Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 275, Issue 4, pp 241–244 | Cite as

Female sterilization by tubal ligation: a re-appraisal of factors influencing decision making in a tropical setting

Original Article

Abstract

Background

Female sterilization by tubal ligation is the most commonly used method of fertility regulation. However, in some lesser-developed country like Nigeria, it has not been accepted as a popular method of contraception.

Objective

To assess the pattern of female sterilization and determine factors that may influence its acceptability.

Method

A retrospective study of 102 cases of tubal ligation (TL) performed between January 1999 and December 2004.

Result

Of the 102 patients/clients, 60 (58.8%) had TL at caesarean section, 28 (27.5%) had TL with repair of ruptured uterus and 14 (13.7%) clients had TL alone on request. In the reproductive age group, the rate of TL increased with age. In the group that had TL at caesarean section, the highest incidence of TL (65%) was recorded against parity 4. However, in the groups that had TL with repair of ruptured uterus and TL alone, the highest proportion of TL was recorded against parity 6, with rates of 46.3 and 57.1%, respectively. The rates of TL increased with the level of literacy. In the group that had TL alone, 92.9% of the clients were in a monogamous union. On the contrary, 89.3% of patients that had TL with repair of uterine rupture were in a polygamous union. There was relative distribution of patients/clients amongst the two religions and five ethnic grouping. In 55 of the 102 patients/clients, the indication for TL was completion of family size, though 41 of the 55 patients had TL at caesarean section.

Conclusion

Demand for TL alone was low. A greater percentage of the patients had TL in conjunction with another surgical procedure.

Keywords

Tubal ligation Acceptability Pomeroy’s method 

References

  1. 1.
    Arends-Keunning M (2002) Reconsidering the doorstep delivery system in the Bangladesh family Planning Program. Stud Fam Plann 23:87–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Revel A, Abrahamov Y, Yagel S, Nadjari M (2004) Utero-ovarian morphology and blood flow after tubal ligation by the Pomeroy technique. Contraception 69:151–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bachrach CA, Mosher WD (1984) Use of contraception in the United States Hyattsvile (MD): national center for health statistics: (vital and health statistics; advance data no. 102)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Church CA, Geller JS (1990) Voluntary female sterilization: number one and growing. Popul Rep C 10:1–32Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ezegwu HU, Nwogu-Ikogo EE (2004) Sterilization at caesarean section in Nigeria. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 87:157–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lawson JB (1988) Rupture of the uterus. In: Lawson JB, Stewart DB (eds) Obstetrics and gynaecology in the tropics and developing countries. Edward Arnold, London, pp 203–210Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mitchel MJ, Thistle P (2004) Acceptability of levonorgestrel subdermal implants versus tubal ligataion for long term contraception in a rural population of Zimbabawe. Contraception 70:483–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nantu S (1986) Female sterilization—experience in a Nigeria center. J Obstet Gynaeco 6(4):262–264Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    United Nations (1992) Level and trends of contraceptive use as assessed in 1988. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    World Health Organization Task Force on female sterilization (1982) Special programme of research development and research training in human reproduction. Minilaparotomy of laparoscopy for sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 143:645–652Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics & GynaecologyAhmadu Bello University Teaching HospitalShika-ZariaNigeria
  2. 2.KadunaNigeria

Personalised recommendations