Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors affecting outcomes of second intent healing of nasal defects after Mohs micrographic surgery

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reconstruction of nasal defects secondary to Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) presents particular challenges related to the complex topography, skin quality, tissue laxity, and functional and aesthetic concerns of the region. Factors affecting outcomes resulting from second intent healing (SIH) on the nose have not been well described. The purpose of the study was to identify factors impacting outcomes of SIH for nasal tumors following MMS. Retrospective analysis was performed of all nasal lesions treated with MMS followed by SIH from a single surgical center over a 1.5-year period. Ninety-six cases were included. Chart review was performed, and data were collected including age, gender, nasal site, tumor type, defect size, depth, and number of MMS stages. Pre- and post-operative follow-up photographs were available for all cases. All five authors evaluated the photographs using the modified Manchester scar scale. Analysis was then conducted to identify features associated with good outcomes. Of the 96 tumors, 39 lesions (40.6%) were located on the nasal tip (including supratip), 32 (33.3%) on the ala/alar groove, 17 (17.7%) on the sidewall, and 8 (8.3%) on the dorsum. The average defect size was 0.83 cm2 (diameter of 1.06 cm ± 0.4). Defect diameter and defect depth were the factors that significantly impacted scar outcome (p < 0.001) in multivariate analysis. No significant functional deficits were reported. This retrospective study suggests that nasal defects with area less than 0.83 cm2 (or 1.06 cm diameter) and depth of defect not extending beyond the superficial fat healed well by SIH regardless of location on the nose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bradford PT (2009) Skin cancer in skin of color. Dermatol Nurs 21(4):170–178

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bolognia J et al (2012) Dermatology. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ge NN, McGuire JF, Dyson S, Chark D (2009) Nonmelanoma skin cancer of the head and neck II: surgical treatment and reconstruction. Am J Otolaryngol 30(3):181–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mott KJ, Clark DP, Stelljes LS (2003) Regional variation in wound contraction of Mohs surgery defects allowed to heal by second intention. Dermatol Surg 29:712–722

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zitelli JA (1983) Wound healing by secondary intention. A cosmetic appraisal. J Am Acad Dermatol 9:407–415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cook JL, Perone JB (2003) A prospective evaluation of the incidence of complications associated with Mohs micrographic surgery. Arch Dermatol 139:143–152. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.139.2.143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jang JU et al (2016) Comparison of the effectiveness of ablative and non-ablative fractional laser treatments for early stage thyroidectomy scars. Arch Plast Surg 43(6):575–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu KY, Silvestri B, Marquez J, Huston TL (2020) Secondary intention healing after Mohs surgical excision as an alternative to surgical repair: evaluation of wound characteristics and esthetic outcomes. Ann Plast Surg 85(S1 Suppl 1):S28–S32. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Qian YL, Zhang YX, Yang J, Wang DR, Zhang YG (2005) Microsurgical reconstruction of the nasal subunit defects. Chin J Plastic Surg 21(6):457–460

    Google Scholar 

  10. Weathers WM, Koshy JC, Wolfswinkel EM, Thornton JF (2013) Overview of nasal soft tissue reconstruction: keeping it simple. Semin Plast Surg 27(2):83–89. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1351226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rahman M, Jefferson N, Stewart DA, Oliver R, Walsh WR, Gianoutsos MP (2010) The histology of facial aesthetic subunits: implications for common nasal reconstructive procedures. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63(5):753–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2009.02.066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rittié L (2016) Cellular mechanisms of skin repair in humans and other mammals. J Cell Commun Signal 10(2):103–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12079-016-0330-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoasjoe DK, Stucker FJ (1995) Rhinophyma: review of pathophysiology and treatment. J Otolaryngol 24(1):51–56

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldwyn RM, Rueckert F (1977) The value of healing by secondary intention for sizeable defects of the face. Arch Surg 112(3):285–292. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1977.01370030057010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathleen C. Suozzi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, D.NW., Kibbi, N., Christensen, S.R. et al. Factors affecting outcomes of second intent healing of nasal defects after Mohs micrographic surgery. Arch Dermatol Res 315, 67–73 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-021-02306-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-021-02306-y

Keywords

Navigation