Skip to main content
Log in

Challenges of securing insurance approval for oral tofacitinib for the treatment of alopecia areata: a multi-institution retrospective review

Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

Alopecia areata (AA) is a psychologically distressing disorder for which few reliable treatments exist. Although oral tofacitinib has demonstrated efficacy in treating AA, it is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for this indication. To investigate and identify the challenges associated with securing insurance approval for oral tofacitinib for AA. We conducted a retrospective review of patient records from two academic medical centers to identify patients with AA in whom insurance approval was sought for oral tofacitinib from 2015–2019. We recorded information on prior authorization (PA) submissions, appeals, and peer-to-peer reviews. We noted whether patients were documented to experience negative impact on mood/QOL or suicidal ideation (SI) due to their disease. We identified 37 patients in whom insurance approval was sought for oral tofacitinib for the treatment of AA. PAs were initially denied for 36/37 (97%) patients. The most commonly cited reason for denial was “tofacitinib not covered for AA/off-label medication use” (n = 26/36; 72%). 26/37 (70%) patients ultimately failed to obtain coverage. Of the 11 (30%) patients who obtained coverage, 10 (91%) were privately insured, 0 (0%) had Medicare and 1 (9%) had Medicaid. 13 patients (34%) experienced documented diminished QOL/mood (including SI) due to their disease burden; 6/13 (46%) of these patients eventually secured insurance approval. Lack of FDA approval of oral tofacitinib for the treatment of AA creates challenges in caring for patients with this disease. Policymakers should consider the negative implications lack of FDA approval may have for patients with recalcitrant dermatologic conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  1. Gilhar A, Etzioni A, Paus R (2012) Alopecia areata. N Engl J Med 366(16):1515–1525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Strazzulla LC, Wang EH, Avila L et al (2018) Alopecia areata: an appraisal of new treatment approaches and overview of current therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol 78(1):15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Crispin MK, Ko JM, Craiglow BG et al (2016) Safety and efficacy of the JAK inhibitor tofacitinib citrate in patients with alopecia areata. JCI Insight 1:15

    Google Scholar 

  4. Almutairi N, Nour TM, Hussain NH (2019) Janus kinase inhibitors for the treatment of severe alopecia areata: an open-label comparative study. Dermatology 235(2):130–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jabbari A, Sansaricq F, Cerise J et al (2018) An open-label pilot study to evaluate the efficacy of tofacitinib in moderate to severe patch-type alopecia areata, totalis, and universalis. J Invest Dermatol 138(7):1539–1545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Xeljanz Prices, Coupons and Savings Tips. GoodRx. https://www.goodrx.com/xeljanz. (Accessed 10 Apr 2020).

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SD and KL contributed equally to this manuscript as co-first authors. AL and RAV contributed equally to this manuscript as co-senior authors. RAV and AL led the study team and conceptualized the study. All authors contributed to the study design. SD and KL contributed to data collection, data analysis and data interpretation. VN contributed to data interpretation and presentation. SD prepared the first draft of the manuscript, which was subsequently revised and edited by all authors for critical content.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruth Ann Vleugels.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethics approval

This study was deemed exempt by the Partners Institutional Review Board (IRB).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Sheena Desai and Kelly Lo co-first authors.

Avery LaChance and Ruth Ann Vleugels co-last authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Desai, S., Lo, K., Nambudiri, V.E. et al. Challenges of securing insurance approval for oral tofacitinib for the treatment of alopecia areata: a multi-institution retrospective review. Arch Dermatol Res 314, 487–489 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-020-02158-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-020-02158-y

Keywords

Navigation