Skip to main content
Log in

Third degree perineal tears in a university medical center where midline episiotomies are not performed

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Midline episiotomy is a known major risk factor for severe perineal lacerations. The study was aimed to define obstetric risk factors for third-degree perineal tears in a university medical center where midline episiotomies are not performed.

Study design

A comparison between vaginal deliveries complicated with third-degree perineal tears and deliveries without third-degree perineal tears was performed. Deliveries occurred between the years 1988–1999 in a tertiary medical center. Multiple gestations, preterm deliveries (<37 weeks’ gestation), cesarean deliveries and cases of shoulder dystocia were excluded from the analysis. A multiple logistic regression model was constructed in order to find independent risk factors for third-degree perineal tears. Odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated from the regression coefficient.

Results

During the study period, 79 (0.1%) consecutive cases of third degree perineal tears were identified. Significant risk factors from the univariate analysis were fetal macrosomia (OR 2.7, 95%CI 1.2–5.5), nulliparity (OR 2.9, 95%CI 1.8–4.6), labor induction (OR 1.9, 95%CI 1.0–3.5), failure of labor to progress during the second stage (OR 10.8, 95%CI 5.4–21.1), non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns (OR 11.7, 95%CI 6.1–21.5), mediolateral episiotomy (OR 2.8, 95%CI 1.8–4.5), vacuum extraction (OR 10.6, 95%CI 6.1–18.3), and forceps delivery (OR 29.2, 95%CI 7.3–97.2). However, using a multivariable analysis, only fetal macrosomia (OR 2.5, 95%CI 1.2–4.9), vacuum extraction (OR 8.2, 95%CI 4.7–14.5), and forceps delivery (OR 26.7, 95%CI 8.0–88.5) remained as independent risk factors. The combined risk for instrumental deliveries of macrosomic newborns was 8.6 (95% CI 1.2–62.5; p=0.010).

Conclusions

After adjustment for possible confounding variables, mediolateral episiotomy per se was not an independent risk factor for third-degree perineal tears. Instrumental vaginal deliveries of macrosomic fetuses should be avoided whenever possible to decrease the occurrence of third-degree perineal tears.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Angioli R, Gomez-Marin O, Cantuaria G, O’Sullivan MJ (2000) Severe perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery: the University of Miami experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1083–1085

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bek KM, Laurberg S (1992) Intervention during labor: risk factors associated with complete tear of the anal sphincter. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 71:520–524

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bodner-Adler B, Bodner K, Kaider A, Wagenbichler P, Leodolter S, Husslein P, Mayerhofer K (2001) Risk factors for third-degree perineal tears in vaginal delivery, with an analysis of episiotomy type. J Reprod Med 46:752–756

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Christianson LM, Bovbjerg VE, McDavitt EC, Hullfish KL (2003) Risk factors for perineal injury during delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:255–260

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carroll TG, Engelken M, Mosier MC, Nazir N (2003) Epidural analgesia and severe perineal laceration in a community-based obstetric practice. J Am Board Fam Pract 16:1–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Davey DA, MacGillivray I (1988) The classification and definition of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 158:892–898

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Feinstein U, Sheiner E, Levy A, Hallak M, Mazor M (2002) Risk factors for arrest of descent during the second stage of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 77:7–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Klein MC, Gauthier RJ, Robbins JM et al (1994) Relationship of episiotomy to perineal trauma and morbidity, sexual dysfunction, and pelvic floor relaxation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:591–597

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Leiberman JR, Fraser D, Weitzman S, Glezerman M (1993) Birth weight curves in southern Israel populations. Isr J Med Sci 29:198–203

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJ, Dekker GA et al (1997) Third-degree obstetric perineal tears: risk factors and the prevention role of mediolateral episiotomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:563–566

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Riskin-Mashiah S, O’Brian Smith E, Wilkins IA (2002) Risk factors for severe perineal tear: can we do better? Am J Perinatol 19:225–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shiono P, Klebanoff MA, Carey JC (1990) Midline episiotomies: more harm than good? Obstet Gynecol 75:765–770

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Thacker SB (2000) Midline versus mediolateral episiotomy. BMJ 320:1615–1616

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Walsh CJ, Mooney EF, Upton GJ et al (1996) Incidence of third-degree perineal tears in labour and outcome after primary repair. Br J Surg 83:218–221

    Google Scholar 

  15. White P (1978) Classification of obstetric diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 130:228–230

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wooley RJ (1995) Benefits and risks of episiotomy: a review of the English literature since 1980. Parts I and II. Obstet Gynecol Surv 50:806–835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eyal Sheiner.

Additional information

Presented in part at the Society for Gynecologic Investigation 50th Annual Scientific Meeting, Washington, DC, 27–30 March 2003

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sheiner, E., Levy, A., Walfisch, A. et al. Third degree perineal tears in a university medical center where midline episiotomies are not performed. Arch Gynecol Obstet 271, 307–310 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-004-0610-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-004-0610-5

Keywords

Navigation