Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effects of TCu-380A on cervicovaginal flora

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to identify the alterations in cervicovaginal flora after insertion of TCu 380A which is a popular type of copper IUD.

Study design

Among the women who visited the Department of Family Planning in our hospital during 1 month, 100 subjects who preferred IUDs for contraception and who had no history of local or systemic antibiotic use were considered eligible candidates.

Results

Anaerobic colonies, especially Gram-positive cocci and Gram-negative bacilli were isolated at significantly higher rates after the insertion of TCu-380A. Aerobic colonies were isolated relatively less.

Conclusions

It can be suggested that copper IUD causes the predominance of anaerobic species in the cervicovaginal flora, which is consistent with the literature. This clinically insignificant condition can be attributed to the copper content or threads of the IUDs. Yet there is no evidence that the prevalance of pelvic infections is influenced by the use of IUDs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ämmälä M, Nyman T, Strengell L (1995) Effect of intrauterine contraceptive devices on cytokine messenger ribonucleic acid expression in the human endometrium. Fertil Steril 63:773

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chukudebelu WO (1980) Bacteriological study of IUDs removed from Nigerian Igbo. Int J Gynecol Obstet 17:355

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Everett ED, Reller LB, Droegemuller W, Greer BE (1976) Absence of bacteremia after insertion or removal of intrauterine device. Obstet Gynecol 47:207

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Farley MM, Rosenberg MJ, Rowe PJ et al (1998) Low risk of infection from IUD use shown. Contracept Technol Update 19(8):102–103

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grimes DA, Schulz KF (2000) Antibiotic prophylaxis for intrauterine contraceptive device insertion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001327

  6. Haukkama M (1987) Bacterial flora of the cervix in women using an intrauterine device. Contracept 36:527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mohllajee AP, Curtis KM, Petersen HB (2006) Does insertion and use of an intrauterine device increase the risk of pelvic inflammatory disease among women with sexually transmitted infection? A systematic review. Contraception 73(2):145–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Salem RM (2006) New attention to the IUD: expanding women’s contraceptive options to meet their needs. Popul Rep B (7):1–26

  9. Sivin I, Diaz S, Pavez M et al (1991) Two-year comparative trial of the gyne T380 slimline and gyne T380 intrauterine copper device. Contraception 44:481

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sivin I, Stern J (1994) International Committee for Contraception Research. Health during prolonged use of levonorgestrel 20 mg/d and the copper TCu-380A intrauterine contraceptive devices; a multicenter study. Fertil Steril 61:70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tinelli A, Tinelli R, Malvasi A et al (2006) The intrauterine device in modern contraception: still an actuality? Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 11(3):197–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tolcher R (2003) Intrauterine techniques: contentious or consensus opinion? J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 29(1):21–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. United Nations Development Programme/United Nations Population Fund/World Health Organization/World Bank, Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (1997) Long-term reversible contraception. Twelve years of experience with the TCu-380A and TCu-220C. Contraception 56:341

    Google Scholar 

  14. Viberga I, Odlind V (2005) Microbiology profile in women with pelvic inflammatory disease in relation to IUD use. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 13(4):183–190

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wahab SA (1985) Effect of copper intrauterine device on cervicovaginal flora. Int J Gynecol Obstet 23:153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wolf AS (1986) Bacterial colonisation of intrauetrine devices. Arch Gynecol 239:31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mine Kanat-Pektas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kanat-Pektas, M., Ozat, M. & Gungor, T. The effects of TCu-380A on cervicovaginal flora. Arch Gynecol Obstet 277, 429–432 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0496-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0496-0

Keywords

Navigation