Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of comprehensiveness of Medicare Part B provider-level data sets within dermatology

  • SHORT REPORT
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Publicly available provider-level Medicare Part B data sets have been increasingly utilized for health services research in dermatology. Despite offering detailed insights, an important limitation of these data sets is suppression of services performed for < 11 Medicare beneficiaries at the level of each provider. This longitudinal review assesses the magnitude of this limitation by comparing service counts in provider-level Medicare data sets to those in aggregate data sets, ultimately identifying a concordance rate of 94.3% for dermatology services. However, facility-based visits (52.5%), inpatient evaluation and management visits (59.7%), phototherapy (62.9%), incision and drainage (61.1%), and nail procedures (38.0%) were less well-represented in the provider-level data sets. Provider-level data sets are most suitable for assessing dermatology services in aggregate and among specific high-volume procedure groups but alternative data sets should be considered when investigating inpatient services, facility-based services (more common in certain states), or rarely performed procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services database at https://data.cms.gov.

References

  1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare physician and other practitioners—by provider and service. https://data.cms.gov/provider-summary-by-type-of-service/medicare-physician-other-practitioners/medicare-physician-other-practitioners-by-provider-and-service. Accessed 13 Nov 2022

  2. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Physician/supplier procedure summary. https://data.cms.gov/summary-statistics-on-use-and-payments/physiciansupplier-procedure-summary. Accessed 13 Nov 2022

  3. Cheraghlou S, Cohen JM (2020) Early adoption of dupilumab in the Medicare population in 2017. Yale J Biol Med 93(5):675–677

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheraghlou S, Watsky KL, Cohen JM (2021) Utilization, cost, and provider trends in patch testing among Medicare beneficiaries in the United States from 2012 to 2017. J Am Acad Dermatol 85(5):1218–1226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2020.04.163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang Y, Lipner SR (2021) Retrospective analysis of nail biopsies performed using the Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Database 2012 to 2017. Dermatol Ther 34(3):e14928. https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.14928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamid RN, McGregor SP, Siegel DM, Feldman SR (2019) Assessment of provider utilization through skin biopsy rates. Dermatol Surg 45(8):1035–1041. https://doi.org/10.1097/dss.0000000000001763

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gronbeck C, Feng PW, Feng H (2020) Economic assessment of the 2020 site-neutral payment reform for dermatologists. J Am Acad Dermatol 83(4):1196–1198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2020.02.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study concept and design: HF. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: CG. Drafting of the manuscript: CG, HF. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: CG, HF. Statistical analysis: CG. Administrative, technical, or material support: CG, HF. Study supervision: HF.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hao Feng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None relevant to this manuscript. Christian Gronbeck: none reported. Hao Feng: Consultant, Cytrellis Biosystems, Inc; Consultant, Soliton, Inc. The authors declare no competing interests.

IRB approval status

This study utilized publicly available online datasets and did not qualify as human subject research; therefore, institutional review board approval was not required at the University of Connecticut Health Center.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gronbeck, C., Feng, H. Assessment of comprehensiveness of Medicare Part B provider-level data sets within dermatology. Arch Dermatol Res 315, 1805–1807 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-023-02530-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-023-02530-8

Keywords

Navigation