Abstract
Introduction
Can ultrasonography be performed in pregnant women as a screening test to predict IUGR? To justify its use, it must have a high enough positive predictive value.
Materials and methods
This study addresses the concept of early prediction of IUGR using echographic measurements in the first trimester. We studied one traditional and one new marker, the crown–rump length (CRL) and the cerebro-corporal coefficient (CCC). We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 139 pregnancies that gave birth to babies with IUGR and 25 charts of normal pregnancies that made the control group. Screening in the first trimester of pregnancy was done in 125 (89.9%) pregnant women between 10 and 14 weeks. We calculated the diagnostic and predictive values of these two parameters in IUGR.
Results
The sensitivity and specificity for reduced CRL were 29 and 100%, respectively, and for the CCC > 0.6, 46 and 100%, respectively. Using IUGR prevalence (10%) and the Bayes equation we calculated the positive predictive value of reduced CRL and >0.6 CCC in general, moderate and severe IUGR and severe IUGR alone. They were 1, 1, 9%, 13, 19 and 29%, respectively.
Conclusion
The positive predictive value of the crown–rump length and the cerebro-corporal coefficient for IUGR in the general population increases with the severity of the disease. Using these two parameters, however, would be more useful in high-risk pregnancies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Creasy RK, Resnik R, Iams JD (2003) Maternal-fetal medicine: principles and practice, 5th edn. Saunders, ISBN 0721600042
Rosenberg K, Grant JM, Tweedie I, Aitchison T, Gallagher F (1982) Measurement of fundal height as a screening test for fetal growth retardation. BJOG 89:447–450. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb03634.x
Villar J, Belizan JM (1986) The evaluation of the methods used in the diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation. Obstet Gynecol Surv 41:187–199. doi:10.1097/00006254-198604000-00001
Leung TY, Sahota DS, Chan LW, Law LW, Fung TY, Leung TN et al (2008) Prediction of birth weight by fetal crown–rump length and maternal serum levels of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A in the first trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31(1):10–14. doi:10.1002/uog.5206
Abramchenko VV, Shabalov NP (2004) Clinical perinatology. Intellect Publications, Petrozavodsk
Medvedev MV (2002) Ultrasound fetometry: reference tables and nomograms. Real Time Publications, Moscow
Ewigman BG (1989) Should ultrasound be used routinely during pregnancy? An opposing view. J Fam Pract 29(6):660–664
Shinozuka N, Taguchi A (2006) Ultrasound diagnosis and management of intra-uterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Rev Obstet Gynecol 6(3–4):157–162. doi:10.1080/14722240600785901
Mark H Ebell (1999) An introduction to information mastery 1999. Internet: http://www.poems.msu.edu/InfoMastery/
Kay H (2008) Fetal intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). The Institute for Advanced Medical Education. Cited, February. URL: http://www.iame.com/learning/IUGR/iugr_content.html
Altman DG, Bland JM (1994) Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values. BMJ 309(6947):102
High-risk pregnancy intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). University of Virginia Health System. Cited, February 2008. URL: http://www.healthsystem.virginia.edu/uvahealth/peds_hrpregnant/iugr.cfm
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Walid, M.S., Pomortsev, A.V. Early screening for IUGR: comparison of two related echographic markers. Arch Gynecol Obstet 279, 551–556 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-008-0779-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-008-0779-0