Abstract
As an increasing number of women pursue careers in dermatology, the structure and culture of training must reflect the evolving needs of dermatology residents. To examine perceived barriers to and perceptions of family planning amongst dermatology residents capable of becoming pregnant, evidence-based principles were employed to develop a 40-question survey for dermatology residents in ACGME-accredited training programs. A pilot study was conducted with the Harvard Combined Dermatology Residency Training Program residents before full-scale national electronic survey distribution from April to June 2023. Information was collected regarding factors influencing attitudes towards becoming pregnant during residency, as well as information regarding residency program family leave, fertility preservation, and lactation policies. Ultimately, 95 dermatology residents capable of becoming pregnant completed the survey. The majority (77.9%) of respondents reported intentionally delaying having children because of their careers, and 73.7% believed there is a negative stigma attached to being pregnant or having children during dermatology residency. Of respondents who had not yet attempted to become pregnant, 75.3% were concerned about the possibility of future infertility. Of the 60% of respondents considering fertility preservation options, 84.6% noted concerns about these procedures being cost-prohibitive on a resident salary. Only 2% of respondents reported that cryopreservation was fully covered through their residency benefits, while 20% reported partial coverage. Reported program parental leave policies varied considerably with 54.9%, 25.4%, 1.4%, and 18.3% of residents reporting 4–6 weeks, 7–8 weeks, 9–10 weeks, and 11 + weeks of available leave, respectively. Notably, 53.5% of respondents reported that vacation or sick days must be used for parental leave. Respondents reported lactation policies and on-site childcare at 49.5% and 8.4% of residency programs, respectively. The trends noted in the survey responses signal concerning aspects of family planning and fertility for dermatology residents capable of becoming pregnant. Residency family planning policies, benefits, and resources should evolve and homogenize across programs to fully support trainees.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Adesoye T, Mangurian C, Choo EK et al (2017) Perceived discrimination experienced by Physician Mothers and Desired Workplace changes: a cross-sectional survey. JAMA Intern Med 177(7):1033–1036. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1394
Anspach Will E, Maslow BS, Kaye L, Nulsen J (2017) Increasing awareness of age-related fertility and elective fertility preservation among medical students and house staff: a pre- and post-intervention analysis. Fertil Steril 107(5):1200–1205e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.008
Ashrafzadeh S, Peters GA, Buzney EA, Lee H, Asgari MM (2021) Gender differences in dermatologist practice locations in the United States: a cross-sectional analysis of current gender gaps. Int J Women’s Dermatology 7(4):435–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijwd.2021.04.003
Association of American Medical Colleges Matriculating Student Questionnaire 2022 All Schools Summary Report. Published online December 2022. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/students-residents/report/matriculating-student-questionnaire-msq
Bae G, Qiu M, Reese E, Nambudiri V, Huang S (2016) Changes in sex and ethnic diversity in Dermatology residents over multiple decades. JAMA Dermatol 152(1):92. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.4441
Costello CM, Harvey JA, Besch-Stokes JG et al (2022) The role research gap years play in a successful dermatology match. Int J Dermatology 61(2):226–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.15964
Effective July 2021: New Family Leave Policy. Accessed July 8 (2023) https://www.abderm.org/public/announcements/effective-july-2021-new-family-leave-policy
Gracey LE, Cronin M, Shinkai K, Mathes EF (2018) Program Director and Resident perspectives on new parent leave in Dermatology Residency. JAMA Dermatol 154(10):1222. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.2878
Halley MC, Rustagi AS, Torres JS et al (2018) Physician mothers’ experience of workplace discrimination: a qualitative analysis. BMJ 363:k4926. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k4926
Kawwass JF, Penzias AS, Adashi EY (2021) Fertility—a human right worthy of mandated insurance coverage: the evolution, limitations, and future of access to care. Fertil Steril 115(1):29–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.09.155
Kenyon LE, Malik R, Rodriguez D, Carmel ME (2021) Urology Program directors’ perception of pregnancy during Residency. Urology 153:75–80
MacVane CZ, Fix ML, Strout TD, Zimmerman KD, Block RB, Hein CL, Congratulations (2017) You’re pregnant! Now about your shifts. : the state of Maternity leave attitudes and culture in EM. West J Emerg Med 18(5):800–810
Mattessich S, Shea K, Whitaker-Worth D (2017) Parenting and female dermatologists’ perceptions of work-life balance. Int J Women’s Dermatology 3(3):127–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijwd.2017.04.001
RESOLVE: The National Infertility Association. Insurance Coverage by State. Accessed July 23 (2023) https://resolve.org/learn/financial-resources-for-family-building/insurance-coverage/insurance-coverage-by-state/
Rickards G, Magee C, Artino AR (2012) You can’t fix by analysis what you’ve spoiled by design: developing Survey instruments and Collecting Validity evidence. J Graduate Med Educ 4(4):407–410. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-12-00239.1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Humphrey and Bray developed the study concept and design. Humphrey and Wyant were responsible for acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data. Humphrey and Wyant drafted the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Humphrey, V.S., Wyant, W.A. & Brag, K.O. Family planning influences and perceptions among dermatology residents from ACGME-accredited training programs: a survey-based study. Arch Dermatol Res 316, 159 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-024-02882-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-024-02882-9