Abstract
During the 4-year routing study of smears in 2,919 pregnant women, 33 cases of abnormalities of the uterine cervix were detected (1.13%). The patients were followed with uterine cervical cytology and colposcopy, and in case of need, sometimes punch biopsies were performed. As a result of the cytologies, 33 cases with abnormalities were detected. There were 26 cases classified as class IIIa and 7 cases were class IIIb. All cases underwent colposcopy. For the 17 cases that showed lesions by colposcopy, punch biopsies were performed. The results of histologic examination were wide: 5 chronic cervicitis, 1 condyloma, 1 mild dysplasia, 3 moderate dysplasia, 3 severe dysplasia, 3 carcinoma in situ, and 1 microinvasive carcinoma. Only two cases were treated during pregnancy, condyloma underwent Laser vaporization and microinvasive carcinoma underwent Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) conization. Other cases were conservative treatment during pregnancy. Excluding one case for persistence smear class IIIa of histology condyloma, all the other cases with regression of dysplasia and carcinoma in situ with treatment after delivery. We conclude that lesions up to carcinoma in situ do not require intervention during pregnancy but microinvasive carcinoma is suspected, diagnostic LEEP conization is necessary, even during pregnancy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bosch, FX, Manos MM, Munoz N, Sherman M, Jansen AM, Peto J, Shiffman MH, Moreno V, Kurman R, Shah KV (1995) Prevalence of human papillomavirus in cervical cancer: a worldwide perspective. J Natl Cancer Inst 87: 796–802
Boutselis JG (1972) Intraepithelial carcinoma of the cervix associated with pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 40: 657–666
Fife KH, Katz BP, Roush J, Handy VD, Brown DR, Hansell R (1996) Cancer-associated human papillomavirus types are selectively increased in the cervix of women in the first trimester of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174: 1487–1493
Baggish MS (1986) A comparison between laser excisional caanization and laser vaporization for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 155: 39–44
Sadler L, Saftlas A, Wang W, Exeter M, Whittaker J, McCowan L (2004) Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery. JAMA 291: 2100–2106
Demeter A, Sziller I, Csapo Z, Szantho A, Papp Z (2002) Outcome of pregnancies after cold-knife conization of the uterine cervix during pregnancy. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 23: 207–210
El-Bastawissi AY, Becker TM, Daling JR (1999) Effect of cervical carcinoma in situ and its management on pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 93: 207–212
van Rooijen M, Person E (1999) Pregnancy outcome after laser vaporization of the cervix. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 78: 346–348
Avrette HE, Nasser N, Yankow SL, Little WA (1970) Cervical conization in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 15: 543–549
Hacker NF, Berek JS, Lagasse LD, Charles EH, Savage EW, Moore JG (1982) Carcinoma of the cervix associated with pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 59: 735–746
de Brux J, Brechet M (1979) Epithelial displasias of the uterine cervix during pregnancy and its evolution. Bull Cancer 66: 147–53
Taleiban F, Krumholz BA, Shayan A, Mann LI (1976) Colposcopic evaluation of patients with abnormal cytologic smears during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 47: 693–696
Connor JP (1998) Noninvasive cervical cancer complicating pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 25: 331–342
Economos K, Perez Veridiiano N, Delke I, Collado ML, Tancer ML (1993) Abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 81: 915–918
Kaufman RH, Adam E (1999) Is human papillomavirus testing of value in clinical practice? Am J Obstet Gynecol 180: 1049–1053
Palle C, Bangsboll S, Andreasson B (2000) Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol 79: 306–310
Mitchel MF, Tortolero-Luna G, Cook E, Whittaker L, Rhodes-Morris H, Silva E (1998) A randomized clinical trial of cryotherapy, laser vaporization, and loop electrosurgical excision for treatment of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 92: 737–744
Stoler MH, Schiffman M, Atypical Squamous Cells of Undermined Significance-Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study (ATLS) Group (2001) Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations: realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study. JAMA 285: 1500–1505
Wright TC Jr, Cox JT, Massad LS, Twiggs LB, Wilkinson EJ (2002) 2001 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities. JAMA 287: 2120–2129
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yamazaki, T., Inaba, F., Takeda, N. et al. A study of abnormal cervical cytology in pregnant women. Arch Gynecol Obstet 273, 355–359 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-005-0063-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-005-0063-5