Abstract
Objectives
The purpose of this study was to compare the frequency of surgical glove perforation among obstetric and gynecological surgical procedures, and to evaluate surgeons' perceptions.
Materials and methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted in which nursing personnel examined the gloves used in obstetric and gynecological procedures, immediately after the surgery, in order to detect perforations.
Results
Surgical glove perforation occurred in 20.8% of 817 obstetrics procedures and 24.4% of 131 gynecology procedures. The observed difference between groups was not statistically significant (p=0.35). Obstetricians perceived the occurrence of perforation in 30.6% of the events, and gynecologists in 37.5%. This difference was not statistically significant (p=0.44).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arena B, Maffulli N, Vocaturo I, Scognamiglio G (1991) Incidence of glove perforation during caesarean section. Ann Chir Gynaecol 80(4):377–380
Bennett B, Duff P (1991) The effect of double gloving on frequency of glove perforations. Obstet Gynecol 78:1019–1021
Cohn GM, Seifer DB (1990) Blood exposure in single versus double gloving during pelvic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162:715–717
Doyle PM, Alvi S, Johanson R (1992) The effectiveness of double- gloving in obstetrics and gynaecology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 99:83–84
Ferreiro RB, Sepkowitz KA (2001) Management of needlestick injuries. Clin Obst Gynecol 44(2):276–288
Serrano WC, Wright JW, Newton ER (1991) Surgical glove perforation in Obstetrics. Obstet Gynecol 77:4525–4528
Shelley C, Patrick D (1993) Frequency of glove perforations and subsequent blood contact in association with surgical procedures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168(5):1354–1357
Welch J, Webster M, Tilzey AJ, Noah ND, Banatvala JE (1989) Hepatitis B infection after gynaecological surgery. Lancet 8631:205–207
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Faisal-Cury, A., Rossi Menezes, P., Kahhale, S. et al. A study of the incidence and recognition of surgical glove perforation during obstetric and gynecological procedures. Arch Gynecol Obstet 270, 263–264 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-003-0552-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-003-0552-3