Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of the pathogenicity of anti-desmoglein antibodies of pemphigus vulgaris patients using human organ culture assay

  • Concise Communication
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anti-desmoglein (anti-Dsg) antibodies are key players in the pathogenesis of pemphigus vulgaris (PV) disease. We aimed to evaluate the pathogenicity of anti-Dsg antibodies of PV patients using human organ culture assay and to assess the correlation between the pathogenicity and the disease score. In this cross-sectional study, sera from 37 PV patients were included. The organ culture acantholysis index (OCAI) was calculated as (width of blister/total width of the specimen) × 100. The sera were analyzed using Dsg ELISAs and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) treated ELISAs. OCAI ranged from 0 to 100%, median = 50%. There was a moderate significant correlation between OCAI and the disease severity, r = 0.503, p = 0.002. There was a moderate significant correlation between OCAI and non-Ca2+-dependent anti-Dsg3 and anti-Dsg1 antibodies, p values were 0.01 and 0.021, respectively. The OCAI was assessed along the disease time course of four patients. The OCAI fluctuated parallel to the disease severity along the time course of the four patients. Human organ culture assay is an objective tool that detects the pathogenicity of anti-desmoglein antibodies. It can be used before stopping systemic steroids especially in patients in remission with high titer or if the Dsg ELISA is not available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Amagai M, Tsunoda K, Zillikens D, Nagai T, Nishikawa T (1999) The clinical phenotype of pemphigus is defined by the anti-desmoglein autoantibody profile. J Am Acad Dermatol 40(2 Pt 1):167–170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Amagai M (2006) Non-pathogenic anti-desmoglein 3 IgG autoantibodies in Fogo Selvagem. J Invest Dermatol 126(9):1931–1932

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hammers CM, Stanley JR (2016) Mechanisms of disease: pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid. Annu Rev Pathol 11:175–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Hilario-Vargas J, Dasher DA, Li N, Aoki V, Hans-Filho G, dos Santos V et al (2006) Prevalence of anti-desmoglein-3 antibodies in endemic regions of Fogo selvagem in Brazil. J Invest Dermatol 126(9):2044–2048

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ishii K, Harada R, Matsuo I, Shirakata Y, Hashimoto K, Amagai M (2005) In vitro keratinocyte dissociation assay for evaluation of the pathogenicity of anti-desmoglein 3 IgG autoantibodies in pemphigus vulgaris. J Invest Dermatol 124(5):939–946

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ito Y, Kasai H, Yoshida T, Saleh MA, Amagai M, Yamagami J (2013) Anti-type VII collagen autoantibodies, detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, fluctuate in parallel with clinical severity in patients with epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. J Dermatol 40(11):864–868

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jamora MJ, Jiao D, Bystryn JC (2003) Antibodies to desmoglein 1 and 3, and the clinical phenotype of pemphigus vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol 48(6):976–977

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kamiya K, Aoyama Y, Shirafuji Y, Hamada T, Morizane S, Fujii K et al (2012) Detection of antibodies against the non-calcium-dependent epitopes of desmoglein 3 in pemphigus vulgaris and their pathogenic significance. Br J Dermatol 167(2):252–261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kwon EJ, Yamagami J, Nishikawa T, Amagai M (2008) Anti-desmoglein IgG autoantibodies in patients with pemphigus in remission. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 22(9):1070–1075

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mahoney MG, Wang Z, Rothenberger K, Koch PJ, Amagai M, Stanley JR (1999) Explanations for the clinical and microscopic localization of lesions in pemphigus foliaceus and vulgaris. J Clin Invest 103(4):461–468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Michel B, Ko CS (1977) An organ culture model for the study of pemphigus acantholysis. Br J Dermatol 96(3):295–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Payne AS, Ishii K, Kacir S, Lin C, Li H, Hanakawa Y et al (2005) Genetic and functional characterization of human pemphigus vulgaris monoclonal autoantibodies isolated by phage display. J Clin Invest 115(4):888–899

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenbach M, Murrell DF, Bystryn JC, Dulay S, Dick S, Fakharzadeh S et al (2009) Reliability and convergent validity of two outcome instruments for pemphigus. J Invest Dermatol 129(10):2404–2410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Saleh MA (2018) A prospective study comparing patients with early and late relapsing pemphigus treated with rituximab. J Am Acad Dermatol 79(1):97–103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Saleh MA (2015) Pemphigus in the Arab World. J Dermatol 42(1):27–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Saleh MA, El-Bahy MM (2015) Do normal Egyptians possess anti-desmoglein 3 antibodies? Int J Dermatol 54(10):1145–1149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Saleh MA, Ishii K, Yamagami J, Shirakata Y, Hashimoto K, Amagai M (2012) Pathogenic anti-desmoglein 3 mAbs cloned from a paraneoplastic pemphigus patient by phage display. J Invest Dermatol 132(4):1141–1148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schiltz JR, Michel B, Papay R (1978) Pemphigus antibody interaction with human epidermal cells in culture. J Clin Invest 62(4):778–788

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sinistro A, Calabresi V, Lupi F, Sera F, Frezzolini A, Ruffelli M et al (2015) The pathogenic activity of anti-desmoglein autoantibodies parallels disease severity in rituximab-treated patients with pemphigus vulgaris. Eur J Dermatol 25(6):578–585

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsunoda K, Ota T, Aoki M, Yamada T, Nagai T, Nakagawa T et al (2003) Induction of pemphigus phenotype by a mouse monoclonal antibody against the amino-terminal adhesive interface of desmoglein 3. J Immunol 170(4):2170–2178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yoshida K, Ishii K, Shimizu A, Yokouchi M, Amagai M, Shiraishi K et al (2017) Non-pathogenic pemphigus foliaceus (PF) IgG acts synergistically with a directly pathogenic PF IgG to increase blistering by p38MAPK-dependent desmoglein 1 clustering. J Dermatol Sci 85(3):197–207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marwah Adly Saleh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 846 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saleh, A.M., El-Samanoudy, S.I., Rashed, L.A. et al. Evaluation of the pathogenicity of anti-desmoglein antibodies of pemphigus vulgaris patients using human organ culture assay. Arch Dermatol Res 312, 289–294 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-019-01988-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-019-01988-9

Keywords

Navigation