Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on infection rates in mohs micrographic surgery: a single-institution retrospective study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As data and recommendations regarding antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery vary, we tried to describe the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) in Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) on infective endocarditis, prosthetic joint infection, and surgical site infection using a single-institution retrospective cohort study of antibiotic use (pre-/intra-operative, post-operative or none) among 2,364 patient encouters treated with MMS. Bivariate logistic regression was evaluated for associations between patient and operative characteristics, antibiotic use, and infectious complications. 85.8% of patients received no AP, 10.0% received post-operative AP, and 4.1% received pre-/intra-operative AP. The overall surgical site infection (SSI) rate was 1.3%. SSI did not differ between patients who received pre-/intra-operative prophylaxis, post-operative prophylaxis or no antibiotics. One patient receiving pre-/intra-operative prophylaxis developed SSI. Repairs involving porcine xenografts and interpolation/pedicle flaps were associated with increased SSI. In addition, there were no patients who post-operatively experienced an infected joint or infective endocarditis. Limitations include selection bias, use of observational retrospective data, low infection rates, single institution analysis, and possible omission of explanatory variables or confounders. There was no difference in rates of SSI when comparing MMS patients who received pre-/intra-operative, post-operative or no AP. There were no cases of infective endocarditis or infected prosthetic joint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Code Availability

Available upon request.

References

  1. Alam M, Ibrahim O, Nodzenski M et al (2013) Adverse events associated with mohs micrographic surgery: multicenter prospective cohort study of 20,821 cases at 23 centers. JAMA Dermatol 149(12):1378–1385. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Levin EC, Chow C, Makhzoumi Z, Jin C, Shiboski SC, Arron ST (2019) Association of postoperative antibiotics with surgical site infection in mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Surg 45(1):52–57. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000001645

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bae-Harboe Y-SC, Liang CA (2013) Perioperative antibiotic use of dermatologic surgeons in 2012. Dermatol Surg 39(11):1592–1601 https://doi.org/10.1111/dsu.12272

  4. Wright TI, Baddour LM, Berbari EF et al (2008) Antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery: advisory statement 2008. J Am Acad Dermatol 59(3):464–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2008.04.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosengren H, Heal CF, Buttner PG (2018) Effect of a single prophylactic preoperative oral antibiotic dose on surgical site infection following complex dermatological procedures on the nose and ear: A prospective, randomised, controlled, double-blinded trial. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Rogers HD, Desciak EB, Marcus RP, Wang S, MacKay-Wiggan J, Eliezri YD (2010) Prospective study of wound infections in Mohs micrographic surgery using clean surgical technique in the absence of prophylactic antibiotics. J Am Acad Dermatol 63(5):842–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2010.07.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Martin JE, Speyer L-A, Schmults CD (2010) Heightened infection-control practices are associated with significantly lower infection rates in office-based Mohs surgery. Dermatol Surg 36(10):1529–1536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01677.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hurst EA, Grekin RC, Yu SS, Neuhaus IM (2007) Infectious complications and antibiotic use in dermatologic surgery. Semin Cutan Med Surg 26(1):47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sder.2006.12.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Scheinfeld N, Struach S, Ross B (2002) Antibiotic prophylaxis guideline awareness and antibiotic prophylaxis use among New York State dermatologic surgeons. Dermatol Surg 28(9):841–844. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.02033.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Allegranzi B, Zayed B, Bischoff P et al (2016) New WHO recommendations on intraoperative and postoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective. Lancet Infect Dis 16(12):e288–e303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30402-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Barbieri JS, Fix WC, Miller CJ et al (2019) Variation in prescribing and factors associated with the use of prophylactic antibiotics for mohs surgery: a single-institution retrospective study. Dermatol Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000002203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Barbieri JS, Etzkorn JR, Margolis DJ (2019) Use of antibiotics for dermatologic procedures from 2008 to 2016. JAMA Dermatol 155(4):465–470. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.0152

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Miles BA, Potter JK, Ellis E (2006) The efficacy of postoperative antibiotic regimens in the open treatment of mandibular fractures: a prospective randomized trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64(4):576–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.01.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Andrews PJ, East CA, Jayaraj SM, Badia L, Panagamuwa C, Harding L (2006) Prophylactic vs postoperative antibiotic use in complex septorhinoplasty surgery: a prospective, randomized, single-blind trial comparing efficacy. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 8(2):84–87. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.8.2.84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu S-A, Tung K-C, Shiao J-Y, Chiu Y-T (2008) Preliminary report of associated factors in wound infection after major head and neck neoplasm operations–does the duration of prophylactic antibiotic matter? J Laryngol Otol 122(4):403–408. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215107007529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nuyen B, Kandathil CK, Laimi K, Rudy SF, Most SP, Saltychev M (2019) Evaluation of antibiotic prophylaxis in rhinoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 21(1):12–17. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Anigian KT, Miller T, Constantine RS et al (2014) Effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics in outpatient plastic surgery. Aesthetic Surg J 34(8):1252–1258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X14545984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Elliott TG, Thom GA, Litterick KA (2012) Office based dermatological surgery and Mohs surgery: a prospective audit of surgical procedures and complications in a procedural dermatology practice. Australas J Dermatol 53(4):264–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-0960.2012.00951.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu A, Lawrence N (2014) Incidence of infection after Mohs micrographic and dermatologic surgery before and after implementation of new sterilization guidelines. J Am Acad Dermatol 70(6):1088–1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2014.02.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller MQ, Stevens JS, Park SS, Christophel JJ (2020) Do postoperative antibiotics affect outcomes in mohs reconstructive surgery? Laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection (2016) https://www.who.int. Accessed Dec 17, 2019

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mr. Antonio Garcia and Ms. Sophia Tran for their assistance with data collection.

Funding

This article has no funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by all authors. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Jeffrey Niu Li and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajiv I. Nijhawan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Ethics approval

Reviewed and approved by UT Southwestern IRB, approval STU-2019–0646.

Availability of Data and Material

Available upon request.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taylor, O., Li, J.N., Carr, C. et al. The effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on infection rates in mohs micrographic surgery: a single-institution retrospective study. Arch Dermatol Res 313, 663–667 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-020-02153-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-020-02153-3

Keywords

Navigation