Abstract
Objective
To prospectively assess the effect of water birth on maternal and fetal outcomes in a selected low-risk collective of a tertiary obstetrical unit.
Method
In this prospective observational study, 513 patients of a low-risk collective, who requested a water birth, were studied during the years 1998–2002. Primary outcome measurements included the maternal and fetal parameters. Secondary outcome measurements comprised data on the incidence of water births in an interested, low-risk population in an academic hospital.
Result
All groups were similar in terms of demographic and obstetric data. Significant differences were observed in maternal outcome parameters, which included the use of analgesia/anesthesia during labor, the duration of first and second stages of labor, perineal tears and episiotomy rate. No differences were seen in all observed fetal outcome parameters including APGAR scores, arterial and venous pH, admission rate to neonatal intensive care unit and infection rate.
Conclusion
Water birth is a valuable and promising alternative to traditional delivery methods. The maternal and fetal outcomes were similar to traditional land births. However, currently there still exist some deficits in the scientific evaluation of its safety. Therefore, the selection of a low-risk collective is essential to minimize the risks with the addition of strictly maintained guidelines and continuous intrapartum observation and fetal monitoring. Based on our results and the literature, water births are justifiable when certain criteria are met and risk factors are excluded.
References
Embry M (1805) Observations sur un accouchement termine dans le bain. Ann Soc Med Pract Montp 53:185–191
Odent M (1983) Birth under water. Lancet 24:1476–1477
House of Commons Health Committee (1992) Maternity service: second report (Winterton report). Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London
Dudenhausen JW, Eldering G, Grauel EL, Groneck P, Huch R, Husslein P, Moll W, Pohlandt F, Schneider KTM, Zimmerman R (2004) Stellungsnahme zur Wassergeburt. Leitlinien, Empfehlungen, Stellungsnahmen der deutschen Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, September 2004
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Births in water. Available: http://www.rcog.org.uk/medical/birth.html
Woodward J, Kelly SM (2004) A pilot study for a randomized controlled trial of water birth versus land birth. BJOG 111:537–545
Geissbuehler V, Stein S, Eberhard J (2004) Waterbirths compared with landbirths: an observational study of nine years. J Perinat Med 32:308–314
Bodner K, Bodner-Adler B, Wierrani F, Mayerhofer K, Fousek C, Niedermayr A, Grunberger W (2002) Effects of water birth on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Wien Klin Wochenschr 114:391–395
Otigbah CM, Dhanjal MK, Harmsworth G, Chard T (2000) A retrospective comparison of water births and conventional vaginal deliveries. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 91:15–20
Clinical effectiveness support unit (2001) The use of electronic fetal monitoring. The use of cardiotocography in intrapartum fetal surveillance. Evidence-based clinical guideline number 8. RCOG Press, London
Schorn M, McAlister J, Blanco J (1993) Water immersion and the effect on labor. J Nurse Midwifery 38:336–342
Aird IA, Luckas MJ, Buckett WM, Bousfield P (1997) Effects of intrapartum hydrotherapy on labour related parameters. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 37:137–142
Zimmermann R, Huch A, Huch R (1993) Water birth—is it safe? J Perinat Med 21:5–11
Mc Candlish R, Renfrew M (1993) Immersion in water during labour and birth: the need for evaluation. Birth 20:79–85
Rawal J, Shah A, Stirk F, Mehtar S (1994) Water birth and infection in babies. BMJ 309:511
Nguyen S, Kuschel C, Teele R, Spooner C (2002) Water birth: a near drowning experience. Pediatrics 110:411–413
Bowden K, Kessler D, Pinette M, Wilson E (2003) Underwater birth: missing the evidence or missing the point? Pediatrics 112:972–973
Cluett ER, Nikoderm VC, McCandlish RE, Burns EE (2004) Immersion in water in pregnancy, labour and birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, issue 1, art. no. CD000111.pub2. DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD000111.pub2
Pinette MG, Wax J, Wilson E (2004) The risks of water birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:1211–1215
Schröcksnadel H, Kunczicky V, Meier J, Brezinka C, Oberaigner W (2003) Gebären im Wasser—Erfahrungen einer Universitätsklinik und eines Bezirkskrankenhauses in Österreich. Gyn Geburtsh Rundsch 43:7–11
Woodward J, Kelly SM (2004) A pilot study for a randomized controlled trial of water birth versus land birth. BJOG 111:537–545
Geissbühler V, Eberhard J (2003) Erfahrunge mit der Unterwassergeburt. Eine prospektive longitudinale Studie über 9 Jahre mit fast 4000 Wassergeburten. Gyn Geburtsh Rundsch 43:12–18
Ohlsson G, Buchhave P, Leandersson U, Nordstrom L, Rydhstrom H, Sjolin I (2001) Warm tub bathing during labour: maternal and neonatal effects. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:311–314
Rush J, Burlock S, Lambert K, Loosley Millman M, Hutchison B, Enkin M (1996) The effects of whirlpool baths in labor: a randomized controlled trial. Birth 23:136–143
Eckert K, Turnbull D, MacLennan A (2001) Immersion in water in the first stage of labour: a randomized controlled trial. Birth 28:84–93
Cammu H, Clasen K, Van Wetteren L, Derde M (1994) To bathe or not to bathe during first stage of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 73:468–472
Cammu H, Clasen K, Van Wetteren L (1992) Is having a warm bath during labour useful? J Perinat Med 20:104
Geissbuehler V, Eberhard J (2000) Waterbirths: a comparative study. A prospective study on more than 2000 waterbirths. Fetal Diagn Ther 15:291–300
Barry CN (1995) Water births: could saline in the pool reduce the potential hazards? BMJ 310:1602
Rawal J, Shah A, Stirk A, Mehtar S (1994) Water birth and infection in babies. BMJ 309:511
Acknowledgment
The science fund of the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, provided financial support. There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zanetti-Dällenbach, R., Lapaire, O., Maertens, A. et al. Water birth, more than a trendy alternative: a prospective, observational study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 274, 355–365 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-006-0208-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-006-0208-1