Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mohs surgeon workforce survey: a spectrum of clinical, academic, and leadership activities

  • SHORT REPORT
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Workforce adequacy for Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is not fully understood. The purpose of this study was to describe the current spectrum of clinical, academic, advocacy and leadership activities through a survey of members of the American College of Mohs Surgery (ACMS). The ACMS membership was electronically sent a 43-question anonymous survey between January and May 2023 and there was a 10.7% response rate representing 184 members across 37 states. Nearly 90% are board certified in micrographic dermatologic surgery and 10.3% indicate that they practice in a rural setting (57.1% suburban and 32.6% urban). The median number of half-day surgeons performed Mohs surgery is 6 and nearly half of Mohs surgeons work in a dermatology-only medical group (48.4%), do no use immunohistochemical stains (60.3%), and do not participate in a multidisciplinary tumor board (58.7%). Many respondents indicate they have capacity in their clinical schedules to accommodate more cases and the reasons are multifactorial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Data availability

The participants of this study did not give written consent for their data to be shared publicly. As a result, supporting data is not available. Please contact the corresponding author with any questions.

References

  1. Tierney EP, Hanke CW (2009) Cost effectiveness of Mohs micrographic surgery: review of the literature. J Drugs Dermatol 8(10):914–922 (PMID: 19852120)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Udkoff J, Beal BT, Brodland DG, Knackstedt T (2022) Cost effectiveness of intermediate-risk squamous cell carcinoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery compared with wide local excision. J Am Acad Dermatol 86(2):303–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2021.07.059. (PMID: 34363906)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Feng H, Belkin D, Geronemus RG (2019) Geographic distribution of U.S. Mohs micrographic surgery workforce. Dermatol Surg 45(1):160–163. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000001506. (PMID: 29620564)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gronbeck C, Kodumudi V, Brodell RT, Grant-Kels JM, Mostow EN, Feng H (2023) Dermatology workforce in the United States - part I: overview, transformations, and implications. J Am Acad Dermatol 89(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2022.06.1191. (PMID: 35787408)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by JFS, CL, JWA, and SHY. The first draft of the manuscript was written by SHY and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sherry H. Yu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scott, J.F., Lam, C., Ahn, J.W. et al. Mohs surgeon workforce survey: a spectrum of clinical, academic, and leadership activities. Arch Dermatol Res 316, 30 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-023-02763-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-023-02763-7

Keywords

Navigation