511–516
Alberti GP, Troiso A (1982) Secreting breast: the role of galactography. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 3:96–100
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, S.H., Cha, E.S., Kim, H.S. et al. Galactography acquired with digital mammography in patients with nipple discharge: a retrospective analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 280, 217–222 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-008-0897-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-008-0897-8