Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cost effectiveness of melanoma in situ resection and repair by dermatology compared to non-dermatology specialties at a single institution

  • Short Report
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Melanoma-in-situ (MIS) is treated with surgical resection by many specialties. Dermatologists perform these procedures in outpatient settings while others often employ operating rooms and general anesthesia. We hypothesized that MIS managed by dermatology was less costly than that managed by other specialties. All cases of MIS treated at our institution over a 3-year period were evaluated retrospectively for demographic and clinical characteristics and categorized by treating specialty. Estimated cost information was determined using records of charges billed. The mean total cost for MIS treated with wide local excision (WLE) by dermatologists was $1089 (CI = $941–1237) versus all other specialties at $5172 (CI = $2419–7925) (p < 0.001). MIS treated with Mohs micrographic surgery and repaired by dermatology (mean = $2325, CI = $2241–2409) was also less expensive than MIS treated by other specialties with WLE (p < 0.001). The results suggest MIS is significantly less costly to patients and the health care system when treatment is performed by dermatologists compared to other surgical specialties. This is likely due to dermatologists performing the procedures in less expensive outpatient settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Swetter SM, Tsao H, Bichakjian CK, Curiel-Lewandrowski C et al (2019) Guidelines of care for the management of primary cutaneous melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 80(1):208–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2018.08.055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nosrati A, Berliner JG, Goel S, McGuire J et al (2017) Outcomes of melanoma in situ treated with mohs micrographic surgery compared with wide local excision. JAMA Dermatol 153(5):436–441. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.6138

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson RP, Butala N, Alam M, Lawrence N (2017) A retrospective case-matched cost comparison of surgical treatment of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer in the outpatient versus operating room setting. Dermatol Surg 43(7):897–901. https://doi.org/10.1097/dss.0000000000001069

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Massey PR, Gupta S, Rothstein BE, Konnikov N et al (2021) Total margin-controlled excision is superior to standard excision for keratinocyte carcinoma on the nose: a veterans affairs nested cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol 28:3656–3663. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09604-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Connolly SM, Baker DR, Coldiron BM, Fazio MJ et al (2012) AAD/ACMS/ASDSA/ASMS 2012 appropriate use criteria for Mohs micrographic surgery: a report of the American Academy of Dermatology, American College of Mohs Surgery, American Society for Dermatologic Surgery Association and the American Society for Mohs Surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol 67(4):531–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2012.06.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the critical contributions of Cindy Kao, Robert McMullen, and James Buckley to the retrieval and interpretation of cost data for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. The majority of procedures analyzed were performed by DS and RIN. Data collection, chart review and cost estimates were performed by KB, KL, AH and MOB. Data analysis and table construction were performed by KS. The first draft of the manuscript was written by KB and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajiv I. Nijhawan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was waived by the UT Southwestern IRB in view of the retrospective nature of the study and all the procedures being performed were part of routine care.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burningham, K.M., Le, K., He, A. et al. Cost effectiveness of melanoma in situ resection and repair by dermatology compared to non-dermatology specialties at a single institution. Arch Dermatol Res 315, 661–663 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-022-02405-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-022-02405-4

Keywords

Navigation