Abstract
Background
We describe a case that developed a delayed pneumothorax after laparoscopic surgery.
Case
A 40-year-old woman (BMI: 19.1) underwent a laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy. On the first postoperative day, she developed a pneumothorax. The subcutaneous CO2 tracked up through the fascial planes, and ruptured into the pleural space, where delayed pneumothorax developed.
Conclusion
Gynecologists should be aware of pneumothorax after laparoscopic surgery and should also keep in mind its possible delayed development.
References
Rittenmeyer H (1994) Carbon dioxide toxicity related to a laparoscopic procedure. J Post Anesth Nurs 9:157–161
Murdock CM, Wolff AJ, van Geem T (2000) Risk factors for hypercarbia, subcutaneous emphysema, pneumothorax, and pneumomediastinum during laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 95:704–709. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(00)00781-X
Wolf JS, Monk TG, McDougall EM, McClennan BL, Clayman RV (1995) The extraperitoneal approach and subcutaneous emphysema are associated with greater absorption of carbon dioxide during laparoscopic renal surgery. J Urol 154:959–963. doi:10.1097/00005392-199509000-00010
Ferzli GS, Hurwitz JB, Hallak A, Fiorillo MA, Kiel T (1997) Pneumothorax as a complication of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 11:152–153. doi:10.1007/s004649900320
Bartelmaos T, Blanc R, De Claviere G, Benhamou D (2005) Delayed pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax complicating laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. J Clin Anesth 17:209–212. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.05.009
Salihoglu Z, Demiroluk S, Demirkiran O, Cakmakkaya S, Aydogan F, Carkman S, Kose Y (2008) The effects of pneumothorax on the respiratory mechanics during laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18:423–427. doi:10.1089/lap.2007.0097
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mekaru, K., Yagi, C., Uezato, T. et al. Delayed pneumothorax after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 280, 157–159 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-008-0866-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-008-0866-2