Skip to main content
Log in

The significance of uterine notching in Doppler sonography in early pregnancy as a predictor for pathologic outcome of the pregnancy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Doppler sonography of maternal vessels as a predictor for preeclampsia is an established screening method in the second trimester. Considering the first trimester its benefit has not been conclusively proven so far. Up to now the flow pattern of maternal vessels in the first trimester has only been insufficiently characterized and documented. Thus, there are only few pieces of information concerning the predictive value of the different kinds of flow patterns during the early pregnancy as regards the pathological and physiological outcome of the pregnancy. This survey aimed at evaluating the significance and the clinical importance of Doppler sonographical examinations of the Aa. uterinae during early pregnancy. It had to be analyzed whether various perfusions can be applied as a predictive value for the specific development during the pregnancy and whether therefore a risk group for pregnancy-associated hypertension can already be detected during the early pregnancy.

Materials and methods

A non-selected collective of 104 pregnant patients was examined with Doppler sonography and retrospectively divided into a standard collective and a high-risk collective. The standard collective contained 89 patients, who in the course of their pregnancy remained without any pathological findings. Fifteen patients, who were assigned to the high-risk collective, either developed a pregnancy-induced hypertension during their pregnancy or an intrauterine fetal growth retardation. The Doppler-sonographic examination of the Aa. uterinae was applied for the first time between the 6 and 8 weeks gestation (WG), then in the 9 WG, 10 WG, 11 WG, between the 12 and 14 WG, as well as between the 20 and 24 WG.

Results

Contrary to published data, there can be traced a completely transformed flow pattern in the Aa. uterinae already during the first trimester to an increasing extent. This correlates with a positive outcome of the pregnancy. There is a definite association between pathological Doppler sonography in the first third of the pregnancy and the development of a uteroplacental insufficiency as well as a pregnancy-associated hypertension (SIH) in the further course of the pregnancy.

Conclusion

Doppler sonography is an approved method in order to become early attentive of a reduced uterine blood flow. Applying Doppler sonographic treatment of the maternal vessels, uteroplacental insufficiency can be traced at an early stage. Pregnancies, which might develop a pregnancy-associated hypertension (SIH) or a placental insufficiency, can be detected during the early pregnancy to decrease the morbidity rate and the mortality of premature newborns. Further studies in larger collectives are necessary to obtain adequate solid datasets and to further evaluate the clinical meaning and the significance concerning pathological maternal Doppler parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hütter W, Grab D, Schneider D, Terinde R, Wolf A (1994) Continuous-wave Doppler investigation of uteroplacental vessels in high-risk pregnancies as predictor of fetal growth retardation and pregnancy-induced hypertension. Gynecol Obstet Inves 38:90–92

    Google Scholar 

  2. Papageorghiou AT, Yu CK, Cicero S, Bower S, Nicolaides KH (2002) Second-trimester uterine artery Doppler screening in unselected populations: a review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 12:78–88

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Konje JC, Howarth ES, Kaufmann P, Taylor DJ (2003) Longitudinal quantification of uterine artery blood volume flow changes during gestation in pregnancies complicates by intrauterine growth restriction. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 110:301–305

    Google Scholar 

  4. Frusca T, Soregaroli M, Platto C, Enterri L, Lojacono A, Valcamonico A (2003) Uterine artery velocimetry in patients with gestational hypertension. Obstet Gynecol 102:136–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hütter W, Grab D, Ehmann J, Stoz F, Wolf A (1993) Diagnostic value of continuous wave (cw) Doppler sonography in maternal diabetes mellitus. Ultraschall Med 14:169–174

