Skip to main content
Log in

Quality of patient-reported outcome measures for grading acne scars and dark marks: a COSMIN review

  • RESEARCH LETTER
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Layton AM, Eady EA, Thiboutot DM, Tan J, Group ACORNAOI (2017) Identifying what to measure in acne clinical trials first steps towards development of a core outcome set. J Invest Dermatol 137(8):1784–1786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2017.04.017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM et al (2018) COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res 27(5):1147–1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Klassen AF, Lipner S, O’Malley M et al (2019) Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate treatments for acne and acne scarring: the ACNE-Q. Br J Dermatol 181(6):1207–1215. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Layton A, Dréno B, Finlay AY et al (2016) New patient-oriented tools for assessing atrophic acne scarring. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 6(2):219–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-016-0098-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tan J, Beissert S, Cook-Bolden F et al (2022) Impact of facial atrophic acne scars on quality of life: a multi-country population-based survey. Am J Clin Dermatol 23:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This article has no funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RU, AS, JK, and JB developed the main conceptual ideas and outline. RU, AS, SL, CK, and JB developed the search criteria. AS, SL, and RU screened articles for inclusion criteria. RU, JC, and JBcollected data and contributed to the analysis of results. RU and JB completed the COSMIN analysis, devised the tables, and wrote the manuscript. All authors approved the final submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John S. Barbieri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

John S. Barbieri has received consulting fees from Dexcel Pharma for work unrelated to the current submission. The authors have no other conflicts to declare.

IRB approval status

Not applicable.

Patient consent

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Prior presentation: The data in this manuscript is original and is not under consideration elsewhere.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 52 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Urbonas, R., Shields, A., Ly, S. et al. Quality of patient-reported outcome measures for grading acne scars and dark marks: a COSMIN review. Arch Dermatol Res 316, 70 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-024-02815-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-024-02815-6

Keywords

Navigation