Skip to main content
Log in

Pregnancies complicated by adnexal masses: a case series

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Adnexal masses ≥5 cm in diameter are rare during pregnancy.

Materials and methods

We present our experience on six pregnant women with adnexal masses diagnosed and operated during pregnancy and/or at the time of cesarean section.

Results

Carefully selected cases with a unilateral mass and a solid component with normal tumor marker result can be followed until term and adnexectomy can be performed during cesarean section. On the contrary, gross adnexal masses, even with normal tumor marker levels should be operated when diagnosed, but these women might deliver small for gestational age infants.

Conclusion

By depending upon restricted criteria according to tumor markers, ultrasound or other radiological imaging techniques, some patients with an adnexal mass carrying an important risk factor for malignancy may be overlooked.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Swensen RE, Goff BA, Koh W-J, et al (2005) Cancer in the pregnant patient. In: Hoskins WJ, Perez CA, Young RC (eds) Principles of gynecologic oncology, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1279–1311

    Google Scholar 

  2. Duic Z, Kukura V, Ciglar S, Podobnik M, Podgajski M (2002). Adnexal masses in pregnancy: a review of eight cases undergoing surgical management. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 23(2):133–134

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schmeler KM, Mayo-Smith WW, Peipert JF, Weitzen S, Manuel MD, Gordinier ME (2005). Adnexal masses in pregnancy: surgery compared with observation. Obstet Gynecol 105(5 Pt 1):1098–1103

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chiang G, Levine D (2004). Imaging of adnexal masses in pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 23(6):805–819

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boulay R, Podczaski E (1998). Ovarian cancer complicating pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 25(2):385–399

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sayın NC, Varol FG, Balkanlı-Kaplan P, Sayın M (2004). Oral nifedipine maintenance therapy after acute intravenous tocolysis in preterm labor. J Perinat Med 32(3):220–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kontopoulos EV, Oyelese Y, Nath C, Schwebel M, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM (2005). Maternal anterior sacral meningocele in pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 17(6):423–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumari I, Kaur S, Mohan H, Huria A (2006). Adnexal masses in pregnancy: a 5-year review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 46(1):52–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Whitecar MP, Turner S, Higby MK (1999). Adnexal masses in pregnancy: a review of 130 cases undergoing surgical management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181(1):19–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Platek DN, Henderson CE, Goldberg GL (1995). The management of a persistent adnexal mass in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173(4):1236–1240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Usui R, Minakami H, Kosuge S, Iwasaki R, Ohwada M, Sato I (2000). A retrospective survey of clinical, pathologic, and prognostic features of adnexal masses operated on during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 26(2):89–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sherer DM, Maitland CY, Levine NF, Eisenberg C, Abulafia O (2000). Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging assisting in differentiating between large degenerating intramural leiomyoma and complex adnexal mass during pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Med 9(3):186–189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Curtis M, Hopkins MP, Zarlingo T, Martino C, Graciansky-Lengyl M, Jenison EL (1993). Magnetic resonance imaging to avoid laparotomy in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 82(5):833–836

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lenke RR (1983). Simple cyst of the kidney presenting as an adnexal mass in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 145(7):888–889

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ibraheim M, Ikomi A, Khan F (2005). A pelvic retroperitoneal schwannoma mimicking an ovarian dermoid cyst in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol 25(6):620–621

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mathevet P, Nessah K, Dargent D, Mellier G (2003). Laparoscopic management of adnexal masses in pregnancy: a case series. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 108(2):217–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Thornton JG, Wells M (1987). Ovarian cysts in pregnancy: does ultrasound make traditional management inappropriate? Obstet Gynecol 69(5):717–721

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Giuntoli RL, Vang RS, Bristow RE (2006). Evaluation and management of adnexal masses during pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 49(3):492–505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Reynolds K, Menon U, Jacobs I (2005) Development and identification of tumor markers. In: Hoskins WJ, Perez CA, Young RC (eds) Principles of gynecologic oncology, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1279–1311

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Cenk Sayin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sayin, N.C., Inal, H.A. & Varol, F.G. Pregnancies complicated by adnexal masses: a case series. Arch Gynecol Obstet 278, 573–577 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-008-0622-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-008-0622-7

Keywords

Navigation