Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The efficacy of 2002 CDC guidelines in preventing perinatal group B Streptococcal vertical transmission: a prospective study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of the current study is to evaluate the differences in the rate of perinatal group B streptococcal vertical transmission between women who correctly underwent the CDC 2002 guidelines and women who did not.

Methods

Two study groups: women who correctly underwent the CDC 2002 guidelines (study group 1) and women who did not (study group 2). Intrapartum chemoprophylaxis (IC) was administered to all pregnant women identified as GBS carrier. All newborns received, in the first hour of life, a culture based screening for GBS colonization.

Results

One thousand six hundred and sixty nine women were enrolled in the study. The 2002 CDC guidelines were correctly applied in 1273 (76.3%) subjects. There was no early-onset GBS disease. No statistically significant difference in the total number of colonized newborns between study group 1 (4.1%) and study group 2 (3.3%) was found. When the analysis was limited to women with positive GBS screening, a significant difference (P < 0.001) was observed in the number of colonized newborns between mothers who received IC during at least 4 h (group 1; 3.7%) and those who received an IC during less than 4 h (group 1; 12.3%).

Conclusion

The accurate application of the 2002 CDC guidelines is strongly supported but, to furthermore reduce the risk for GBS colonization and sepsis in the newborns, it appears desirable to identify additional and new prevention strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AAP:

American Academy of Pediatrics

ACOG:

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

CDC:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

EOGBS:

Early-onset group B Streptococcus disease

g:

Gram

GBS:

Group B Streptococcus

IC:

Intrapartum chemoprophylaxis

mg:

Milligram

ml:

Milliliter

n:

Number

μg:

Microgram

References

  1. Eickoff TC, Klein JO, Daly AK, Ingall D, Finland M (1964) Neonatal sepsis and other infections due to group B beta-hemolytic streptococci. N Engl J Med 271:1221–1228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schrag SJ, Zell ER, Lynfield R et al (2002) A population-based comparison of strategies to prevent early-onset group B streptococcal disease in neonates. N Engl J Med 347:233–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Davies H, LeBlanc J, Bortolussi R, McGeer A (1999) The pediatric investigators collaborative network on infections in Canada (PICNIC) study of neonatal group B streptococcal infections in Canada. Pediatr Child Health 4:257–263

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Davies HD, Raj S, Adair C, Robinson J, McGeer A (2001) Population-based active surveillance for neonatal group B streptococcal infections in Alberta, Canada: implications for vaccine formulation. Pediatr Infect Dis J 20:879–884

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schuchat A (1998) Epidemiology of group B streptococcal disease in tha United States: shifting paradigm. Clin Microbiol Rev 11:497–513

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schuchat A (1999) Group B streptococcus. Lancet 353:51–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schrag SJ, Zywicki S, Farley MM, Reingold AL, Harrison LH, Lefkowitz LB et al (2000) Group B streptococcal disease in the era of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. N Engl J Med 342:15–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. American Academy of Pediatrics (1997) Revised guidelines for prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal (GBS) infection. Pediatrics 99:489–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hall RT, Barnes W, Krishan L, Harris DJ, Rhodes PG, Fayez J, et al (1976) Antibiotic treatment of parturient women colonized with group B streptococci. Am J Obstet Gynecol 124:630–634

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gardner SE, Yow MD, Leeds LJ, Thompson PK, Mason EO Jr, Clark DJ (1979) Failure of penicillin to eradicate group B streptococcal colonization in the pregnant women: a couple study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 135:1062–1065

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Committee on Obstetric Practice (1996) American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal disease in newborns: ACOG Committee Opinion No. 173. Washington, ACOG

  12. Schrag SJ, Zell ER, Lynfield R, Roome A, Arnold KE, Craig AS, Harrison LH, Reingold A, Stefonek K, Smith G, Gamble M, Schuchat A (2002) A population-based comparison of strategies to prevent early-onset group B streptococcal disease in neonates. N Engl J Med 347:233–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease (2002) Revised guidelines from CDC. MMWR Recomm Rep 51(RR-11):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  14. Prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal disease in newborns (2002) ACOG Committee Opinion No. 279. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 100:1405–1412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gilbert GL, Hewitt MC, Turner CM, Leeder SR (2002) Epidemiology and predictive values of risk factor for neonatal group B streptococcal sepsis. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 42:497–503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sweet RL, Gibbs RS (2002) Group B Streptococci. In: Sweet RL, Gibb RS (eds) Infectious diseases of the female genital tract, 4th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 31–46

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nemunaitis-Keller J, Gill P (2003) Limititations of the obstetric group B Streptococcus protocol. J Reprod Med 48(2):107–111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chandran L, Navaie-Waliser M, Zulqarni NJ, Batra S, Bayir H, Shah M, Lincoln PP (2001) Compliance with group B streptococcal disease prevention guidelines. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 26(6):313–319

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Simoes JA, Aroutcheva AA, Heimler I, Faro S (2004) Antibiotic resistance patterns of group B streptococcal clinical isolates. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 12:1–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rouse DJ, Andrews WW, Lin FC et al (1998) Antibiotic susceptibility profile of GBS acquired vertically. Obstet Gynecol 92:931–934

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Betriu C, Gomez M, Sanchez A et al (1994) Antibiotic resistance and penicillin tolerance in clinical isolates of GBS. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 38:2183–2186

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu JW, Wu JJ, Ko WC, Chuang YC (1997) Clinical characteristics and antimicrobial susceptibility of invasive GBS infection in non pregnant adults in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc 96:628–633

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Levine EM, Ghai V, Barton JJ, Strom CM (1999) Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis increases the incidence of Gram-negative neonatal sepsis. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 7:210–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mercier BM, Carr TL, Beazley DD, Crouse DT, Sibai BM (1999) Antibiotic use in pregnancy and drug-resistant infant sepsis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:816–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. The International Collaborative Study of Severe Anaphylaxis (2003) Risk of anaphylaxis in a hospital population in relation to the use of various drugs: an international study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 12:195–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Neugut AI, Ghatak AT, Miller RL (2001) Anaphylaxis in the United States: an investigation into its epidemiology. Arch Intern Med 161:15–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dunn AB, Blomquist J, Khouzami V (1999) Anaphylaxis in labor secondary to prophylaxis against group B Streptococcus. A case report. J Reprod Med 44:381–384

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Miller EL (2002) The penicillins: a review and update. J Midwifery Womens Health 47:426–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Davies HD, Miller MA, Faro S, Gregson D, Kehl SC, Jordan JA (2004) Multicenter study of a rapid molecular-based assay for the diagnosis of group B Streptococcus colonization in pregnant women. Clin Infect Dis 39:1129–1135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sinha A, Lieu TA, Paoletti LC, Weinstein MC, Platt R (2005) The projected health benefits of maternal group B streptococcal vaccination in the era of chemoprophylaxis. Vaccine 23:3187–3195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Davide Lijoi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lijoi, D., Capua, E.D., Ferrero, S. et al. The efficacy of 2002 CDC guidelines in preventing perinatal group B Streptococcal vertical transmission: a prospective study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 275, 373–379 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-006-0263-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-006-0263-7

Keywords

Navigation