Skip to main content
Log in

Is there still a role for emergency cerclage in the developed world? An experience from a London district hospital

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Cervical incompetence appears to have a greater prevalence in the developing world, which possibly extends to multi-ethnic communities in the UK. Emergency cerclage has been found to have a relative degree of success in patients detected on ultrasound or presenting clinically. Our study aimed to look at the emergency cerclage outcome in the multi-ethnic population of our district hospital.

Methods

Sixty-two cases of cervical cerclage were reviewed retrospectively from 2000 to 2006 with 16 cases being emergencies. Maternal history, presentation, operation details and outcome were recorded.

Results

Of the 16 emergency cases, 8 were successful (delivery over 24 weeks gestation), 7 failed and 1 had not yet delivered. The failure rate was found to be significantly higher in the black African women (P = 0.04). Diagnosis by ultrasound as opposed to clinical presentation was associated with a better outcome (P = 0.03). The most significant determinant of outcome was the presence of coliforms on presentation, all of which failed (P = 0.007).

Conclusion

In this small sample of patients requiring emergency cerclage, findings are suggestive of a poor outcome in black African women, which may be related to previous obstetric history. Similarly the presence of infection especially coliforms is also associated with poor prognosis, while ultrasound diagnosis of dilating cervix rather than clinical diagnosis had a better outcome. Early screening for infection, use of prophylactic antibiotics and sonographic monitoring are likely to improve the success rate of emergency cervical cerclage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

GA:

Gestational age

LLETZ:

Large loop excision of the transformation zone

TOP:

Termination of pregnancy

References

  1. Althuisius SM, Dekker GA, van Geijn HP, Bekedam DJ, Hummel P (2000) Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial (CIPRACT): study design and preliminary results. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183(4):823–829

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Baxter JK, Airoldi J, Berghella V (2005) Short cervical length after history-indicated cerclage: is a reinforcing cerclage beneficial? Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(3 Pt 2):1204–1207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cardosi RJ, Chez RA (1998) Comparison of elective and empiric cerclage and the role of emergency cerclage. J Matern Fetal Med 7(5):230–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Caruso A, Trivellini C, De Carolis S, Paradisi G, Mancuso S, Ferrazzani S (2000) Emergency cerclage in the presence of protruding membranes: is pregnancy outcome predictable? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 79(4):265–268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Goodlin RC (1979) Cervical incompetence, hourglass membranes and amniocentesis. Obstet Gynecol 53:748–750

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harger JH (1980) Comparison of success and morbidity in cervical cerclage procedures. Obstet Gynecol 56:543–548

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. James H, Harger (2002) Cerclage and cervical insufficiency: an evidence based analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 100(6):1313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Janske M, Aarts Jozien TJ, Brons Hein W, Bruinse (1995) Emergency cerclage: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 50(6):459–469 Review

  9. Latta RA, McKenna B (1996) Emergent cervical cerclage: predictors of success and failure. J Matern Fetal Med 5(1):22–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lidegaard O (1994) Cervial incompetence and cerclage in Denmark 1980–1990 A register based epidemiological survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 73:35–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Novy MJ, Gupta A, Wothe D, Gupta S, Kennedy K, Gravett MG (2000) Cervical cerclage in the second trimester of pregnancy: a historical cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:1447–1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Olatunbosun OA, Nuaim LA, Turnwell RW (1995) Emergency cerclage compared with bed rest for advanced cervical dilatation in pregnancy. Int Surg 80:170–174

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsatsaris V, Senat MV, Gervaise A, Fernandez H (2001) Balloon replacement of fetal membranes to facilitate emergency cervical cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 98(2):243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Turrentine MA, MD, Stewart DJ, MD, Ramirez MM, MD (2007) Use of the cervical cerclage; comparison of a Community and University Hospital Setting. Mark Obstet Gynecol 109:320–325

  15. Scheerer LJ, Lam F, Bartolucci L, Katz M (1989) A new technique for reduction of prolapsed fetal membranes for emergency cervical cerclage. Obstet Gynecol 74:408–410

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ugwumadu A, Manyonda I, Reid F, Hay P (2003) Effect of early oral clindamycin on late miscarriage and preterm delivery in asymptomatic women with abnormal vaginal flora and bacterial vaginosis: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 361(9362):983–988

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Waloch M (1996) Cervical cerclage in the treatment of cervical incompetence in Zambian women. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 23(4):255–262

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our special thanks to Dr Jonathan Joseph for statistical analysis of the results and proof reading of the drafts of the paper. Thanks also to Dr Preeti Bharadwaj for help with development of the proforma for the data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Fakokunde.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steel, A., Yoong, W., Okolo, S. et al. Is there still a role for emergency cerclage in the developed world? An experience from a London district hospital. Arch Gynecol Obstet 277, 139–142 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0422-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0422-5

Keywords

Navigation