Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficacy of a triamcinolone acetonide-loaded dissolving microneedle patch for the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled split-scar study

  • Study Protocol
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The treatment of hypertrophic scars (HTSs) and keloids remains a challenge. Intralesional triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) is the mainstay treatment for these conditions. Despite its efficacy, TAC has several adverse side effects, including telangiectasias, skin atrophy, pigmentary changes, and skin necrosis. Dissolving microneedles (DMN) use the poke-and-release method to create microchannels that enhance drug delivery to the target tissue in the dermis, without causing pain and with a decreased risk of transmission of blood-borne diseases. To evaluate and compare the efficacy of a TAC-DMN versus a drug-free DMN patch for the treatment of HTSs and keloids, 20 patients (10 with HTSs and 10 with keloids) received a split-scar treatment: one half of the scar length was treated with TAC-DMNs and the other half was treated with drug-free DMN for three sessions at 14-day intervals. Efficacy was assessed by measuring the scar volume through a multispectral imaging system and using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). The HTSs treated with TAC-DMNs showed a significant reduction in the mean scar volume 2 weeks after the second treatment and 1 month after the third treatment (p = 0.028 and 0.020, respectively), while the HTSs treated with drug-free DMNs showed no significant reduction in the scar volume. Both sides of the keloids showed no significant reduction in mean scar volume. Using the POSAS, significant improvement in the appearance of both halves of the HTSs was observed 1 month after the treatments. A significant improvement (evaluated by POSAS) was also observed in the keloids treated with TAC-DMNs 2 weeks after the second treatment and 1 month after the third treatment. No significant improvement was observed from the patients’ perspective as evaluated by POSAS in the keloids treated with drug-free DMNs. However, no significant difference was observed between the treatment and control halves. TAC-DMN is an effective treatment for HTSs. Increasing the dosage and duration of keloid scar treatment is required in future studies to determine whether it would result in a significant therapeutic outcome. This trial is registered in the Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR20220318004; date of registration, March 17, 2022).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Raw data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Ogawa R (2022) The most current algorithms for the treatment and prevention of hypertrophic scars and keloids: a 2020 update of the algorithms published 10 years ago. Plast Reconstr Surg 149:79e–94e. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000008667

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang C, Akaishi S, Hyakusoku H, Ogawa R (2014) Are keloid and hypertrophic scar different forms of the same disorder? A fibroproliferative skin disorder hypothesis based on keloid findings. Int Wound J 11:517–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01118.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Berman B, Maderal A, Raphael B (2017) Keloids and hypertrophic scars: pathophysiology, classification, and treatment. Dermatol Surg 43:S3–S18. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000819

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu WS, Wang FS, Yang KD, Huang CC, Kuo YR (2006) Dexamethasone induction of keloid regression through effective suppression of VEGF expression and keloid fibroblast proliferation. J Invest Dermatol 126:1264–1271. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jid.5700274

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Morelli Coppola M, Salzillo R, Segreto F, Persichetti P (2018) Triamcinolone acetonide intralesional injection for the treatment of keloid scars: patient selection and perspectives. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 11:387–396. https://doi.org/10.2147/ccid.s133672

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Muneuchi G, Suzuki S, Onodera M, Ito O, Hata Y, Igawa HH (2006) Long-term outcome of intralesional injection of triamcinolone acetonide for the treatment of keloid scars in Asian patients. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 40:111–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/02844310500430003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Henry S, McAllister DV, Allen MG, Prausnitz MR (1998) Microfabricated microneedles: a novel approach to transdermal drug delivery. J Pharm Sci 87:922–925. https://doi.org/10.1021/js980042+

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Donnelly RF, Raj Singh TR, Woolfson AD (2010) Microneedle-based drug delivery systems: microfabrication, drug delivery, and safety. Drug Deliv 17:187–207. https://doi.org/10.3109/10717541003667798

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ita K (2017) Dissolving microneedles for transdermal drug delivery: advances and challenges. Biomed Pharmacother 93:1116–1127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2017.07.019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yan Q, Cheng Z, Liu H et al (2018) Enhancement of Ag85B DNA vaccine immunogenicity against tuberculosis by dissolving microneedles in mice. Vaccine 36:4471–4476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.06.025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kang G, Kim S, Yang H et al (2019) Combinatorial application of dissolving microneedle patch and cream for improvement of skin wrinkles, dermal density, elasticity, and hydration. J Cosmet Dermatol 18:1083–1091. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yeo DC, Balmayor ER, Schantz JT, Xu C (2017) Microneedle physical contact as a therapeutic for abnormal scars. Eur J Med Res 22:28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-017-0269-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA et al (2004) The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:1960–1965. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000122207.28773.56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Prausnitz MR (2004) Microneedles for transdermal drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 56:581–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2003.10.023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bhatnagar S, Dave K, Venuganti VVK (2017) Microneedles in the clinic. J Control Release 260:164–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.05.029

