Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Analysis Of The Prevalence Of Oral Manifestations Between Pemphigus Vulgaris And Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid: Scoping Review

  • REVIEW
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Arduino PG, Broccoletti R, Carbone M et al (2019) Long-term evaluation of pemphigus vulgaris: A retrospective consideration of 98 patients treated in an oral medicine unit in north-west Italy. J Oral pathol med: official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology 48(5):406–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.12847

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ariwasa EAL, Almeida JD, Carvalho YR et al (2008) Clinicopathological analysis of oral mucous autoimmune disease: A 27-year study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 13(2):E94–E97

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carmo MAV, Gleber-Netto FO, Romano MLF et al (2014) Clinical and demographic overlaps among immunologically mediated oral diseases: a challenge for clinicians. Gen Dent 62(1):67–72

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sultan AS, Villa A, Saavedra AP et al (2017) Oral mucous membrane pemphigoid and pemphigus vulgaris- a retrospective two-center cohort study. Oral Dis 23(4):498–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.12639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W et al (2018) PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med 169(7):467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

1. NFM. Contribution: Design of the study; writing of the introduction, of the results and of the discussion. Effective scientific and intellectual participation for the study; preparation and draft of the manuscript; illustrations; tables; organization of the references; critical review and final approval. 2. RTNS. Contribution: Design of the study; preparation and draft of the manuscript; Writing of the results and of the discussion; tables; organization of the references; critical review and final approval; effective scientific and intellectual participation for the study. 3. LGSDJ. Contribution: Design of the study; Writing of the discussion; tables; effective scientific and intellectual participation for the study. 4. ABFA. Contribution: Writing of the discussion and of the conclusion; tables; effective scientific and intellectual participation for the study. 5. AJAV. Contribution: Writing of the results and of the discussion; tables; effective scientific and intellectual participation for the study. 6. APVS. Contribution: Guiding professor; design of the study; Critical review and final approval; effective scientific and intellectual participation for the study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathalya Fedechen Martins.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martins, N.F., dos Santos, R.T.N., Azevêdo, A.B.F. et al. Comparative Analysis Of The Prevalence Of Oral Manifestations Between Pemphigus Vulgaris And Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid: Scoping Review. Arch Dermatol Res 316, 166 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-024-02925-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-024-02925-1

Keywords

Navigation