Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A study of the incidence and recognition of surgical glove perforation during obstetric and gynecological procedures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to compare the frequency of surgical glove perforation among obstetric and gynecological surgical procedures, and to evaluate surgeons' perceptions.

Materials and methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in which nursing personnel examined the gloves used in obstetric and gynecological procedures, immediately after the surgery, in order to detect perforations.

Results

Surgical glove perforation occurred in 20.8% of 817 obstetrics procedures and 24.4% of 131 gynecology procedures. The observed difference between groups was not statistically significant (p=0.35). Obstetricians perceived the occurrence of perforation in 30.6% of the events, and gynecologists in 37.5%. This difference was not statistically significant (p=0.44).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arena B, Maffulli N, Vocaturo I, Scognamiglio G (1991) Incidence of glove perforation during caesarean section. Ann Chir Gynaecol 80(4):377–380

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bennett B, Duff P (1991) The effect of double gloving on frequency of glove perforations. Obstet Gynecol 78:1019–1021

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohn GM, Seifer DB (1990) Blood exposure in single versus double gloving during pelvic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162:715–717

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Doyle PM, Alvi S, Johanson R (1992) The effectiveness of double- gloving in obstetrics and gynaecology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 99:83–84

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferreiro RB, Sepkowitz KA (2001) Management of needlestick injuries. Clin Obst Gynecol 44(2):276–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Serrano WC, Wright JW, Newton ER (1991) Surgical glove perforation in Obstetrics. Obstet Gynecol 77:4525–4528

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shelley C, Patrick D (1993) Frequency of glove perforations and subsequent blood contact in association with surgical procedures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168(5):1354–1357

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Welch J, Webster M, Tilzey AJ, Noah ND, Banatvala JE (1989) Hepatitis B infection after gynaecological surgery. Lancet 8631:205–207

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandre Faisal-Cury.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Faisal-Cury, A., Rossi Menezes, P., Kahhale, S. et al. A study of the incidence and recognition of surgical glove perforation during obstetric and gynecological procedures. Arch Gynecol Obstet 270, 263–264 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-003-0552-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-003-0552-3

Keywords

Navigation