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Grab D, Hütter W, Haller T, Sterzik K, Terinde R (1993) Discordant growth in twin pregnancy—value of Doppler ultrasound. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 53:42–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Papageorghiou AT, Yu CK, Bindra R, Pandis G, Nicolaides KH (2001) Multicenter screening for pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by transvaginal uterine artery Doppler at 23 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:441–449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Parretti E, Mealli F, Magrini A, Cioni R, Mecacci F, La-Torre P, Periti E, Scarselli G, Mello G (2003) Cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluation of uterine artery Doppler velocimetry for the prediction of pre-eclampsia in normotensive women with specific risk factors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22:160–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Coleman MA, Mc Cowan LM, North RA (2000) Mid-trimester uterine artery Doppler screening as a predictor of adverse pregnancy outcome in high-risk woman. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 15:7–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Caforio L, Testa AC, Mastromarino C, Carducci B, Ciampelli M, Mansueto D, Caruso A (1999) Predictive value of uterine artery velocimetry at midgestation in low- and high-risk populations: a new perspective. Fetal Diagn Ther 14:201–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Aardema MW, Saro MC, Lander M, De Wolf BT, Oosterhof H, Aarnoudse JG (2004) Second trimester Doppler ultrasound screening of the uterine arteries differentiates between subsequent normal and poor outcomes of hypertensive pregnancy: two different pathophysiological entities? Clin Sci (Lond) 106:377–382

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Martin AM, Bindra R, Curcio S, Cicero S, Nicolaides KH (2001) Screening for pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by uterine artery Doppler at 11–14 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:583–586

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Harrington K, Goldfrad C, Carpenter RG, Campell S (1997) Transvaginal uterine and umbilical artery Doppler examination of 12–16 weeks and the subsequent development of pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 9:94–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schuchter K, Metzenbauer M, Hafner E, Phillip K (2001) Uterine artery Doppler and placental volume in the first trimester in the prediction of pregnancy complications. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:590–592

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Funk A, Fendel H, Jorn H (1991) Transvaginal Doppler ultrasonographic patterns of total uterine perfusion in the development of utero-placental insufficiency with pre-eclampsia. Z Geburtsh Perinatol 195:267–271

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wirtz I (2002) Transvaginale Dopplersonographie der Arteria uterina und Arteria umbilicalis im 1. und 2. Trimenon. Dissertation RWTH Aachen

  17. Irion O, Masse J, Forest JC, Moutquin JM (1996) Peak systolic over protodiastolic ratio as an objective substitute for the uterine artery notch. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103:993–998

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Becker R, Vonk R, Vollert W, Entezami M (2002) Doppler sonography of uterine arteries at 20–23 weeks: risk assessment of adverse pregnancy outcome by quantification of impedance and notch. Journal of Prenatal Medicine 5:200–209

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hollis B, Mavrides E, Campbell S, Tekay A, Thilaganathan B (2001) Reproducibility and repeatability of transabdominal uterine artery Doppler velocimetry between 10 and 14 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:593–597

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Albaiges G, Missfelder-Lobos H, Parra M, Lees C, Cooper D, Nicolaides KH (2003) Comparison of color Doppler uterine artery indices in a population at high risk for adverse outcome at 24 weeks´ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21:170–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Prefumo F, Sebire NJ, Thilaganathan B (2004) Decreased endovascular trophoblast invasion in first trimestre pregnancies with high-resistance uterine artery Doppler indices. Hum Reprod 19:206–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Voigt HJ, Becker V (1992) Doppler flow measurements and histomorphology of the placental bed in utero-placental insufficiency. J Perinat Med 20:139–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Carbillon L, Largilliere C, Perrot N, Tigaizin A, Cynober E, Uzan M (2003) Uteroplacental haemodynamics and uterine artery Doppler practice at 12 weeks gestation. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 31:378–381

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vainio M, Kujansuu E, Koivisto AM, Menpaa J (2005) Bilateral notching of uterine arteries at 12–14 weeks of gestation for prediction of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 84:1062–1067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Carbillon L, Largilliere C, Perrot N, Tigaizin A, Paries J, Pharizien I, Uzan M (2004) Prospective evaluation of uterine artery flow velocity waveforms at 12–14 and 22–24 weeks of gestation in relation to pregnancy outcome and birth weight. Fetal Diagn Ther 19:381–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ismini Staboulidou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Staboulidou, I., Soergel, P., Schippert, C. et al. The significance of uterine notching in Doppler sonography in early pregnancy as a predictor for pathologic outcome of the pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 276, 21–28 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-006-0290-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-006-0290-4

Keywords

Navigation