Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prelabor rupture of membranes at term in low-risk women: induce or wait?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To compare the outcomes of expectant versus induction of labor management of patients presenting with prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) at term. Study design: Observational case–control study over a period of 36 months. Setting: King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Subjects: All obstetric patients with no obstetric risk factors, other than PROMs at term, were included in our study. Each patient was matched with a control case, whose labor started with intact membranes. Outcome measures: Length of labor duration, fetal distress, intrapartum pyrexia, rate of cesarean delivery, and Apgar scores at birth. Results: The length of labor duration was shorter in patients with PROMs at term compared to the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Furthermore, cesarean section (CS) rate was 4.5% in the PROMs group versus 5.5% in the control group. Among patients with PROM who received induction of labor management, the rates of intrapartum pyrexia and CS were almost twice than in patients who were managed expectantly. However, the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: In the absence of other obstetric and maternal or fetal risk factors, PROMs at term does not seem to constitute additional obstetric risks. Furthermore, expectant management of PROM at term enhances the patient’s chance of normal vaginal delivery without an increase in fetal and/or maternal morbidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. British Medical Journal (1979) Premature rupture of the membranes. Br Med J 1165–1166

  2. Lanier LR, Scarbrough RW, Fillingim DW et al (1965) Incidence of maternal and fetal complications associated with rupture of the membranes before onset of labour. J Obstet Gynecol 93:398

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marshall VA (1993) Management of premature rupture of membranes at or near term. J Nurse Midwifery 38(3):140–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tamsen L, Lyrenas S, Enattingius S et al (1990) Premature rupture of the membranes intervention or not. Gynecol Obstet Invest 29(2):128–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Russel KP, Anderson GW (1962) The aggressive management of ruptured membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 83:930–934

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Duff P, Huff RW, Gibbs RS (1984) Management of premature rupture of membranes and unfavorable cervix in terms of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 63:697

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wagner MV, Chin VP, Peters CJ et al (1989) A comparison of early and delay induction of labour with spontaneous rupture of membranes at term. Obstet Gynecol 74:93

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kappy KA, Centralo C, Knuppel RA et al (1982) Premature rupture of membranes at term A comparison of induced and spontaneous labour. Reprod Med 27:29

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Evaldson G, Lagrelius A, Winiarski J (1980) Premature rupture of the membranes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 59:385

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Egan D, Oherlihy C (1988) Expectant management of spontaneous rupture of membranes at term. J Obstet Gynecol 243–247

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bishop EH (1964) Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol 24:266–268

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Seitchik J, Castillo M (1982) Oxytocin augmentation of dysfunctional labor. Clinical data Am J Obstet Gynecol 144:899

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Grant J, Keirse MJ (1989) Prelabor rupture of membranes at term. In: Chalmers I, Enkin M (eds) Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 1112

    Google Scholar 

  14. Minkoff H, Grunebamm A, Schawrz R et al (1983) Risk factors for prematurity and premature rupture of membranes: a prospective study of the vaginal flora in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 150:965

    Google Scholar 

  15. Richard L, Naeye et al (1982) Factors that predispose to rupture of the fetal Membranes. Obstet Gynecol 60:93

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cammu H, Verlaenen H, Derde MP et al (1990) Premature rupture of membranes at term in nulliparous women: a hazard. Obstet Gynecol 76(4):671–674

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Norman H, Daikoku D, Frank K et al (1981) Premature rupture of membranes and preterm labor: neonatal infection and perinatal mortality risks. Obstet Gynecol 58:417

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Alcalay M, Hourvitz A, Reichman B (1996) Prelabor rupture of membranes at term: early induction of labor versus expectant management. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 70(2):129–133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hannah ME, Ohlsson A, Farine D et al (1996) Induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of membranes at term. N Engl J Med 334:1005–1010

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shalev E, Peleg D, Eliyahu S, Nahum Z (1995) Comparison of 12- and 72-hour expectant management of premature rupture of membranes in term pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 85:766–768

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gafani A, Goeree R et al (1997) Induction of labor versus expectant management for prelabor rupture of membranes at term: an economic evaluation. Can Med Assoc J (11)1519–1525

  22. Flenady V, King J, Review Group (2002) Cochrane pregnancy and childbirth group. Antibiotics for prelabor rupture of membranes at or near term. Cochrane Database System Rev AN:CD001807

  23. Centers for disease control and prevention (2002) Prevention of perinatal group B Streptococcal disease: revised guidelines from CDC. MMWR 51:RR-11:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  24. Seaward PG, Hannah ME, Myhr TL, Farine D, Ohlsson A, Wang EE et al (1997) International multicenter term prelabor rupture of membranes study: evaluation of predictors of clinical chorioamnionitis and postpartum fever in patients with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177:1024–1029

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Monga M, Oshiro BT (1993) Puerperal infections. Semin Perinatol 17:426–431

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shutte MF, Treffers, Kloosterman GJ et al (1983) Management of premature rupture of membranes: the risk of vaginal examination to the infant. Am J Obstet Gynecol 146:395

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80215, 21589, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

    Tarik Y. Yamani Zamzami

Authors
  1. Tarik Y. Yamani Zamzami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tarik Y. Yamani Zamzami.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zamzami, T.Y.Y. Prelabor rupture of membranes at term in low-risk women: induce or wait?. Arch Gynecol Obstet 273, 278–282 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-005-0072-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-005-0072-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation