Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

, Volume 273, Issue 4, pp 236–238 | Cite as

Water birth: is the water an additional reservoir for group B streptococcus?

  • R. Zanetti-Dällenbach
  • O. Lapaire
  • A. Maertens
  • R. Frei
  • W. Holzgreve
  • I. Hösli
Original Article

Abstract

Objective: Water birth became popular in the last years, despite the fact that many questions like the risk of infection for the newborn remain unanswered. Group B streptococcal (GBS) infections in the newborn remain a challenge in obstetrics and neonatology. Method: We conducted a prospective trial to study the impact of water birth on the colonization rate of the bath water and, more importantly, the GBS-colonization rate of the newborn. Result: After water birth the bath water was significantly more often colonized with GBS than after immersion followed by a delivery in bed. The newborns, however, showed no difference in GBS colonization and there was even a trend towards less GBS colonization of the newborn after a water delivery. Conclusion: Regarding GBS colonization of the newborn during water birth there might be a wash out effect, which protects the children during the delivery.

Keywords

Immersion Water delivery Group B streptococcus 

References

  1. 1.
    Alderdice F, Renfrew M, Garcia J, McCandlish R (1993) Labour and birth in water. Lancet 342:1563CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alderdice F, Renfrew M, Marchant S, Ashurst H, Hughes P, Gerridge G, Garcia J (1995) Labour and birth in water in England and Wales. BMJ 310:837PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bowden K, Kessler D, Pinette M, Wilson E (2003) Underwater birth: missing the evidence or missing the point? Pediatrics 112(4):972–973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brocklehurst P, Garcia J, Lumley J (1996) Birthing pools and infection control. Lancet 348:275CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cluett E, Pickering R, Getliffe K, Saunders N (2004) Randomized controlled trial of labouring in water compared with standard of augmentation for management of dystocia in first stage of labour. BMJ. DOI 10.1136/bmj.37963.606412EEGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Geissbühler V, Stein S, Eberhard J (2004) Waterbirths compared with landbirths: an observational study of nine years. J Perinat Med 32:308–314CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gilbert R, Tookey P (1999) Perinatal mortality and morbidity among babies delivered in water: surveillance study and postal survey. BMJ 319:483–487PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johnson P (1996) Birth under water—to breathe or not to breathe. BJOG 103:202–208MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Odent M (1983) Birth under water. Lancet 24/31:1476–1477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Otigbah C, Dhanjal M, Harmsworth G, Chard T (2000) A retrospective comparison of water births and conventional vaginal deliveries. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 91:15–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ridgway GL, Tedder RS (1996) Birthing pools and infection control. BMJ 347:1051–1052Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roome A, Spencer R (1996) Birthing pools and infection control. Lancet 348:274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schuchat A (2000) Neonatal group B streptococcal disease—screening and prevention. NEJM 343:209–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Woodward J, Kelly S (2004) A pilot study for a randomized controlled trial of waterbirth versus land birth. BJOG 111:537–545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Zanetti-Dällenbach
    • 1
  • O. Lapaire
    • 1
  • A. Maertens
    • 1
  • R. Frei
    • 2
  • W. Holzgreve
    • 1
  • I. Hösli
    • 1
  1. 1.University Women’s Hospital BaselBaselSwitzerland
  2. 2.Bacteriology LaboratoryUniversity HospitalsBaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations