Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The safety and efficacy of bacterial nanocellulose wound dressing incorporating sericin and polyhexamethylene biguanide: in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In our previous work, we have attempted to develop a novel bacterial nanocellulose wound dressing which composed of both polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) as an antimicrobial agent and sericin as an accelerative wound healing component. The loading sequence and concentration of PHMB and sericin were optimized to provide the wound dressing with the most effective antimicrobial activity and enhanced collagen production. In this study, further in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies of this novel wound dressing were performed to evaluate its safety, efficacy, and applicability. For the in vitro cytotoxic test with L929 mouse fibroblast cells, our novel dressing was not toxic to the cells and also promoted cell migration as good as the commercially available dressing, possibly due to the component of sericin released. When implanted subcutaneously in rats, the lower inflammation response was observed for the novel dressing implanted, comparing to the commercially available dressing. This might be that the antimicrobial PHMB component of the novel dressing played a role to reduce infection and inflammation reaction. The clinical trial patch test was performed on the normal skin of healthy volunteers to evaluate the irritation effect of the dressing. Our novel dressing did not irritate the skin of any volunteers, as characterized by the normal levels of erythema and melanin and the absence of edema, papule, vesicle, and bullae. Then, the novel dressing was applied for the treatment of full-thickness wounds in rats. The wounds treated with our novel dressing showed significantly lower percentage of wound size and higher extent of collagen formation mainly due to the activity of sericin. We concluded that our novel bacterial nanocellulose incorporating PHMB and sericin was a safe and efficient wound dressing material for further investigation in the wound healing efficacy in clinic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alvarez OM, Patel M, Booker J, Markowitz L (2004) effectiveness of a biocellulose wound dressing for the treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers: results of a single center randomized study involving 24 patients. Wounds 16(7):224–233

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aramwit P, Bang N (2014) The characteristics of bacterial nanocellulose gel releasing silk sericin for facial treatment. BMC Biotechnol 14:104

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aramwit P, Bang N, Ratanavaraporn J, Nakpheng T, Srichana T (2014) An anti-cancer cordycepin produced by Cordyceps militaris growing on the dead larva of Bombyx mori Silkworm. J Agr Sci 6(6):41–53

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aramwit P, Kanokpanont S, De-Eknamkul W, Kamei K, Srichana T (2009) The effect of sericin with variable amino-acid content from different silk strains on the production of collagen and nitric oxide. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 20(9):1295–1306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aramwit P, Kanokpanont S, De-Eknamkul W, Srichana T (2009) Monitoring of inflammatory mediators induced by silk sericin. J Biosci Bioeng 107(5):556–561

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aramwit P, Kanokpanont S, Nakpheng T, Srichana T (2010) The effect of sericin from various extraction methods on cell viability and collagen production. Int J Mol Sci 11(5):2200–2211

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aramwit P, Sangcakul A (2007) The effects of sericin cream on wound healing in rats. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 71(10):2473–2477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chaby G, Viseux V, Poulain JF, De Cagny B, Denoeux JP, Lok C (2005) Topical silver sulfadiazine-induced acute renal failure. Ann Dermatol Venereol 132(11 Pt 1):891–893

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cuttle L, Kempf M, Phillips GE, Mill J, Hayes MT, Fraser JF, Wang XQ, Kimble RM (2006) A porcine deep dermal partial thickness burn model with hypertrophic scarring. Burns 32(7):806–820

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Czaja W, Krystynowicz A, Bielecki S, Brown RM Jr (2006) Microbial cellulose—the natural power to heal wounds. Biomaterials 27(2):145–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Eberlein T, Haemmerle G, Signer M, Gruber Moesenbacher U, Traber J, Mittlboeck M, Abel M, Strohal R (2012) Comparison of PHMB-containing dressing and silver dressings in patients with critically colonised or locally infected wounds. J Wound Care 21(1):12, 14–16, 18–20

  12. Gibran NS, Boyce S, Greenhalgh DG (2007) Cutaneous wound healing. J Burn Care Res 28(4):577–579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hasatsri S, Yamdech R, Chanvorachote P, Aramwit P (2015) Physical and biological assessments of the innovative bilayered wound dressing made of silk and gelatin for clinical applications. J Biomater Appl 29(9):1304–1313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lenselink E, Andriessen A (2011) A cohort study on the efficacy of a polyhexanide-containing biocellulose dressing in the treatment of biofilms in wounds. J Wound Care 20(11):534, 536–539

