Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Readability of online Spanish patient education materials in dermatology

  • Concise Communication
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Decreased health literacy is associated with worse outcomes for a variety of dermatologic conditions. Hispanic adults have the lowest average health literacy of any racial or ethnic group in the United Sates. Although patients are increasingly using online patient education materials (PEMs) for dermatologic care, limited information exists regarding the readability of these resources. The objective of this study is to evaluate the readability of online Spanish language PEMs in dermatology. Online Spanish language PEMs relevant to dermatology were gathered from the United States National Library of Medicine (USNLM) MedlinePlus health library and top Google, Yahoo, and Bing search results for “Spanish patient education dermatology.” Spanish text was analyzed for readability using two validated programs: Spanish Lexile Analyzer and Índice Flesch-Szigriszt (INFLESZ). Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to examine the association between the two readability measures. ANOVA without post hoc correction was performed to determine variability between PEMs. A total of 254 Spanish language PEMs were collected and analyzed from nine online sources. The average article length was 601 words. The average Lexile measure was 1005 L (SD = 144 L) and the average INFLESZ score was 64.60 (SD = 7.53). Readability scores equated to an 8–10th grade reading level and was varied based on the source of information (p < 0.001). Online Spanish language PEMs related to dermatology are generally written at a reading level that exceeds national recommendations and may reduce comprehension for Hispanic patients. Targeted initiatives to address and improve online health information for Spanish-speaking patients are warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Crotty K (2011) Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med 155(2):97–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fox S, Duggan M. Health Online 2013. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. https://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/. Published January 15, 2013.

  3. Jacobson TA, Thomas DM, Morton FJ, Offutt G, Shevlin J, Ray S (1999) Use of a low-literacy patient education tool to enhance pneumococcal vaccination rates: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 282(7):646–650

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tulbert BH, Snyder CW, Brodell RT (2011) Readability of patient-oriented online dermatology resources. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 4(3):27–33

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kutner M, Greenberg E, Jin Y, Paulsen C. The Health Literacy of America’s Adults: Results From the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2006–483). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

  6. Nassif SJ, Wong K, Levi JR (2018) The Índice Flesch-Szigriszt and Spanish Lexile Analyzer to evaluate Spanish patient education materials in otolaryngology. Laryngoscope 128(1):E21–E26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Piel, cabello y uñas: MedlinePlus en español. MedlinePlus. https://medlineplus.gov/spanish/skinhairandnails.html.

  8. Volsky PG, Baldassari CM, Mushti S, Derkay CS (2012) Quality of Internet information in pediatric otolaryngology: a comparison of three most referenced websites. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 76(9):1312–1316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. About MedlinePlus. MedlinePlus, U.S. National Library of Medicine. https://medlineplus.gov/aboutmedlineplus.html. Published April 1, 2019.

  10. Lexile Analyzer® User Guide. Free Lexile Analyzer®. https://la-tools.lexile.com/help/. Accessed July 8, 2019.

  11. Barrio-cantalejo IM, Simón-lorda P, Melguizo M, Escalona I, Marijuán MI, Hernando P (2008) Validation of the INFLESZ scale to evaluate readability of texts aimed at the patient. An Sist Sanit Navar 31(2):135–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Williamson GL, Koons H, Sandvik T, Sanford-Moore E. The Text Complexity Continuum in Grades 1–12. MetaMetrics Inc. 2012.

  13. Barrio I. El programa INFLESZ. legibilidad.com. https://legibilidad.blogspot.com/2015/01/el-programa-inflesz.html. Published January 11, 2015.

  14. Escarce JJ, Kapur K (2006) Access to and Quality of Health Care. In: Tienda M, Mitchell F (ed) Hispanics and the Future of America. National Academies Press (US), Washington DC.

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Rishabh S. Mazmudar, Raghav Tripathi & Jeffrey F. Scott

  2. Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Lakeside 3500, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA

    Rishabh S. Mazmudar & Raghav Tripathi

  3. Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA

    Anjani Sheth

Authors
  1. Rishabh S. Mazmudar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anjani Sheth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Raghav Tripathi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jeffrey F. Scott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rishabh S. Mazmudar.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this work.

Ethical standards

Exempt from review and approval by the University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center Institutional Review Board.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 49 kb)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 49 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mazmudar, R.S., Sheth, A., Tripathi, R. et al. Readability of online Spanish patient education materials in dermatology. Arch Dermatol Res 313, 201–204 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-020-02036-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-020-02036-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation