Skip to main content
Log in

Amniocentesis in twin pregnancies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To describe the experiences in diagnostic amniocentesis in twin pregnancies.

Methods

The computerized database and medical records of pregnant women attending Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit of the hospital for diagnostic amniocentesis at 16–20 weeks gestation between January 1992 and December 2006 were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

During 15 years of experience, 7,890 amniocenteses at 16–20 weeks gestation were performed for prenatal diagnosis, including 174 procedures in 87 twin pregnancies. The mean gestational age at the time of amniocentesis was 17.13 ± 3.35 weeks. Preterm birth rate defined as the delivery before 36 gestational weeks was 36.24%. The total fetal loss rate was 5.17%, however, the procedure related fetal loss within 2 weeks after the procedure was 1.15%.

Conclusion

Based on our limited data and previous studies, we can counsel patients undergoing twin amniocentesis at mid-trimester that the fetal loss rate may be slightly higher than that of singleton amniocentesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kogan MD, Alexander GR, Kotelchuck M, MacDorman MF, Buekens P, Martin JA et al (2000) Trends in twin birth outcomes and prenatal care utilization in the United States, 1981–1997. JAMA 284(3):335–341. doi:10.1001/jama.284.3.335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Weisz B, Rodeck CH (2005) Invasive diagnostic procedures in twin pregnancies. Prenat Diagn 25(9):751–758. doi:10.1002/pd.1263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Appelman Z, Furman B (2005) Invasive genetic diagnosis in multiple pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 32(1):97–103, ix. doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2004.10.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghidini A, Lynch L, Hicks C, Alvarez M, Lockwood CJ (1993) The risk of second-trimester amniocentesis in twin gestations: a case-control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 169(4):1013–1016

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yukobowich E, Anteby EY, Cohen SM, Lavy Y, Granat M, Yaget S (2001) Risk of fetal loss in twin pregnancies undergoing second trimester amniocentesis (1). Obstet Gynecol 98(2):231–234. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01416-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pruggmayer MR, Jahoda MG, Van der Pol JG, Baumann P, Holzgreve W, Karkut G et al (1992) Genetic amniocentesis in twin pregnancies: results of a multicenter study of 529 cases. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2(1):6–10. doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1992.02010006.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tongprasert F, Tongsong T, Wanapirak C, Sirirchotiyakul S, Piyamongkol W (2007) Cordocentesis in multifetal pregnancies. Prenat Diagn 27:1100–1103. doi:10.1002/pd.1836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tongsong T, Wanapirak C, Sirivatanapa P, Piyamongkol W, Sirichotiyakul S, Yampochai A (1998) Amniocentesis-related fetal loss: a cohort study. Obstet Gynecol 92(1):64–67. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00125-2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theera Tongsong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Supadilokluck, S., Tongprasert, F., Tongsong, T. et al. Amniocentesis in twin pregnancies. Arch Gynecol Obstet 280, 207–209 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-008-0894-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-008-0894-y

Keywords

Navigation