  15. Lin W, Truong N, Grossman WJ, Haribhai D, Williams CB, Wang J, Martin MG, Chatila TA (2005) Allergic dysregulation and hyperimmunoglobulinemia E in Foxp3 mutant mice. J Allergy Clin Immunol 116(5):1106–1115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Loddenkemper C, Schernus M, Noutsias M, Stein H, Thiel E, Nagorsen D (2006) In situ analysis of FOXP3+ regulatory T cells in human colorectal cancer. J Transl Med 4:52

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Maenthaisong R, Chaiyakunapruk N, Warnnissorn P, Viyoch J (2009) Cleansing lotion containing tamarind fruit pulp extract. III. Study of lightening efficacy and skin irritation on Asian skin type. ScienceAsia 35:24–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Moore K, Gray D (2007) Using PHMB antimicrobial to prevent wound infection. Wounds UK 3(2):96–102

    Google Scholar 

  19. Muangman P, Opasanon S, Suwanchot S, Thangthed O (2011) Efficiency of microbial cellulose dressing in partial-thickness burn wounds. J Am Col Certif Wound Spec 3(1):16–19

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Napavichayanun S, Amornsudthiwat P, Pienpinijtham P, Aramwit P (2015) Interaction and effectiveness of antimicrobials along with healing-promoting agents in a novel biocellulose wound dressing. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 55:95–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nouri-Aria KT (2009) Foxp3 expressing regulatory T-cells in allergic disease. Adv Exp Med Biol 665:180–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Roth B, Brill FH (2010) Polyhexanide for wound treatment—how it began. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 23(Suppl):4–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sakaguchi S, Wing K, Miyara M (2007) Regulatory T cells—a brief history and perspective. Eur J Immunol 37(Suppl 1):S116–S123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Siritientong T, Angspatt A, Ratanavaraporn J, Aramwit P (2014) Clinical potential of a silk sericin-releasing bioactive wound dressing for the treatment of split-thickness skin graft donor sites. Pharm Res 31(1):104–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Steinman RM, Hawiger D, Nussenzweig MC (2003) Tolerogenic dendritic cells. Annu Rev Immunol 21:685–711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sullivan PK, Conner-Kerr TA, Hamilton H, Smith EP, Tefertiller C, Webb A (2004) Assessment of wound bioburden development in a rat acute wound model: quantitative swab versus tissue biopsy. Wounds 16(4):115–123

    Google Scholar 

  27. Takahashi H, Ruiz P, Ricordi C, Delacruz V, Miki A, Mita A, Misawa R, Barker S, Burke GW, Tzakis AG, Ichii H (2012) Quantitative in situ analysis of FoxP3+ T regulatory cells on transplant tissue using laser scanning cytometry. Cell Transplant 21(1):113–125

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tateosian NL, Reiteri RM, Amiano NO, Costa MJ, Villalonga X, Guerrieri D, Maffia PC (2011) Neutrophil elastase treated dendritic cells promote the generation of CD4(+)FOXP3(+) regulatory T cells in vitro. Cell Immunol 269(2):128–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Verschuren PG, Cardona TD, Nout MJ, De Gooijer KD, Van den Heuvel JC (2000) Location and limitation of cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum established from oxygen profiles. J Biosci Bioeng 89(5):414–419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vorobjova T, Uibo O, Heilman K, Uibo R (2015) Increased density of tolerogenic dendritic cells in the small bowel mucosa of celiac patients. World J Gastroenterol 21(2):439–452

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang J, Ioan-Facsinay A, van der Voort EI, Huizinga TW, Toes RE (2007) Transient expression of FOXP3 in human activated nonregulatory CD4+ T cells. Eur J Immunol 37(1):129–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge all supports from the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bioactive Resources for Innovative Clinical Applications Research Unit, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Supamas Napavichayanun, Rungnapha Yamdech & Pornanong Aramwit

  2. Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, PhayaThai Road, Phatumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand

    Supamas Napavichayanun & Pornanong Aramwit

Authors
  1. Supamas Napavichayanun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rungnapha Yamdech
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pornanong Aramwit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pornanong Aramwit.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Napavichayanun, S., Yamdech, R. & Aramwit, P. The safety and efficacy of bacterial nanocellulose wound dressing incorporating sericin and polyhexamethylene biguanide: in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies. Arch Dermatol Res 308, 123–132 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-016-1621-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-016-1621-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation