Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Lack of prenatal care: an independent risk factor for perinatal mortality among macrosomic newborns

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To examine the association between lack of prenatal care (LOPC) and perinatal complications among parturients carrying macrosomic fetuses.

Study design

The study population consisted of consecutive women with singleton fetuses weighing 4 kg and above, delivered between the years 1988 and 2003. A comparison was performed between parturients lacking prenatal care (fewer than three visits at any prenatal care facility) and those with three and more prenatal care visits. A multiple logistic regression model was constructed in order to investigate the association between LOPC and perinatal mortality.

Results

During the study period, 7,332 women delivered macrosomic newborns in our institute. Of those, 8.0% (n = 590) lacked prenatal care. Patients lacking prenatal care were more likely to be Bedouins, of higher parity and older than the comparison group. Higher rates of perinatal mortality were noted among patients lacking prenatal care (OR = 5.4, 95%CI 2.8–10.5; P < 0.001). Using a multivariable analysis and controlling for macrosomia-related complications, it was found that the association between LOPC and perinatal mortality persisted (OR = 4.1, 95% CI 2.1–8.1; P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Lack of prenatal care is an independent risk factor for perinatal mortality among macrosomic newborns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brundtland GH. Perinatal mortality and morbidity—a global view. Speech, XVIII European congress of perinatal medicine, 19 June 2002

  2. Bank W Millennium development goals. http://www.developmentgoals.org/

  3. Pregnancy is special (1998) Safe mother (25):1

  4. Oral E, Cagdas A, Gezer A, Kaleli S, Aydinli K, Ocer F (2001) Perinatal and maternal outcomes of fetal macrosomia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol 99:167–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boulet SL, Alexander GR, Salihu HM, Pass M (2003) Macrosomic births in the United States: determinants, outcomes and proposed grades or risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:1372–1378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brunskill AJ, Rossing MA, Connell FA, Daling J (1991) Antecedents of macrosomia. Pediatr Perinat Epidemiol 5(4):392–401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Blondel B, Marshall B (1998) Poor antenatal care in 20 French districts: risk factors and pregnancy outcome. J Epidemiol Community Health 52:501–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Petrou S, Kupek E, Vause S, Maresh M (2003) Antenatal visits and adverse perinatal outcomes: results from a British population-based study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol 106:40–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sheiner E, Hallak M, Shoham-Vardi I, Goldstein D, Mazor M, Katz M (2000) Determining risk factors for intrapartum fetal death. J Reprod Med 45:419–424

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Oron T, Sheiner E, Shoham-Vardi I, Mazor M, Katz M, Hallak M (2001) Risk factors for antepartum fetal death. J Reprod Med 46:825–830

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Twizer I, Sheiner E, Hallak M, Mazor M, Katz M, Shoham-Vardi I (2001) Lack of prenatal care in a traditional society. Is it an obstetric hazard? J Reprod Med 46(7):662–668

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Leiberman JR, Fraser D, Weitzman S, Glezerman M (1993) Birth weight curves in southern Israel populations. Isr J Med Sci 29:198–203

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. ACOG Practice Bulletin (2002) Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia, number 33, January 2002. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 77:67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. ACOG Practice Bulletin (2001) Gestational diabetes, number 30, September 2001. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. Obstet Cynecol 98:525–538

    Google Scholar 

  15. Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, McPhee AJ, Jeffries WS, Robinson JS (2005) Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 352:2477–2486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Langer O, Yogev Y, Most O, Xenakis EMJ (2005) Gestational diabetes: the consequences of not treating. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:989–997

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang J, Cummings EA, O’Connell C, Jangaard K (2006) Fetal and neonatal outcomes of diabetic pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 108:644–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mathews TJ, MacDorman MF (2007) Infant mortality statistics from the 2004 linked birth/infant death data set. Natl Vital Stat Rep 55(14):1–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jevitt CM (2005) Shoulder dystocia: etiology, common risk factors, and management. J Midwifery Womens Health 50:485–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wagner RK, Nielsen PE, Gonik B (1999) Shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 26:371–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eyal Sheiner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dickstein, Y., Ohel, I., Levy, A. et al. Lack of prenatal care: an independent risk factor for perinatal mortality among macrosomic newborns. Arch Gynecol Obstet 277, 511–514 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0510-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0510-6

Keywords

Navigation