Abstract
This study assessed social media content to improve understanding of patient experiences with Mohs surgery. An initial search of public Instagram posts and tweets tagged with “#mohssurgery” or “@mohssurgery” identified 1692 Instagram posts and 115 tweets, of which 1390 and 94 were eliminated, respectively, given that they did not directly include a patient’s own experience. The team analyzed the posts/tweets for patient gender, timing of post prior to or after their procedure, and classified themes related to patients’ experience with Mohs. Analysis showed that 91.4% of Instagram posts and 75.0% of tweets were published post-Mohs surgery, with the majority made by women. The most common theme on Twitter was updating followers on treatment progress (30.0%) and on Instagram, the most common theme was spreading awareness of skin cancer/encouraging others to protect their skin (18.9%). Other common themes included concern of appearance during recovery process, scars after treatment, and healing progress. Social media has the ability to provide a platform for patients to impart their personal experiences with Mohs surgery performed on skin cancer lesions.
References
Chandrasekaran N, Gressick K, Singh V et al (2017) The utility of social media in providing information on Zika virus. Cureus 9(10):e1792
Duggan M (2015) Demographics of social media users in 2015. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/19/the-demographics-of-social-media-users/. Accessed 1 Nov 2018
Hewis J, Do MRI (2015) Patients tweet? Thematic analysis of patient tweets about their MRI experience. J Med Imag Radiat Sci 46(4):396–402
Jacobs R, Prabhu AV, Monaco EA, Tonetti D, Agarwal N (2018) Patient perception of gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery through twitter and instagram. Interdiscip Neurosurg 13:138–140
Kim AE, Hansen HM, Murphy J, Richards AK, Duke J, Allen JA (2013) Methodological considerations in analyzing Twitter data. J Nat Cancer Inst Monogr 2013(47):140–146
Larson K, Russell M (2016) A retrospective study of Mohs micrographic surgery trends over 20 years in a university medical center. J Am Acad Dermatol 74(5):84
Lee EH, Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Nehal KS, Pusic AL (2018) FACE-Q Skin Cancer Module for measuring patient-reported outcomes following facial skin cancer surgery. Br J Dermatol 179(1):88–94
Meleo-Erwin Z, Basch C, MacLean SA, Scheibner C, Cadorett V (2017) “To each his own”: discussions of vaccine decision-making in top parenting blogs. Hum Vaccines Immunother 13(8):1895–1901
Pershad Y, Hangge PT, Albadawi H, Oklu R (2018) Social medicine: Twitter in healthcare. J Clin Med 7(6):121
Quatrano NA, Mu EW, Orbuch DE, Haimovic A, Geronemus RG, Brauer JA (2018) Demographic and tumor characteristics of patients younger than 50 years with nonmelanoma skin cancer referred for Mohs micrographic surgery. J Drugs Dermatol 17(5):499–505
Rosenkrantz AB, Labib A, Pysarenko K, Prabhu V (2016) What do patients tweet about their mammography experience? Acad Radiol 23(11):1367–1371
Seltzer EK, Horst-Martz E, Lu M, Merchant RM (2017) Public sentiment and discourse about Zika virus on Instagram. Pub Health 150:170–175
Shepherd A, Sanders C, Doyle M, Shaw J (2015) Using social media for support and feedback by mental health service users: thematic analysis of a twitter conversation. BMC Psychiatry 15:29
Waring ME, Jake-Schoffman DE, Holovatska MM, Mejia C, Williams JC, Pagoto SL (2018) Social media and obesity in adults: a review of recent research and future directions. Curr DiabRep 18(6):34
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kamath, P., Kursewicz, C., Ingrasci, G. et al. Analysis of patient perceptions of Mohs surgery on social media platforms. Arch Dermatol Res 311, 731–734 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-019-01944-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-019-01944-7