Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Frequency rhythmic electrical modulation system in the treatment of chronic painful leg ulcers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electrical current has been recommended for use on chronic wounds; however, the ability of this modality to improve healing of various types of chronic ulcers, arterial, venous, mixed arterial and venous ulcers, diabetic, and pressure ulcers is not well established. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of frequency rhytmic electrical modulation system (FREMS) on healing of chronic painful leg ulcers.

Thirty-five patients with 43 chronic painful leg ulcers participated in the study. The subjects were separated into two random groups, one treated with FREMS and the control group. Our investigation focused on the control of the parameter changes important for ulcer healing: wound surface area, wound appearance (fibrin accumulations, exudation, granulation, and epithelization), ulcer surroundings and associated symptoms. All the parameters were monitored clinically at the beginning, after first, second, and third week, and at the end, after 1 and 2 months of administered therapy, when the scores were determined. Pain intensity was evaluated with visual analog scale (VAS). FREMS therapy was administrated through the device model Aptiva Ballet into sessions and several stages. Comparing the findings of decrease leg ulcer surface, pain, leg ulcer score, score of vicinity (statistically significant at the level P < 0.05) with the controls, it was established that FREMS system accelerated ulcer healing, reduced pain and demonstrated better effects compared to the control group. The results of the study indicate that FREMS therapy accelerates wound closure and depresses the pain of chronic leg ulcers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alon G, Azaria M, Stein H (1986) Diabetic ulcer healing using high voltage TENS. Phys Ther 66:775

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baker L, Chambers R, DeMuth S, Villar F (1997) Effects of electrical stimulation on wound healing in patients with diabetic ulcers. Diabetes Care 20(3):405–412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bergqvist D, Lindholm C, Nelzen O (1999) Chronic leg ulcers: the impact of venous disease. J Vasc Surg 29(4):752–755

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bevilacqua M, Barrella M, Toscano R et al (2003) Increase of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and decrease of pain by electrical stimulation with high variability in frequency and amplitude (LORENZ). A clinical study in osteoporotic patients with vertebral fractures. 30th European Symposium on Calcified Tissue, Rome

  5. Bevilacqua M, Dominguez LJ, Barrella M, Barbagallo M (2007) Induction of vascular endothelial growth factor release by transcutaneous frequency modulated neural stimulation in diabetic polyneuropathy. J Endocrinol Invest 30:944–947

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bonham P (2003) Assessment and management of patients with venous, arterial, and diabetic/neuropathic lower extremity wounds. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 14(4):442–456

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bosi E, Conti M, Vermigli C, Cazzetta G, Peretti E et al (2005) Effectiveness of frequency-modulated electromagnetic neural stimulation in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy. Diabetologia 48:817–823

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Braddock M, Campbell C, Zuder D (1999) Current therapies for wound healing: electrical stimulation, biological therapeutics, and the potential for gene therapy. Int J Dermatol 38:808–817

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brem H, Kirsner R, Falanga V (2004) Protocol for the successful treatment of venous ulcers. Am J Surg 188:1S–8S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Canedo-Dorantes L, Garcia-Cantu R, Barrera R, Mendez-Ramirez I, Navarro V, Serrano G (2002) Healing of chronic arterial and venous leg ulcers with systemic electromagnetic fields. Arch Med Res 22:281–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cooper S, Hofman D, Burge S (2003) Leg ulcers and pain: a review. Low Extrem Wounds 2(4):189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cukjati D, Robnik-Sikonja M, Rebersek S, Kononenko I, Miklavcic D (2001) Prognostic factors in the prediction of chronic wound healing by electrical stimulation. Med Biol Eng Comput 39:542–550

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cukjati D, Savrin R (2004) Electric current wound healing. In: Rosch PJ, Markov MS (eds) Bioelectromagnetic medicine. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 485–505

    Google Scholar 

  14. Debreceni L, Gyulai M, Debreceni A et al (1995) Results of transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) in cure of lower extremity arterial disease. Angiology 46:613–618

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Farina S, Casarotto M, Benelle M, Tinazzi M, Fiaschi A, Goldoni M, Smania N (2004) A randomized controlled study on the effect of two different treatments (FREMS and TENS) in myofascial pain syndrome. Eur Med Phys 40(4):293–301

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Feedar J, Kloth L, Gentzkow G (1991) Chronic dermal ulcer healing enhanced with monophasic pulsed electrical stimulation. Phys Ther 71(9):639–649

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Goldman R, Brewley B, Cohen R et al (2003) Use of electrotherapy to reverse expanding cutaneous gangrene in end-stage renal disease. Adv Skin Wound Care 16(7):363–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Goldman R, Brewley B, Golden M (2002) Electrotherapy reoxygenates inframalleolar ischemic wounds on diabetic patients. Adv Skin Wound Care 15(3):112–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goldman R, Rosen M, Brewley B, Golden M (2004) Electrotherapy promotes healing and microcirculation of infrapopliteal ischemic wounds: a prospective pilot study. Adv Skin Wound Care 17:284–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Grey J, Harding K, Enoch S (2006) Venous and arterial leg ulcers. BMJ 332:347–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hampton S (2006) An introduction to various types of leg ulcers and their management. Br J Nurs 15(11):S9–S13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hang J, Kong L, Gu JW, Adair TH (1995) VEGF gene expression is upregulated in electrically stimulated rat skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol 269:H1827–H1831

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Houghton P, Kincaid C, Lovell M, Campbell K, Keast D et al (2003) Effect of electrical stimulation on chronic leg ulcer size and appearance. Phys Ther 83(1):17–28

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hoyle-Vaughan G (2006) Treating leg ulcers. Emerg Nurse 14(5):24–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jacques P, Brogan M, Kalinowski D (1997) High-voltage electrical treatment of refractory dermal ulcers. Physician Assist 3:84–97

    Google Scholar 

  26. Janković A, Stanojević M, Binić I (2005) Physical therapy of venous ulcers: effects of electroionotherapy and polarized light. Acta Fac Med Naiss 22(1):29–35

    Google Scholar 

  27. Junger M, Zuder D, Steins A et al (1997) Treatment of venous ulcers with low frequency pulsed current (Dermapulse):effects on cutaneous microcirculation. Hautartz 18:879–903

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kanno S, Oda N, Abe M et al (1999) Establishment of a simple and practical procedure applicable to therapeutic angiogenesis. Circulation 99:2682–2687

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kantor J, Margolis D (2003) Management of leg ulcers. Semin Cutan Med Surg 22(3):212–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Khan MN, Davies CG (2006) Advances in the management of leg ulcers-the potential role of growth factors. Int Wound J 3(2):113–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kloth L, Mc Culloch J (2002) Wound healing: alternatives in management, 3rd edn. F.A. Davis Company, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kloth LC (2005) Electrical stimulation for wound healing: a review of evidence from in vitro studies, animal experiments, and clinical trials. Low Extrem Wounds 4(1):23–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kloth LC et al (1988) Acceleration of wound healing with high voltage, monophasic, pulsed current. Phys Ther 68(4):503–508

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lundeberg T, Eriksson S, Malm M (1992) Electrical nerve stimulation improves healing of diabetic ulcers. Ann Plast Surg 29(4):328–331

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Markov MS (1995) Electric-current and electromagnetic-field effects on soft-tissue-implications fo wound-healing. Wounds Compend Clin Res Pract 7(3):94–110

    Google Scholar 

  36. Markov MS, Pilla AA (1995) Electromagnetic-field stimulation of soft-tissues-pulsed radio-frequency treatment of postoperative pain and edema. Wounds Compend Clin Res Pract 7(4):143–151

    Google Scholar 

  37. Masini A (2004) Nuovi orizzonti nel trattamento conservativo della spalla dolorosa: studio multicentrico sull’utilizzo della FREMS (Frequency Modulated Neural Stimulation) Lorenz Therapy™. Eur Med Phys 40(1):433–435

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mustoe TA, O’Shaughnessy K, Kloeters O (2006) Chronic wound pathogenesis and current treatment strategies: a unifying hypothesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 117(7):35S–41S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Nadler SF (2004) Non pharmacologic management of pain. J Am Osteopath Assoc 104(11):S6–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Peters E, Lavery L, Armstrong D et al (2001) Electric stimulation as an adjunct to heal diabetic foot ulcers: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82:721–724

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Peters E, Armstrong D, Wunderlich R et al (1998) The benefit of electrical stimulation to enhance perfusion in persons with diabetes mellitus. J Foot Ankle Surg 37(5):396–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Sarkar P, Ballantyne S (2000) Management of leg ulcers. Postgrad Med J 76:674–682

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Sheffet A, Cytryn AS, Louria DB (2000) Applying electric and electromagnetic energy as adjuvant treatment for pressure ulcers: a critical review. Ostmy Wound Manage 46(2):28–33, 36–40, 42–44

    Google Scholar 

  44. Slezak A, Kucharzewski M, Franek A, Twardoke W (2004) Evaluation of the efficiency of venous leg ulcer treatment with a membrane dressing. Med Eng Phys 26:53–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Tepper OM, Callaghan MJ, Chang EI et al (2004) Electromagnetic fields increase in vitro and in vivo angiogenesis through endothelial release of FGF-2. FASEB J 18:1231–1233

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Vodovnik L, Karba R (1992) Treatment of chronic wounds by means of electric and electromagnetic fields, Part 1 literature review. Med Biol Eng Comput 30:257–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Williams C (2000) The Verge Videometer wound measurements package. Br J Nursing 9(4):237–239

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Wolcott L, Wheeler P, Hardwicke H et al (1969) Accelerated healing of skin ulcers by electrotherapy: preliminary clinical results. South Med J 62:795–801

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Young MJ, Veves A, Smith JV, Walker MG, Boulton AJM (1995) Restoring lower limb blood flow improves conduction velocity in diabetic patients. Diabetologia 38:1051–1054

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhao M, Bai H, Wang E, Forrester JV, McCaig CD (2004) Electrical stimulation directly induces pre-angiogenic responsesin vascular endothelial cells by signaling through VEGF receptors. J Cell Sci 117:397–405

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was technologically supported by Lorenz Biotech (Medolla, Italy). The company had no role in the design and conduct of the study, the analysis and interpretation of the data, or in the preparation and review of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clinic of Dermatology and Venerology, Clinical Center Niš, Bld. Zorana Djindjića 48, 18000, Niš, Serbia

    Aleksandar Janković & Ivana Binić

Authors
  1. Aleksandar Janković
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ivana Binić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aleksandar Janković.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Janković, A., Binić, I. Frequency rhythmic electrical modulation system in the treatment of chronic painful leg ulcers. Arch Dermatol Res 300, 377–383 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-008-0875-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-008-0875-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation