Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A cost utility analysis of the right method for screening hemoglobin E among Thai pregnant women

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Inherited hemoglobin disorders are an important problem in many developing countries including Thailand. Of the several inherited hemoglobin disorders, hemoglobin E (HbE) (beta 26, GAG-AAG, Glu-Lys) is the most common hemoglobinopathy in Thailand. Presently, screening to identify carriers of hemoglobin disorders among pregnant subjects is an interesting topic in antenatal care in Thailand. Of late, many trials have been conducted to identify the right screening methods for the detection of hemoglobin disorders among Thai pregnant women. The common screening methods include red blood cell (RBC) index determination, application of mathematical model and hemoglobin electrophoresis. Methods: Here, the author presents an evaluation of the cost utility of those tests in medical practice in Thailand. The cost/utility of hemoglobin electrophoresis is the highest followed by RBC index determination, application of mathematical model and DCIP test. Results: Here, it can be shown that the cost per accurate diagnosis for DCIP is the least expensive. Conclusion: It is interesting to note that DCIP also posed high sensitivity in the screening for HbE disorder. Therefore, this test is the best method for screening the population, particularly pregnant women, to identify carriers of hemoglobin disorders. It should be recommended as part of antenatal care in Thailand as well as its neighbouring countries which have a similar high rate of HbE disorder.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Flatz G, Pik C, Sringam S (1965) Hemoglobin E and Thalassemia—their distribution in Thailand. Ann Hum Genet 29:151–170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wasi P, Na-Nakron S, Suingdumrong A (1967) Study of distribution of hemoglobin E, Thalassemias and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency in north-eastern Thailand. Nature 214:501–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fucharoen S, Winichagoon P (1997) Hemoglobinopathies in Southeast Asia: molecular biology and clinical medicine. Hemoglobin 21:299–319

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wasi P, Pootrakul S, Pravatmaung P, Winichagoon P, Fucharoen S (1980) Thalassemia in Thailand. Ann N Y Acad Sci 344:352–363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Paritpokee N, Suwansaksri J, Wiwanitkit V, Siritantikorn A (1999) Screening tests for inherited hemoglobin disorders in pregnancies: results from King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. Chula Med J 43:645–653

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wiwanitkit V, Suwansaksri J, Paritpokee N, Siritantikorn A (2000) Screening test for hemoglobin disorders in Thai pregnant subjects. Presented at 41st annual scientific meeting, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, pp 20–24

  7. Kaewboworn U (1985) Discriminant function between IDA and Thal-triat. R Thai Army Med J 6:397

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kulapongs P, Tawarat S, Sanguansermsri T (1978) Dichlorophenolindophenol (DCIP) precipitation test: a simple screening test for hemoglobin E and alpha thalassemia (Thalassemia conference in memory of Dr. Sanga Pootrakul at the Mahidol University, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital February 10–11, 1977). J Med Assoc Thai 61:62–63

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clarke GM, Higgins TN (2000) Laboratory investigation of hemoglobinopathies and thalassemias: review and update. Clin Chem 46(8 Pt 2):1284–1290

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Suwansaksri J, Wiwanitkit V, Paritpokee N (2004) Screening for hemoglobin disorders in Thai pregnant women by England and Frazer’s calculation method. Arch Gynecol Obstet 270:211–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wiwanitkit V, Suwansaksri J, Paritpokee N, Siritantikorn A (1999) Comparison between hemoglobinopathy disorders detection by screening test and hemoglobin typing. Thai J Hematol Transfus Med 10:37–40

    Google Scholar 

  12. Panich V, Pornpatkul M, Sriroongrueng W (1992) The problem of thalassemia in Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 23(Suppl 2):1–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Paritpokee N, Wiwanitkit V, Suwansaksri J (2002) Hemoglobin electrophoresis in Thai non-anemic pregnant subjects, a need for additional screening for hemoglobin E. Clin Chem Lab Med 40:1176–1177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Soogarun S, Sirimongkolsakul S, Mahakittikul B, Wiwanitkit V, Pradniwat P, Palasuwan A (2004) Comparison of the KKU-DCIP diagnostic kit to the standard hemoglobin electrophoresis method for detection of hemoglobin E carriers. Lab Hematol 10:189–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 10330, Bangkok, Thailand

    Viroj Wiwanitkit

Authors
  1. Viroj Wiwanitkit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viroj Wiwanitkit.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wiwanitkit, V. A cost utility analysis of the right method for screening hemoglobin E among Thai pregnant women. Arch Gynecol Obstet 274, 88–90 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-006-0134-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-006-0134-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation