Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluating dermatology journals’ use of reporting guidelines in “Author Guidelines”

  • Short Report
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Plint AC, Moher D, Morrison A et al (2006) Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review. Med J Aust 185(5):263–267. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alvarez F, Meyer N, Gourraud PA, Paul C (2009) CONSORT adoption and quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: a systematic analysis in two dermatology journals. Br J Dermatol 161:1159–1165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blanco D, Schroter S, Aldcroft A et al (2020) Effect of an editorial intervention to improve the completeness of reporting of randomised trials: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 10:e036799. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036799

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim DY, Park HS, Cho S, Yoon HS (2019) The quality of reporting randomized controlled trials in the dermatology literature in an era where the CONSORT statement is a standard. Br J Dermatol 180:1361–1367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Journal Rankings on Dermatology (2020) https://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?category=2708. Accessed 23 June 2020

  6. Your one-stop-shop for writing and publishing high-impact health research (2020) The EQUATOR Network. https://www.equator-network.org/. Accessed 23 July 2020

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pavane L. Gorrepati.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gorrepati, P.L., Smith, G.P. Evaluating dermatology journals’ use of reporting guidelines in “Author Guidelines”. Arch Dermatol Res 315, 1421–1423 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-022-02427-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-022-02427-y

Keywords

Navigation