Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A randomized, open-label study to compare two different dosing regimens of oral tranexamic acid in treatment of moderate to severe facial melasma

  • SHORT REPORT
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Oral tranexamic acid (TXA) demonstrates promising results in melasma management. However, no clear consensus on the dosing and duration of maintenance doses of TXA therapy in melasma exists. In this study, we intend to evaluate and compare the efficacy of two different TXA dosing regimens in patients with melasma using the mMASI score. This was a randomized, open-label study wherein 50 patients (age > 18 years) with moderate to severe melasma were randomized into group A (250 mg TXA twice a day) and group B (500 mg TXA twice a day). Treatment was administered for 12 weeks and later followed up 4-weekly for next 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was proportion of patients achieving 75% reduction in modified Melasma area and severity index (mMASI-75) at 12 weeks from baseline, reduction in mMASI and melasma quality of life (MelasQOL) score at 12 and 24 weeks. To assess the rate of relapse by end of 12 weeks post-treatment. Among 50 patients, proportion of patients achieving mMASI-75 at 12 weeks were 20% and 25% in group A and B, respectively (p-0.71). Both groups showed a significant reduction in mean mMASI (4.8 ± 2.2 in group A and 6.8 ± 3.4 in group B; p-0.02) at 12 weeks of treatment. mMASI remained stable after 12 weeks of follow-up and was 4.9 ± 2.43 and 4.93 ± 2.85 in group A and B, respectively (p-0.97). The mean percentage reduction in MelasQOL in group A and B were 41.8 ± 15.3 and 29.5 ± 21.5, respectively (p-0.03). No adverse effects were observed in both groups. Relapse rates was very less and comparable between both groups. Thus, we conclude that both dosing regimens showed comparable efficacy in terms of mMASI reduction at 12-weeks and the improvement achieved was well maintained even after 12-weeks of discontinuing treatment with very few patients relapsed. Hence, lower doses of TXA are equally effective and safe compared to higher doses and not all patients might require tapering or dosing maintenance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Availability of data and material

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Zhu Y, Zeng X, Ying J, Cai Y, Qiu Y, Xiang W (2022) Evaluating the quality of life among melasma patients using the MELASQoL scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 17(1):e0262833

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu Y, Wu S, Wu H, Liang X, Guo D, Zhuo F (2021) Comparison of the efficacy of melasma treatments: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Med (Lausanne) 8:713554

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bala HR, Lee S, Wong C, Pandya AG, Rodrigues M (2018) Oral tranexamic acid for the treatment of melasma: a review. Dermatol Surg 44(6):814–825

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang JV, Jhawar N, Saedi N (2019) Tranexamic acid for melasma: evaluating the various formulations. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 12(8):E73–E74

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Taraz M, Niknam S, Ehsani AH (2017) Tranexamic acid in treatment of melasma: a comprehensive review of clinical studies. Dermatol Ther. 30(3):e12465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Leminen H, Hurskainen R (2012) Tranexamic acid for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding: efficacy and safety. Int J Womens Health 4:413–421

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Pandya AG, Hynan LS, Bhore R, Riley FC, Guevara IL, Grimes P et al (2011) Reliability assessment and validation of the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) and a new modified MASI scoring method. J Am Acad Dermatol 64(1):78–83 (e1–2)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rodrigues M, Ayala-Cortés AS, Rodríguez-Arámbula A, Hynan LS, Pandya AG (2016) Interpretability of the Modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI). JAMA Dermatol 152(9):1051–1052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Balkrishnan R, McMichael AJ, Camacho FT, Saltzberg F, Housman TS, Grummer S et al (2003) Development and validation of a health-related quality of life instrument for women with melasma. Br J Dermatol 149(3):572–577

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maeda K, Naganuma M (1998) Topical trans-4-aminomethylcyclohexanecarboxylic acid prevents ultraviolet radiation-induced pigmentation. J Photochem Photobiol B 47(2–3):136–141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nagaraju D, Bhattacharjee R, Vinay K, Saikia UN, Parsad D, Kumaran MS (2018) Efficacy of oral tranexemic acid in refractory melasma: a clinico-immuno-histopathological study. Dermatol Ther 31(5):e12704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Del Rosario E, Florez-Pollack S, Zapata L Jr, Hernandez K, Tovar-Garza A, Rodrigues M et al (2018) Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of oral tranexamic acid in the treatment of moderate-to-severe melasma. J Am Acad Dermatol 78(2):363–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lajevardi V, Ghayoumi A, Abedini R, Hosseini H, Goodarzi A, Akbari Z et al (2017) Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy and safety of combined oral tranexamic acid and topical hydroquinone 4% treatment vs. topical hydroquinone 4% alone in melasma: a parallel-group, assessor- and analyst-blinded, randomized controlled trial with a short-term follow-up. J Cosmet Dermatol. 16(2):235–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chowdhary B, Mahajan VK, Mehta KS, Chauhan PS, Sharma V, Sharma A et al (2021) Therapeutic efficacy and safety of oral tranexamic acid 250 mg once a day versus 500 mg twice a day: a comparative study. Arch Dermatol Res 313(2):109–117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Feng X, Su H, Xie J (2021) Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in the treatment of adult melasma: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Pharm Ther 46(5):1263–1273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: MSK, DP, KV, AB; methodology: MSK, RB, KV, AB, DP, VT, VH, AK; formal analysis and investigation: RB, VT, VH, AK; writing—original draft preparation: RB, VH, VT writing—review and editing: MSK, AB, KV, VH, VT, DP; supervision: MSK, KV, AB.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muthu Sendhil Kumaran.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Institutional ethical committee approval

Yes.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhattacharjee, R., Hanumanthu, V., Thakur, V. et al. A randomized, open-label study to compare two different dosing regimens of oral tranexamic acid in treatment of moderate to severe facial melasma. Arch Dermatol Res 315, 1831–1836 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-023-02549-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-023-02549-x

Keywords

Navigation