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim YC, Park JH, Prausnitz MR (2012) Microneedles for drug and vaccine delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 64:1547–1568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.04.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Juhasz MLW, Cohen JL (2020) Microneedling for the treatment of scars: an update for clinicians. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 13:997–1003. https://doi.org/10.2147/ccid.s267192

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. McCrudden MT, McAlister E, Courtenay AJ, González-Vázquez P, Singh TR, Donnelly RF (2015) Microneedle applications in improving skin appearance. Exp Dermatol 24:561–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/exd.12723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yadav PR, Munni MN, Campbell L et al (2021) Translation of polymeric microneedles for treatment of human diseases: recent trends, progress, and challenges. Pharmaceutics 13:1132. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13081132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang D, Salem AK (2012) Optimized dextran-polyethylenimine conjugates are efficient non-viral vectors with reduced cytotoxicity when used in serum containing environments. Int J Pharm 427:71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.10.032

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen F, Huang G, Huang H (2020) Preparation and application of dextran and its derivatives as carriers. Int J Biol Macromol 145:827–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Huang G, Huang H (2018) Application of dextran as nanoscale drug carriers. Nanomedicine (Lond) 13:3149–3158. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm-2018-0331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yan G, Warner KS, Zhang J, Sharma S, Gale BK (2010) Evaluation needle length and density of microneedle arrays in the pretreatment of skin for transdermal drug delivery. Int J Pharm 391:7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.02.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gauglitz GG, Korting HC, Pavicic T, Ruzicka T, Jeschke MG (2011) Hypertrophic scarring and keloids: pathomechanisms and current and emerging treatment strategies. Mol Med 17:113–125. https://doi.org/10.2119/molmed.2009.00153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Limandjaja GC, van den Broek LJ, Waaijman T et al (2017) Increased epidermal thickness and abnormal epidermal differentiation in keloid scars. Br J Dermatol 176:116–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.14844

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang Y, Xia L, Ning X, Hu T, Xu C, Liu W (2021) Enhanced drug permeation into human keloid tissues by sonophoresis-assisted microneedling. SLAS Technol 26:660–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/24726303211024568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Acosta S, Ureta E, Yañez R, Oliva N, Searle S, Guerra C (2016) Effectiveness of intralesional triamcinolone in the treatment of keloids in children. Pediatr Dermatol 33:75–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/pde.12746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gold MH, McGuire M, Mustoe TA et al (2014) Updated international clinical recommendations on scar management: part 2—algorithms for scar prevention and treatment. Dermatol Surg 40:825–831. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsu.0000000000000050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ud-Din S, Bowring A, Derbyshire B, Morris J, Bayat A (2013) Identification of steroid sensitive responders versus non-responders in the treatment of keloid disease. Arch Dermatol Res 305:423–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-013-1328-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhuang Z, Li Y, Wei X (2021) The safety and efficacy of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide for keloids and hypertrophic scars: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Burns 47:987–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2021.02.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lin S, Quan G, Hou A et al (2019) Strategy for hypertrophic scar therapy: Improved delivery of triamcinolone acetonide using mechanically robust tip-concentrated dissolving microneedle array. J Control Release 306:69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.05.038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tan CWX, Tan WD, Srivastava R, Yow AP, Wong DWK, Tey HL (2019) Dissolving triamcinolone-embedded microneedles for the treatment of keloids: a single-blinded intra-individual controlled clinical trial. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 9:601–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-019-00316-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All microneedle used in the study were provided by the National Nanotechnology Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

W.D. and J.L. conceived and designed the analysis. N.S and B.S. collected the data. W.D. and N.S. contributed data or analysis tools. W.D. performed the analysis and wrote the paper. J.L. provided all of the microneedles using in this study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wareeporn Disphanurat.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no financial or non-financial competing interest.

Ethics approval

This prospective randomized, double-blind, split-scar controlled trial was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Thammasat University, Thailand (MTU-EC-IM-4-037/643). The study was conducted in accordance with good clinical practice guidelines and the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to treatment.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Disphanurat, W., Sivapornpan, N., Srisantithum, B. et al. Efficacy of a triamcinolone acetonide-loaded dissolving microneedle patch for the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled split-scar study. Arch Dermatol Res 315, 989–997 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-022-02473-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-022-02473-6

Keywords

Navigation