Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of two- and three-dimensional ultrasonography in the evaluation of fetal heart: image quality and time spent in the exam

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To compare fetal heart evaluation done through two-dimensional (2DUS) and three-dimensional ultrasonography (3DUS) as to optimal plane imaging, image quality, and time needed to perform the examination.

Methods

Prospective study involving 12 normal pregnant women, with gestational ages ranging from 22 to 26 weeks, scanned with a VOLUSON® 730 with a convex 4.0–7.0 MHz transducer, in both two- and three-dimensional modes. In each case, three basic view planes were obtained: four-chambers view, right, and left ventricular outflow tracts. Each view was subjectively evaluated by three different examiners as to image quality, and graded from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum) cross-marks (+). The sum of all grades obtained for each case was used to classify the quality of the exam as unsatisfactory (0 to 1+), poor (2 to 4+), regular (5 to 7+), and good (8 to 12+). The time taken to obtain the views was recorded for each case, starting with the acquisition of the first view on the 2D exam and with the identification and opening of the volume blocks on the three-dimensional software.

Results

The number of three-dimensional blocks with good, regular, poor, and unsatisfactory grades were, respectively, 6, 15, 9, and 10. The average in cross-marks of the cases graded good in each group without the worst result for each plane was 8. 2DUS was superior to 3DUS regarding the quality of the images obtained by the three pattern view planes and the average time to obtain high quality view planes was longer for 3DUS when compared to 2DUS. 2DUS offered better quality images and in less time than 3DUS.

Conclusions

Three-dimensional ultrasound is an advancement in fetal heart evaluation; however two-dimensional ultrasound remains the best screening method in diagnosing cardiac malformations, due to the good quality of its images and the lesser time needed to perform the exam.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allan L, Benacerraf B, Copel JA, et al (2001) Isolated major congenital heart disease. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 17:370–379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Garne E, Stoll C, Clementi M (2001) Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects by ultrasound: experience from 20 European registries. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 17:386–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tegnander E, Eik-Nes SH, Johansen OJ, Linker DT (1995) Prenatal detection of heart defects at the routine fetal examination at 18 weeks in a non-selected population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 5:372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Copel JA, Gianluigi P, Green J, Hobbins JC, Kleinman CS (1987) Fetal echocardiographic screening for congenital heart disease: the importance of the four-chamber view. Am J Obstet Gynecol 157:648

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Achiron R, Glaser J, Gelernter I, Hegesh J, Yagel S (1992) Extended fetal echocardiographic examination for detecting cardiac malformations in low risk pregnancies. BMJ 304:671

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kirk JS, Riggs TW, Comstorck CH, Lee W, Yang SS, Weinhouse E (1994) Prenatal screening for cardiac anomalies: the value of routine addition of the aortic root to the four-chamber view. Obstet Gynecol 84:427

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Deng J, Sullivan IA, Yates R, et al (2002) Real-time three-dimensional fetal echocardiography optimal imaging windows. Ultrasound Med Biol 28(9):1099–1105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leventhal M, Pretorius DH, Sklansky MS, Budorick NE, Nelson TR, Lou K (1998) Three-dimensional ultrasonography of the normal fetal heart: comparison with two-dimensional imaging. J Ultrasound Med 17:341–348

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chaoui R, Kalache KD, Hartung J (2001) Application of three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 17:22–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sklansky MS, Nelson TR, Pretorius DH (1997) Usefulness of gated three-dimensional fetal echocardiography to reconstruct and display structures not visualized with two-dimensional imaging. Am J Cardiol 80:665

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bega G, Kuhlman K, Lev-Toaff A, Kurtz A, Wapner R (2001) Application of three-dimensional ultrasonography in the evaluation of fetal heart. J Ultrasound Med 20:307–313

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (1994) Guidelines for performance of the antepartum obstetrical ultrasound examination. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, Laurel, MD

  13. Maulik D, Nanda NC, Singh V, Dod H, Vengala S, Sinha A, Sidhu MS, Khanna D, Lysikiewicz A, Sicuranza G, Modh N (2003) Live three-dimensional echocardiography of the human fetus. Echocardiography 20(8):715–721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sklansky MS, Nelson T, Strachan M, Pretorius D (1999) Real-time three-dimensional fetal echocardiography: initial feasibility study. J Ultrasound Med 18(11):745–752

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zosmer N, Jurkovic D, Jauniaux E, Gruboeck K, Lees C, Campbell S (1996) Selection and identification of standard cardiac views from three-dimensional volume scans of the fetal thorax. J Ultrasound Med 15:25

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ECOCLÍNICA, Rua Reinaldo Tavares de Melo, 142/901 Manaíra, CEP 58038-300, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil

    Hélio Antonio Guimarães Filho & Lavoisier Linhares Dias da Costa

  2. Ultrasound Training Center of Sao Paulo (CETRUS), São Paulo, SP, Brazil

    Sebastião Marques Zanforlin Filho & Cláudio Rodrigues Pires

  3. Obstetrics Department of Sao Paulo’s Federal University, Sao Paulo’s School of Medicine (Unifesp/EPM), São Paulo, Brazil

    Hélio Antonio Guimarães Filho, Edward Araujo Júnior, Cláudio Rodrigues Pires, Luciano M. M. Nardozza, Antonio Fernandes Moron & Rosiane Mattar

Authors
  1. Hélio Antonio Guimarães Filho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lavoisier Linhares Dias da Costa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Edward Araujo Júnior
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sebastião Marques Zanforlin Filho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Cláudio Rodrigues Pires
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Luciano M. M. Nardozza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Antonio Fernandes Moron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Rosiane Mattar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hélio Antonio Guimarães Filho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guimarães Filho, H.A., da Costa, L.L.D., Araujo Júnior, E. et al. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional ultrasonography in the evaluation of fetal heart: image quality and time spent in the exam. Arch Gynecol Obstet 276, 231–235 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0350-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0350-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation