Skip to main content
Log in

Persistent subumbilical discharge associated with actinomycosis caused by intrauterine contraceptive device: a case report

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intrauterine devices are a very effective form of contraception used worldwide for more than 2 centuries. One of the serious, but rare, complications of intrauterine contraception is perforation through the uterine wall into the pelvic or abdominal cavity. In this report we describe, persistent periumbilical discharge associated actinomycosis caused by migration of a copper intrauterine contraceptive device. To our knowledge, this is the first report of persistent periumbilical discharge caused by migration of a copper intrauterine contraceptive device. We recommend consideration of this minor possibility during evaluation of women with chronic abdominal discharge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dennis J, Hampton N (2002) IUDs: which device? J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 28:61–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson K, Ryde-Blomqvist E, Lindell K, Odlind V, Milsom I (1998) Perforations with intrauterine devices. Report from a Swedish survey. Contraception 57:251–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ozcelik B, Serin IS, Basbug M, Aygen E, Ekmekcioglu O (2003) Differential diagnosis of intra-uterine device migrating to bladder using radiographic image of calculus formation and review of literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 108:94–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tuncay YA, Tuncay E, Guzin K, Ozturk D, Omurcan C, Yucel N (2004) Transuterine migration as a complication of intrauterine contraceptive devices: six case reports. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 9:194–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Caliskan E, Ozturk N, Dilbaz BO, Dilbaz S (2003) Analysis of risk factors associated with uterine perforation by intrauterine devices. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 8:150–155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Russo TA (2005) Agents of actinomycosis. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R (eds) Principles and practice of infectious diseases, 6th edn. Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, pp 2924–2934

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smith AJ, Hall V, Thakker B, Gemmell CG (2005) Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Actinomyces species with 12 antimicrobial agents. J Antimicrob Chemother 56:407–409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Markovitch O, Klein Z, Gidoni Y, Holzinger M, Beyth Y (2002) Extrauterine mislocated IUD: is surgical removal mandatory? Contraception 66:105–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ozdemir H, Mahmutyazicioğlu K, Tanriverdi HA, Gündoğdu S, Savranlar A, Ozer T (2004) Migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device to the ovary. J Clin Ultrasound 32(2):91–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kemal Gungorduk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Polat, I., Gungorduk, K., Polat, G. et al. Persistent subumbilical discharge associated with actinomycosis caused by intrauterine contraceptive device: a case report. Arch Gynecol Obstet 277, 457–460 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0477-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0477-3

Keywords

Navigation